[Anselin L., Bera A.K., Florax R.J., Yoon M.J., 1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26(1): 77–104.10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Artelaris P., Kallioras D., Petrakos G., 2010. Regional inequalities and convergence clubs in the European Union new member-states. Eastern Journal of European Studies 1(1): 113–133.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baláž V., 2007. Regional polarization under transition: The case of Slovakia. European Planning Studies 15(5): 587–602.10.1080/09654310600852639]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barro R.J., Sala-I-Martin X., 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100(2): 223–251.10.1086/261816]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Becattini G., 1978. The development of light industry in Tuscany. Economic Notes 3(2): 107–122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blažek J., Macešková M., 2010. Regional analysis of public capital expenditure: To which regions are public capital expenditure channelled – to “rich” or to “poor” ones? Regional Studies 44(6): 679–696.10.1080/00343400903002713]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blažek J., Netrdová P., 2012. Aktuální tendence lokální diferenciace vybraných socioekonomických jevů v Česku: směřuje vývoj k větší mozaikovosti prostorového uspořádání? (Contemporary tendencies of the development of spatial pattern on the local level in Czechia: Towards higher fragmentation of the spatial pattern?). Geografie 117(3): 266–288.10.37040/geografie2012117030266]Search in Google Scholar
[Boldrin M., Canova F., 2001. Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: Reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy 16(32): 207–253.10.1111/1468-0327.00074]Search in Google Scholar
[Cace C., Cace S., Iova C., Nicolaescu V., 2009. Absorption capacity of the structural funds. Integrating perspectives. Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială 27: 7–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Camaioni B., Esposti R., Lobianco A., Pagliacci F., Sotte F., 2013. How rural is the EU RDP? An analysis through spatial fund allocation. Bio-based and Applied Economics 2(3): 277–300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Churski P., 2005. Problem areas in Poland in terms of the objectives of the European Union’s regional policy. European Planning Studies 13(1): 45–72.10.1080/0965431042000312406]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crescenzi R., 2009. Undermining the principle of concentration? European Union regional policy and the socio-economic disadvantage of European regions. Regional Studies 43(1): 111–133.10.1080/00343400801932276]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crescenzi R., De Fillipis F., Pierangeli F., 2015. In tandem for cohesion? Synergies and conflicts between regional and agricultural policies of the European Union. Regional Studies 49(4): 681–704.10.1080/00343404.2014.946401]Search in Google Scholar
[Czyż T., Hauke J., 2011. Evolution of regional disparities in Poland. Quaestiones Geographicae 30(2): 35–48.10.2478/v10117-011-0016-y]Search in Google Scholar
[De Propris L., 2007. Reconciling cohesion and competitiveness through EU cluster policies? Policy Studies 28(4): 327–345.10.1080/01442870701640690]Search in Google Scholar
[Dellmuth L.M., Stoffel M.F., 2012. Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: The local allocation of European Union structural funds. European Union Politics 13(3): 413–433.10.1177/1465116512440511]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Duran M., 2014. The absorption capacity of Turkey for its use of the European Union pre-accession assistance. Bogazici Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 28(1): 69–93.10.21773/boun.28.1.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Enflo K., Hjertstrand P., 2009. Relative sources of European regional productivity convergence: A bootstrap frontier approach. Regional Studies 43(4): 643–659.10.1080/00343400701874198]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Esposti R., Bussoletti S., 2008. Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: A panel-data approach. Regional Studies 42(2): 159–173.10.1080/00343400601142753]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ezcurra R., 2009. Does income polarization affect economic growth? The case of the European regions. Regional Studies 43(2): 267–285.10.1080/00343400701808899]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fischer M.M., Stirböck C., 2006. Pan-European regional income growth and club-convergence. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(4): 693–721.10.1007/s00168-005-0042-6]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fratesi U., 2008. Regional policy from a supra-regional perspective. The Annals of Regional Science 42(3): 681–703.10.1007/s00168-007-0167-x]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fujita M., Krugman P., 2004. The new economic geography: Past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science 83(1): 139–164.10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Geppert K., Stephan A., 2008. Regional disparities in the European Union: Convergence and agglomeration. Papers in Regional Science 87(2): 193–217.10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00161.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson R., 2007. Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice. Regional Studies 41(9): 1149–1160.10.1080/00343400701291617]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Iatu C., Alupului C., 2011. Structural funds’ absorption in Romania: Factor analysis of NUTS 3 level. Transformations in Business & Economics 10(2b): 612–630.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaliu D., Radulescu C., 2013. Six years in managing structural funds in Romania. Lessons learned. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science 9(38): 79–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jurevičienė D., Pileckaitė J., 2013. The impact of EU structural fund support and problems of its absorption. Business, Management and Education 11(1): 1–18.10.3846/bme.2013.01]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaufmann A., Wagner P., 2005. EU regional policy and the stimulation of innovation: The role of the European Regional Development Fund in the Objective 1 Region Burgenland. European Planning Studies 13(4): 581–599.10.1080/09654310500107274]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Klímová V., Žítek V., 2015. Inovační paradox v Česku: Ekonomická teorie a politická realita. Politická ekonomie 63(2): 147–166.10.18267/j.polek.994]Search in Google Scholar
[Krugman P., 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99(3): 483–499.10.1086/261763]Search in Google Scholar
[Lambrinidis M., Psycharis Y., Rovolis A., 2005. Regional allocation of public infrastructure investment: The case of Greece. Regional Studies 39(9): 1231–1244.10.1080/00343400500390057]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lolos S.E.G., 2009. The effect of EU structural funds on regional growth, assessing the evidence from Greece, 1990–2005. Economic Change Restructuring 42(3): 211–228.10.1007/s10644-009-9070-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Lošťák M., Hudečková H., 2010. Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics 56(6): 249–265.10.17221/27/2010-AGRICECON]Search in Google Scholar
[Maillat D., 1998. Innovative milieu and new generations of regional policies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 10(1): 1–16.10.1080/08985629800000001]Search in Google Scholar
[Martín C., Sanz I., 2003. Real convergence and European integration: The experience of the less developed EU members. Empirica 30(3): 205–236.10.1023/A:1026014600454]Search in Google Scholar
[Milio S., 2007. Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(4): 429–442.10.1080/00343400601120213]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Modranka E., 2015. Spatial dependencies in the absorption of funds from Regional Operational Programmes on NUTS 3 regional level in Poland. Journal of Economics & Management 19(1): 108–122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moulaert F., Mehmood A., 2010. Analysing regional development and policy: A structural-realist approach. Regional Studies 44(1): 103–118.10.1080/00343400802251478]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Novák J., Netrdová P., 2011. Prostorové vzorce sociálně-ekonomické diferenciace obcí v České republice (Spatial patterns of socioeconomic differentiation in the Czech Republic at the level of municipalities). Czech Sociological Review 47(4): 717–744.10.13060/00380288.2011.47.4.05]Search in Google Scholar
[Novosák J., Hájek O., Smékalová L., Nekolová J., Škarka M., 2015. Territorial cohesion and the geography of EU Cohesion Policy funding in the Czech Republic. Transformations in Business & Economics 14(3C): 42–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Novosák J., Hájek O., Horváth P., Nekolová J., 2017. Structural Funding and intrastate regional disparities in post-communist countries. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 13(51): 53–69.10.24193/tras.51E.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Parr J.B., 1999. Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: A retrospective view. Part 1. Origins and advocacy. Urban Studies 36(7): 1195–1215.10.1080/004209899318722550672]Search in Google Scholar
[Pawlicz A., 2014. Selected determinants of absorption of EU – tourism-related projects. The case of counties in West Pomerania and Lubuskie, Poland. Service Management 12: 61–69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popescu A.S., 2015. The absorption capacity of European funds – concepts. Annals-Economy Series 18(3): 119–125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter M.E., 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review 68(2): 73–93.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Puga D., 2002. European regional policies in light of recent location theories. Journal of Economic Geography 2(4): 373–406.10.1093/jeg/2.4.373]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pugicerver-Peňalver M.C., 2007. The impact of structural funds policy on European regions’ growth. A theoretical and empirical approach. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 4(2): 179–208.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schraff D., 2014. Buying turnout or rewarding loyalists? Electoral mobilization and EU structural funding in the German Länder. European Union Politics 15(2): 277–288.10.1177/1465116513509308]Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Simmie J., Carpenter J., 2008. Towards an evolutionary and endogenous growth theory explanation of why regional and urban economies in England are diverging. Planning, Practice & Research 23(1): 101–124.10.1080/02697450802076613]Search in Google Scholar
[Smetkowski M., 2013. Regional disparities in Central and Eastern European countries: Trends, drivers and prospects. Europe-Asia Studies 65(8): 1529–1554.10.1080/09668136.2013.833038]Search in Google Scholar
[Tatar M., 2010. Estonian local government absorption capacity of European Union structural funds. Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture 11(2): 202–226.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tödling F., Trippl M., 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34(8): 1203–1219.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Tosun J., 2014. Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(2): 371–387.10.1111/jcms.12088]Search in Google Scholar
[Václavík J., 2015. Indirect support of research and development in the Czech Republic. Scientia et Societas 11(2): 110–125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaman G., Georgescu G., 2009. Structural fund absorption: A new challenge for Romania? Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 10(1): 136–154.]Search in Google Scholar