[1. Arendt, H. The Conquest of Space and the Stature of Man. The New Atlantis. Number 18, Fall 2007, 43-55.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Auyang, S.Y. Mind in Everyday Life and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.10.7551/mitpress/4628.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bogen, J. 'Saving the phenomena' and saving the phenomena. Synthese 182 (1), 2011, 7-22.10.1007/s11229-009-9619-4]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Dennett, D. Consciousness explained. Penguin, London, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Drummond, J.J. Phenomenology: Neither auto- nor hetero- be, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 57-74.10.1007/s11097-006-9037-8]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Duhem, P. To save the phenomena. Dolan, E. and Maschler C. (transl.), Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1969.10.7208/chicago/9780226381657.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. The Phenomenological Mind. London, Routledge, 2012.10.4324/9780203126752]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Husserl, E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Research: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Kersten, F. (tranls.), Dordrecht, Springer, 1982.10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Husserl, E. Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man. [in:] Husserl E., Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Laurer, Q. (transl.), Harper & Row/Torchbook, New York 1965, 49-192.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Klawiter, A. Thinking like a philosopher, arguing like a cognitive scientist. Diametros 3, 2005, 176-181. (in polish)]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Klawiter, A. Why did Husserl not become the Galileo of the science of consciousness?, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82, 2004, 253-271.10.1163/9789004333215_013]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kosman, A. Saving the Phenomena. Realism and Instrumentalism in Aristotle's Theory of Science. [in:] Kosman, A. Virtues of Thought. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Harvard University Press, 2014, 138-156.10.4159/harvard.9780674416437.c8]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Liu, C. A Study of Model and Representation Based on Duhemian Thesis. [in:] Magnani, L. and Li, P. (eds.) Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Western & Eastern Studies. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2012, 115-142.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Marbach, E. No heterophenomenology without autophenomenology: Variations on a theme of mine. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 6, 2007, 75-87.10.1007/s11097-006-9027-x]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Meixner, U. Materialism Does not Save the Phenomena – and the Alternative Which Does. [in:] Koons, R.C. and Bealer, G. (eds.), The Waning of Materialism. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2010, 417-437.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556182.003.0021]Search in Google Scholar
[16. McGinn, C. Can we Solve the Mind Body Problem? Mind 98 (1989), nr 891, 349-366.10.1093/mind/XCVIII.391.349]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Miah, A. The Deep Blue Grasshopper: Playing Games with Artificial Intelligence. [in:] Hale, B. (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Chicago, Open Court, 2008, 13-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Merleau-Ponty, M. The Structure of Experience. Fischer, A.L. (transl.), Beacon Press, Boston, 1963.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Owen, G.E.L. Tithenai ta Phenomena. [in:] Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problemes de la methode. Publications Universitaries, Lovain, 1961, 113-126.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Rinofner-Kriedl, S. What is Wrong with Naturalizing Epistemology? A Phenomenologist's Reply. [in:] Feist, R. (ed.) Husserl and the Sciences. Selected Perspectives. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2010, 41-68.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Roy, J.M. Saving the intentional phenomena: Intentionality, Representation, and Symbol, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. and Roy, J.M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 111-147.10.1515/9781503617421-006]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Roy, J.M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B. and Varela, F.J. Beyond the Gap: An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology, [in:] Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. J. and Roy, M. (eds.) Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, 1999, 1-83.10.1515/9781503617421-004]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Searle, J. The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.10.7551/mitpress/5834.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Spiegelberg, H. The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. The Hague, 1965, vol. II.10.1007/978-94-015-7394-8]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Stalnaker, R. Varieties of Supervenience. [in:] Stalnaker, R. Ways a World Might Be, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, 86-108.10.1093/0199251487.003.0006]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Weizsäcker, C.F.v. Deutlichkeit. Hanser, München, 1978.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Wilson, R.A. and Keil, F.C. (ed.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1999.10.7551/mitpress/4660.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[28. van Fraassen, B. The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1980.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[29. van Fraassen, B. To save the Phenomena. Journal of Philosophy, 73 (18), 1976, 623-632.10.2307/2025818]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Varela, F. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3/4, 1996, 330-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Zahavi, D. Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 3/4, 2004, 331-347.10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4e]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Zahavi, D. Husserl's Phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Zahavi, D. Killing the straw man: Dennett and Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6 (1-2), 2007, 21-43.10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7]Search in Google Scholar