[AKCURA, M. and Y. KAYA (2008): Nonparameter stability methods for interpreting genotype by environment interaction for breed wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetica and Molecular Biology 131: 906-913.10.1590/S1415-47572008005000004]Search in Google Scholar
[BARKLEY, A., H. H. PETERSON and J. SHROYER (2010): Wheat variety selection to maximize returns and minimize risk: an application of portfolio theory. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42: 39-55.10.1017/S107407080000328X]Search in Google Scholar
[BECKER, H. C. and J. LÉON (1988): Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101: 1-23. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x]Search in Google Scholar
[CROWE, K. A. and W. H. PARKER (2008): Using portfolio theory to guide reforestation and restoration under climate change scenarios. Climate Change 89: 355-370.10.1007/s10584-007-9373-x]Search in Google Scholar
[EULER, F. VON, P. BARADAT and B. LEMOINE (1992): Effects of plantation density and spacing on competitive interactions among half-sib families of maritime pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 482-489.10.1139/x92-063]Search in Google Scholar
[FOSTERA, G. S., R. J. ROUSSEAUB and W. L. NANCEC (1998): Eastern cottonwood clonal mixing study: intergenotypic competition effects. Forest Ecology and Management 112: 9-22.10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00302-8]Search in Google Scholar
[FOWLER, D. P. (1986): Strategies for the genetic improvement of important tree species in the Maritimes. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, Information Report M-X-156.]Search in Google Scholar
[FRANCIS, T. R. and L.W. KANNENBERG (1978): Yield stability studies in short season maize: I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58: 1029-1034.10.4141/cjps78-157]Search in Google Scholar
[HONER, T. G., M. F. KER and I. S. ALEMDAG (1983): Metric timber tables for the commercial tree species of central and eastern Canada. NRCan., CFS - AFC. Inf. Rep. MX-140. Fredericton, NB.]Search in Google Scholar
[LI, B. and S. E. MCKEAND (1989): Stability of loblolly pine families in the southeastern U.S. Silvae Genetica 38: 96-101.]Search in Google Scholar
[LINDGREN, D. (1993): The population biology of clonal deployment, pp 34-49. In: Clonal forestry I: genetics and biotechnology. Edited by AHUJA, M. R. and W. J. LIBBY, Spring-Verlag, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-84175-0_4]Search in Google Scholar
[LINDGREN, D. and A. C. MATHESON (1986): An algorithm for increasing the genetic quality of seed from seed orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae Genetica 35: 173-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[LINDGREN, D. and T. J. MULLIN (1997): Selection for coancestry- adjusted performance to combine genetic gain and effective population size. Silvae Genetica 46: 124-129.]Search in Google Scholar
[MARKOWITZ, H. M. (1952): Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance. 7: 77-91.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCKEAND, S. E., E. J. JOKELA, D. A. HUBER, T. D. BYRAM, H. L. ALLEN, B. LI and T. J. MULLIN (2006): Performance of improved genotypes of loblolly pine across different soils, climates, and silvicultural inputs. Forest Ecology and. Management 277: 178-184.]Search in Google Scholar
[MURPHY, S. E., R. J. LEE, L. WOODROW, P. SEGUIN, J. KUMAR, I. RAJCAN and G. R. ALBETT (2009): Genotype x environment interaction and stability for isoflavone content in soybean. Crop Science 49: 1313-1321.10.2135/cropsci2008.09.0533]Search in Google Scholar
[NALLEY, L., A. BARKLEY, B. WATKINS and J. HIGNIGHT (2009): Enhancing farm profitability through portfolio analysis: the case of spatial rice variety selection. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41: 641-652.10.1017/S1074070800003126]Search in Google Scholar
[[NBTIC] NEW BRUNSWICK TREE IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL (1991): 1991 black spruce progeny test. Establishment Report No.33. Fredericton, New Brunswick.]Search in Google Scholar
[NBTIC (2000): 2000 black spruce full-sib progeny test. Establishment Report No.59. Fredericton, New Brunswick.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS INSTITUTE (1990): SAS procedure guide. 3rd ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. 750pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHNEEBERGER, M., A. E. FREEMAN and M. D. BOEHIJE (1982): Application of portfolio theory to dairy sire selection. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 404-409.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82205-4]Search in Google Scholar
[SHUKLA, G. K. (1972): Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.10.1038/hdy.1972.874507945]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH, S. P. and K. HAMMOND (1987): Portfolio theory, utility theory and mate selection. Genetics Selection Evolution 19: 321-336.10.1186/1297-9686-19-3-321271328822879289]Search in Google Scholar
[STAUDHAMMER, C. L., E. J. JOKELA and T. A. MARTIN (2009): Competition dynamics in pure-versus mixedfamily stands of loblolly and slash pine in the southeastern United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39: 396-409.10.1139/X08-184]Search in Google Scholar
[ST. CLAIR, J. B., N. L. MANDEL and K. J. S. JAYAWICKRAMA (2004): Early realized genetic gains for coastal Douglasfir in the Norhtern Oregon cascades. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 19: 195-201.10.1093/wjaf/19.3.195]Search in Google Scholar
[WENG, Y. H. (2011): Early realized gains for two-cycle selection for black spruce and their implications for testing effect allocation. Silvae Genetica 60: 178-186.10.1515/sg-2011-0024]Search in Google Scholar
[WENG, Y. H., Y. S. PARK and D. LINDGREN (2012): Unequal clonal deployment improves genetic gains at constant diversity levels for clonal forestry. Tree Genetics and Genome 8: 1-9. 10.1007/s11295-011-0422-2]Search in Google Scholar
[WENG, Y. H., K. J. TOSH and M. S. FULLARTON (2010): Determining and projecting realized genetic gains: Results from early-stage spruce improvement programmes in New Brunswick, Canada. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science 40: 5-17.]Search in Google Scholar