Salva Phaenomenis. Phenomenological Dimension of Subjectivity in the Frame of the Reductionist Paradigm of the Cognitive Sciences

1. Arendt, H. The Conquest of Space and the Stature of Man. The New Atlantis. Number 18, Fall 2007, 43-55.Search in Google Scholar

2. Auyang, S.Y. Mind in Everyday Life and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.10.7551/mitpress/4628.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

3. Bogen, J. 'Saving the phenomena' and saving the phenomena. Synthese 182 (1), 2011, 7-22.10.1007/s11229-009-9619-4Search in Google Scholar

4. Dennett, D. Consciousness explained. Penguin, London, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

5. Drummond, J.J. Phenomenology: Neither auto- nor hetero- be, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 57-74.10.1007/s11097-006-9037-8Search in Google Scholar

6. Duhem, P. To save the phenomena. Dolan, E. and Maschler C. (transl.), Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1969.10.7208/chicago/9780226381657.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

7. Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. The Phenomenological Mind. London, Routledge, 2012.10.4324/9780203126752Search in Google Scholar

8. Husserl, E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Research: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Kersten, F. (tranls.), Dordrecht, Springer, 1982.10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6Search in Google Scholar

9. Husserl, E. Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man. [in:] Husserl E., Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Laurer, Q. (transl.), Harper & Row/Torchbook, New York 1965, 49-192.Search in Google Scholar

10. Klawiter, A. Thinking like a philosopher, arguing like a cognitive scientist. Diametros 3, 2005, 176-181. (in polish)Search in Google Scholar

11. Klawiter, A. Why did Husserl not become the Galileo of the science of consciousness?, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82, 2004, 253-271.10.1163/9789004333215_013Search in Google Scholar

12. Kosman, A. Saving the Phenomena. Realism and Instrumentalism in Aristotle's Theory of Science. [in:] Kosman, A. Virtues of Thought. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Harvard University Press, 2014, 138-156.10.4159/harvard.9780674416437.c8Search in Google Scholar

13. Liu, C. A Study of Model and Representation Based on Duhemian Thesis. [in:] Magnani, L. and Li, P. (eds.) Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Western & Eastern Studies. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2012, 115-142.Search in Google Scholar

14. Marbach, E. No heterophenomenology without autophenomenology: Variations on a theme of mine. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 6, 2007, 75-87.10.1007/s11097-006-9027-xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Meixner, U. Materialism Does not Save the Phenomena – and the Alternative Which Does. [in:] Koons, R.C. and Bealer, G. (eds.), The Waning of Materialism. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2010, 417-437.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556182.003.0021Search in Google Scholar

16. McGinn, C. Can we Solve the Mind Body Problem? Mind 98 (1989), nr 891, 349-366.10.1093/mind/XCVIII.391.349Search in Google Scholar

17. Miah, A. The Deep Blue Grasshopper: Playing Games with Artificial Intelligence. [in:] Hale, B. (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Chicago, Open Court, 2008, 13-23.Search in Google Scholar

18. Merleau-Ponty, M. The Structure of Experience. Fischer, A.L. (transl.), Beacon Press, Boston, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

19. Owen, G.E.L. Tithenai ta Phenomena. [in:] Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problemes de la methode. Publications Universitaries, Lovain, 1961, 113-126.Search in Google Scholar

20. Rinofner-Kriedl, S. What is Wrong with Naturalizing Epistemology? A Phenomenologist's Reply. [in:] Feist, R. (ed.) Husserl and the Sciences. Selected Perspectives. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2010, 41-68.Search in Google Scholar

21. Roy, J.M. Saving the intentional phenomena: Intentionality, Representation, and Symbol, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. and Roy, J.M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 111-147.10.1515/9781503617421-006Search in Google Scholar

22. Roy, J.M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B. and Varela, F.J. Beyond the Gap: An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. J. and Roy, M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 1-83.10.1515/9781503617421-004Search in Google Scholar

23. Searle, J. The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.10.7551/mitpress/5834.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

24. Spiegelberg, H. The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. The Hague, 1965, vol. II.10.1007/978-94-015-7394-8Search in Google Scholar

25. Stalnaker, R. Varieties of Supervenience. [in:] Stalnaker, R. Ways a World Might Be, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, 86-108.10.1093/0199251487.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

26. Weizsäcker, C.F.v. Deutlichkeit. Hanser, München, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

27. Wilson, R.A. and Keil, F.C. (ed.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1999.10.7551/mitpress/4660.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

28. van Fraassen, B. The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1980.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

29. van Fraassen, B. To save the Phenomena. Journal of Philosophy, 73 (18), 1976, 623-632.10.2307/2025818Search in Google Scholar

30. Varela, F. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3/4, 1996, 330-49.Search in Google Scholar

31. Zahavi, D. Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 3/4, 2004, 331-347.10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4eSearch in Google Scholar

32. Zahavi, D. Husserl's Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford 2003.Search in Google Scholar

33. Zahavi, D. Killing the straw man: Dennett and Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 21-43.10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7Search in Google Scholar