1. bookVolume 36 (2017): Edition 4 (December 2017)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2081-6383
Première parution
01 Jun 1974
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

Regional disparities, absorption capacity and Structural Fund payments: A case study of the Czech Republic

Publié en ligne: 21 Dec 2017
Volume & Edition: Volume 36 (2017) - Edition 4 (December 2017)
Pages: 81 - 92
Reçu: 08 Dec 2016
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2081-6383
Première parution
01 Jun 1974
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais

Anselin L., Bera A.K., Florax R.J., Yoon M.J., 1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26(1): 77–104.10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Artelaris P., Kallioras D., Petrakos G., 2010. Regional inequalities and convergence clubs in the European Union new member-states. Eastern Journal of European Studies 1(1): 113–133.Search in Google Scholar

Baláž V., 2007. Regional polarization under transition: The case of Slovakia. European Planning Studies 15(5): 587–602.10.1080/09654310600852639Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Barro R.J., Sala-I-Martin X., 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100(2): 223–251.10.1086/261816Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Becattini G., 1978. The development of light industry in Tuscany. Economic Notes 3(2): 107–122.Search in Google Scholar

Blažek J., Macešková M., 2010. Regional analysis of public capital expenditure: To which regions are public capital expenditure channelled – to “rich” or to “poor” ones? Regional Studies 44(6): 679–696.10.1080/00343400903002713Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Blažek J., Netrdová P., 2012. Aktuální tendence lokální diferenciace vybraných socioekonomických jevů v Česku: směřuje vývoj k větší mozaikovosti prostorového uspořádání? (Contemporary tendencies of the development of spatial pattern on the local level in Czechia: Towards higher fragmentation of the spatial pattern?). Geografie 117(3): 266–288.10.37040/geografie2012117030266Search in Google Scholar

Boldrin M., Canova F., 2001. Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: Reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy 16(32): 207–253.10.1111/1468-0327.00074Search in Google Scholar

Cace C., Cace S., Iova C., Nicolaescu V., 2009. Absorption capacity of the structural funds. Integrating perspectives. Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială 27: 7–28.Search in Google Scholar

Camaioni B., Esposti R., Lobianco A., Pagliacci F., Sotte F., 2013. How rural is the EU RDP? An analysis through spatial fund allocation. Bio-based and Applied Economics 2(3): 277–300.Search in Google Scholar

Churski P., 2005. Problem areas in Poland in terms of the objectives of the European Union’s regional policy. European Planning Studies 13(1): 45–72.10.1080/0965431042000312406Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Crescenzi R., 2009. Undermining the principle of concentration? European Union regional policy and the socio-economic disadvantage of European regions. Regional Studies 43(1): 111–133.10.1080/00343400801932276Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Crescenzi R., De Fillipis F., Pierangeli F., 2015. In tandem for cohesion? Synergies and conflicts between regional and agricultural policies of the European Union. Regional Studies 49(4): 681–704.10.1080/00343404.2014.946401Search in Google Scholar

Czyż T., Hauke J., 2011. Evolution of regional disparities in Poland. Quaestiones Geographicae 30(2): 35–48.10.2478/v10117-011-0016-ySearch in Google Scholar

De Propris L., 2007. Reconciling cohesion and competitiveness through EU cluster policies? Policy Studies 28(4): 327–345.10.1080/01442870701640690Search in Google Scholar

Dellmuth L.M., Stoffel M.F., 2012. Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: The local allocation of European Union structural funds. European Union Politics 13(3): 413–433.10.1177/1465116512440511Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Duran M., 2014. The absorption capacity of Turkey for its use of the European Union pre-accession assistance. Bogazici Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 28(1): 69–93.10.21773/boun.28.1.4Search in Google Scholar

Enflo K., Hjertstrand P., 2009. Relative sources of European regional productivity convergence: A bootstrap frontier approach. Regional Studies 43(4): 643–659.10.1080/00343400701874198Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Esposti R., Bussoletti S., 2008. Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: A panel-data approach. Regional Studies 42(2): 159–173.10.1080/00343400601142753Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ezcurra R., 2009. Does income polarization affect economic growth? The case of the European regions. Regional Studies 43(2): 267–285.10.1080/00343400701808899Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fischer M.M., Stirböck C., 2006. Pan-European regional income growth and club-convergence. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(4): 693–721.10.1007/s00168-005-0042-6Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fratesi U., 2008. Regional policy from a supra-regional perspective. The Annals of Regional Science 42(3): 681–703.10.1007/s00168-007-0167-xOuvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fujita M., Krugman P., 2004. The new economic geography: Past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science 83(1): 139–164.10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0Search in Google Scholar

Geppert K., Stephan A., 2008. Regional disparities in the European Union: Convergence and agglomeration. Papers in Regional Science 87(2): 193–217.10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00161.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hudson R., 2007. Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice. Regional Studies 41(9): 1149–1160.10.1080/00343400701291617Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Iatu C., Alupului C., 2011. Structural funds’ absorption in Romania: Factor analysis of NUTS 3 level. Transformations in Business & Economics 10(2b): 612–630.Search in Google Scholar

Jaliu D., Radulescu C., 2013. Six years in managing structural funds in Romania. Lessons learned. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science 9(38): 79–95.Search in Google Scholar

Jurevičienė D., Pileckaitė J., 2013. The impact of EU structural fund support and problems of its absorption. Business, Management and Education 11(1): 1–18.10.3846/bme.2013.01Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kaufmann A., Wagner P., 2005. EU regional policy and the stimulation of innovation: The role of the European Regional Development Fund in the Objective 1 Region Burgenland. European Planning Studies 13(4): 581–599.10.1080/09654310500107274Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Klímová V., Žítek V., 2015. Inovační paradox v Česku: Ekonomická teorie a politická realita. Politická ekonomie 63(2): 147–166.10.18267/j.polek.994Search in Google Scholar

Krugman P., 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99(3): 483–499.10.1086/261763Search in Google Scholar

Lambrinidis M., Psycharis Y., Rovolis A., 2005. Regional allocation of public infrastructure investment: The case of Greece. Regional Studies 39(9): 1231–1244.10.1080/00343400500390057Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lolos S.E.G., 2009. The effect of EU structural funds on regional growth, assessing the evidence from Greece, 1990–2005. Economic Change Restructuring 42(3): 211–228.10.1007/s10644-009-9070-zSearch in Google Scholar

Lošťák M., Hudečková H., 2010. Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics 56(6): 249–265.10.17221/27/2010-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

Maillat D., 1998. Innovative milieu and new generations of regional policies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 10(1): 1–16.10.1080/08985629800000001Search in Google Scholar

Martín C., Sanz I., 2003. Real convergence and European integration: The experience of the less developed EU members. Empirica 30(3): 205–236.10.1023/A:1026014600454Search in Google Scholar

Milio S., 2007. Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(4): 429–442.10.1080/00343400601120213Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Modranka E., 2015. Spatial dependencies in the absorption of funds from Regional Operational Programmes on NUTS 3 regional level in Poland. Journal of Economics & Management 19(1): 108–122.Search in Google Scholar

Moulaert F., Mehmood A., 2010. Analysing regional development and policy: A structural-realist approach. Regional Studies 44(1): 103–118.10.1080/00343400802251478Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Novák J., Netrdová P., 2011. Prostorové vzorce sociálně-ekonomické diferenciace obcí v České republice (Spatial patterns of socioeconomic differentiation in the Czech Republic at the level of municipalities). Czech Sociological Review 47(4): 717–744.10.13060/00380288.2011.47.4.05Search in Google Scholar

Novosák J., Hájek O., Smékalová L., Nekolová J., Škarka M., 2015. Territorial cohesion and the geography of EU Cohesion Policy funding in the Czech Republic. Transformations in Business & Economics 14(3C): 42–59.Search in Google Scholar

Novosák J., Hájek O., Horváth P., Nekolová J., 2017. Structural Funding and intrastate regional disparities in post-communist countries. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 13(51): 53–69.10.24193/tras.51E.4Search in Google Scholar

Parr J.B., 1999. Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: A retrospective view. Part 1. Origins and advocacy. Urban Studies 36(7): 1195–1215.10.1080/004209899318722550672Search in Google Scholar

Pawlicz A., 2014. Selected determinants of absorption of EU – tourism-related projects. The case of counties in West Pomerania and Lubuskie, Poland. Service Management 12: 61–69.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu A.S., 2015. The absorption capacity of European funds – concepts. Annals-Economy Series 18(3): 119–125.Search in Google Scholar

Porter M.E., 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review 68(2): 73–93.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1_2Search in Google Scholar

Puga D., 2002. European regional policies in light of recent location theories. Journal of Economic Geography 2(4): 373–406.10.1093/jeg/2.4.373Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pugicerver-Peňalver M.C., 2007. The impact of structural funds policy on European regions’ growth. A theoretical and empirical approach. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 4(2): 179–208.Search in Google Scholar

Schraff D., 2014. Buying turnout or rewarding loyalists? Electoral mobilization and EU structural funding in the German Länder. European Union Politics 15(2): 277–288.10.1177/1465116513509308Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simmie J., Carpenter J., 2008. Towards an evolutionary and endogenous growth theory explanation of why regional and urban economies in England are diverging. Planning, Practice & Research 23(1): 101–124.10.1080/02697450802076613Search in Google Scholar

Smetkowski M., 2013. Regional disparities in Central and Eastern European countries: Trends, drivers and prospects. Europe-Asia Studies 65(8): 1529–1554.10.1080/09668136.2013.833038Search in Google Scholar

Tatar M., 2010. Estonian local government absorption capacity of European Union structural funds. Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture 11(2): 202–226.Search in Google Scholar

Tödling F., Trippl M., 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34(8): 1203–1219.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018Search in Google Scholar

Tosun J., 2014. Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(2): 371–387.10.1111/jcms.12088Search in Google Scholar

Václavík J., 2015. Indirect support of research and development in the Czech Republic. Scientia et Societas 11(2): 110–125.Search in Google Scholar

Zaman G., Georgescu G., 2009. Structural fund absorption: A new challenge for Romania? Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 10(1): 136–154.Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo