[1. CHENG, C., et al. 2005. Treatment of spent metalworking fluids. Water Res., Vol. 39, pp. 4051–4063.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. KEMP, C., P., HILL, I. 2004. Health and safety aspects in the live music industry, p. 298.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. PARK, D. 2012. The Occupational Exposure Limit for Fluid Aerosol Generated in Metalworking Operations: Limitations and Recommendations. Saf. Health Work, 3(1), p. 10.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. SCHWARZ, M. et al. 2015. Environmental and health aspects of metalworking fluid use. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 24(1), pp. 37–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. De GROOTE, M., A., HUITT, G. 2012. Infections due to rapidly growing mycobacteria. Clin. Infect. Dis., No. 42, pp. 1756–1763.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. FRIESEN, M., C., et al. 2012. Metalworking fluid exposure and cancer risk in a retrospective cohort of female autoworkers. Cancer Causes Control, 23(7), pp. 1075–82.10.1007/s10552-012-9976-z337011122562220]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. van WENDEL, B., et al., 2005. An assessment of dermal exposure to semi-synthetic metal working fluids by different methods to group workers for an epidemiological study on dermatitis. Occup. Environ. Med., 62(9), pp. 633–41.10.1136/oem.2004.015396174108116109820]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. LILLIENBERG, L., et al. 2010. Respiratory symptoms and exposure-response relations in workers exposed to metalworking fluid aerosols. Ann. Occup. Hyg., 54(4), pp. 403–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. SAHA, R., DONOFRIO, R., S. 2012. The microbiology of metalworking fluids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 94(5), pp. 1119–1130.10.1007/s00253-012-4055-722543351]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. TRAFNY, E. 2013. Microorganisms in metalworking fluids: current issues in research and management. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health, 26(1), pp. 4–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. DILGER, S., et al. 2005. Bacterial contamination of preserved and non-preserved metal working fluids. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 208(6), pp. 467–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. LODDERS, N., KÄMPFER, P. 2012. A combined cultivation and cultivation-independent approach shows high bacterial diversity in water-miscible metalworking fluids. Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 35(4), pp. 246–252.10.1016/j.syapm.2012.03.00622609341]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. RUDNICK, L., R. 2009. Lubricant Additives Chemistry and Applications. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group LCC, 209 p.10.1201/9781420059656]Search in Google Scholar
[14. TRAFNY, E. A. et al. 2015. Microbial contamination and biofilms on machines of metal industry using metalworking fluids with or without biocides. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation, vol. 99, pp. 31–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. HUIZING, I., T., et al. 2011. Evaluation Manual for the Authorisation of plant protection products and biocides EU part Biocides Chapter 2 Physical and chemical properties Authors.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. BAKALOVA, S. 2008. Microbial toxicity of ethanolamines. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 22(2), pp. 716–720.10.1080/13102818.2008.10817540]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. LOTIERZO, A. et al. 2016. Insight into the role of amines in Metal Working Fluids. Corros. Sci..10.1016/j.corsci.2016.04.028]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Metal Working Fluids Recommendation for Chronic Inhalation Studies National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2001. p. 90.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. MADAN, V., BECK, M., H. 2006. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from N,N-methylene-bis-5-methyl-oxazolidine in coolant oils. Contact Dermatitis, 55(1), pp. 39–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. “ECHA - European chemicals agency.” [Online]. Available: https://echa.europa.eu/home.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. GRAINGE, C., et al. 2013. Case series reporting the effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil in treatmentresistant asthma. Eur. Respir. J., 42(4), pp. 1134–1137.10.1183/09031936.0002641324081762]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Harmonised classification and labeling proposal for N,N’-methylene bismorpholine (MBM) - Lubrizol comments for the public consultation. 2016, pp. 1–26.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. OI, M. 2011. Emission scenario document on the use of metalworking fluids OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications Series on Emission Scenario Documents Number 28, ENV/JM/MONO(2011)18, 33(28), pp. 1–127.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. BRUTTO, P., E. 2013. Amines 101 for Metalworking Fluids. Tribol. Lubr. Technol., pp. 2–3.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. JAGADEVAN, S., et al. 2013. Treatment of waste metalworking fluid by a hybrid ozone-biological process. J. Hazard. Mater., Vol. 244–245, pp. 394–402.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. FROSCH, P., J., et al. 2006. Contact Dermatitis. Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/3-540-31301-X]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Boric Acid and Metalworking Fluids. 2007. pp. 1–2.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency), “Member state committee draft support document for identification of boric acid as a substance of very high concern because of its CMR properties,” SVHC Support Doc., 2010. Vol. 2, pp. 1–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. PATNAIK, P. 2007. A Comprehensive Guide to the Hazardous Properties of Chemical Substances, 3rd ed.10.1002/9780470134955]Search in Google Scholar
[30. AMRITA, M., et al. 2014. Evaluation of Cutting Fluid With Nanoinclusions. J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med., 4(3), pp. 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. 2-aminoethanol. [on-line]. Available: https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.004.986]Search in Google Scholar