Taxation of Controlled Foreign Companies in Context of the OECD/G20 Project on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting as well as the EU Proposal for the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive – An Interim Nordic Assessment
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Agnarsdóttir, Fjóla and Rakel Jensdóttir. 2014. “Corporate taxation in Iceland and the international challenge.” Nordic Tax Journal (2), 149–72.AgnarsdóttirFjólaRakelJensdóttir2014“Corporate taxation in Iceland and the international challenge.”21497210.1515/ntaxj-2014-0023Search in Google Scholar
Aigner, Hans-Jörgen, Ulrich Scheurle, and Markus Stefaner. 2004. “General Report.” In CFC Legislation, Tax Treaties and EC Law, edited by Michael Lang, Hans-JörgenAigner, Ulrich Scheurle, and Markus Stefaner, 13–52. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.AignerHans-JörgenUlrichScheurleandMarkusStefaner2004“General Report.”MichaelLangHans-JörgenAignerUlrichScheurleMarkusStefaner1352The Hague: Kluwer Law InternationalSearch in Google Scholar
Arnold, Brian. 1986. The Taxation of Controlled Foreign Corporations – An International Comparison. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.ArnoldBrian1986TorontoCanadian Tax FoundationSearch in Google Scholar
Arnold, Brian and Patrick Dibout. 2001. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 86b, edited by International Fiscal Association, 21–89. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.ArnoldBrianPatrickDibout2001“General Report.”86bInternationalFiscal Association2189The Hague: Kluwer Law InternationalSearch in Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, Reuven. 2005. “All of a Piece Throughout – The Four Ages of U.S. International Taxation.“ Virginia Tax Review (2), 313–38.Avi-YonahReuven2005“All of a Piece Throughout – The Four Ages of U.S. International Taxation.“23133810.2139/ssrn.742525Search in Google Scholar
Barenfield, Jesper and Roger Österman. 2008. “De nya CFC-reglerne – en kommentar.” Svensk Skattetidning (2), 105–8.BarenfieldJesperRogerÖsterman2008“De nya CFC-reglerne – en kommentar.”21058Search in Google Scholar
Blanluet, Gauthier and Phillippe J. Durand. 2011. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 96b, edited by International Fiscal Association, 17-58. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.BlanluetGauthierPhillippe JDurand2011“General Report.”96bInternationalFiscal Association1758The HagueSDU UitgiversSearch in Google Scholar
Bogdan, Michael. 2013. Concise Introduction to Comparative Law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.BogdanMichael2013GroningenEuropa Law PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Brauner, Yariv. 2014. “BEPS: An Interim Evaluation.” World Tax Journal 6 (1), 10–39.BraunerYariv2014“BEPS: An Interim Evaluation.”611039Search in Google Scholar
Broe, Luc de. 2008. International Tax Planning and Prevention of Abuse. Amsterdam: IBFD.BroeLuc de2008AmsterdamIBFDSearch in Google Scholar
Bundgaard, Jakob. 2007. “Skattearbitrage & Korrespondensprincip – Omkvalificering af gæld til egenkapital ved udenlandsk skattefrihed af afkast fra hybride finansielle instrumenter.” SkatUdland (207), 556–69.BundgaardJakob2007“Skattearbitrage & Korrespondensprincip – Omkvalificering af gæld til egenkapital ved udenlandsk skattefrihed af afkast fra hybride finansielle instrumenter.”20755669Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Mattias and Bertil Wiman. 2013. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 98a, 17–56. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.DahlbergMattiasBertilWiman2013“General Report.”98a1756The Hague: SDU UitgiversSearch in Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Mattias. 2012. InternationellBeskattning. Lund: Studenterlitteratur.DahlbergMattias2012LundStudenterlitteraturSearch in Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Mattias. 2008. ”Regeringsrättenoch de folkrättsligaskatteavtalan.” Skattenytt (7/8), 482–89.DahlbergMattias2008”Regeringsrättenoch de folkrättsligaskatteavtalan.”7/848289Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Mattias. 2000. Svensk skatteavtalspolitikochutlandskebasbolag. Uppsala: IustusFörlag.DahlbergMattias2000UppsalaIustusFörlagSearch in Google Scholar
Dourado, Ana Paula. 2015. “The Role of CFC Rules in the BEPS Initiative and in the EU.” British Tax Review(3), 340–63.DouradoAna Paula2015“The Role of CFC Rules in the BEPS Initiative and in the EU.”334063Search in Google Scholar
Farstad, Snorre. 2010. “Er tilknytningskravet etter sktl. § 2-38 tredje eller femte led strengere enn tilknytningskravet i EØS-avtalens regler om etbleringsrett? – Forholdet mellem EF-domstolens avgjørelser i Aberdeen og Cadbury Schweppes.” Skatteret (2), 157–77.FarstadSnorre2010“Er tilknytningskravet etter sktl. § 2-38 tredje eller femte led strengere enn tilknytningskravet i EØS-avtalens regler om etbleringsrett? – Forholdet mellem EF-domstolens avgjørelser i Aberdeen og Cadbury Schweppes.”21577710.18261/ISSN1504-310X-2010-02-04Search in Google Scholar
Folkvord, Benn. 2016. “Kommentar til Høyesteretts dom af 15. mars 2016 (enstemmig) – Den Norske Amerikalinje – Lavskatteland: Ingen vektet vurdering ved sammenligning av lands skattenivå.” www.retsdata.no. Accessed 7 June 2016.FolkvordBenn2016“Kommentar til Høyesteretts dom af 15. mars 2016 (enstemmig) – Den Norske Amerikalinje – Lavskatteland: Ingen vektet vurdering ved sammenligning av lands skattenivå.”Search in Google Scholar
Folkvord, Benn and Michael Riis. 2014. “Corporate income tax and the international challenge.” Nordic Tax Journal (2), 55–87.FolkvordBennMichaelRiis2014“Corporate income tax and the international challenge.”2558710.1515/ntaxj-2014-0019Search in Google Scholar
Garfunkel, Nicholas. 2010. “Are all CFC-regimes the Same? The impact of the Attribution Method.” Tax Notes International 59 (1): 53– 74.GarfunkelNicholas2010“Are all CFC-regimes the Same? The impact of the Attribution Method.”5915374Search in Google Scholar
Gerson, Anna. 2013. “Sweden.” In Cahiers de droit fiscal international 98a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 703–22. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.GersonAnna2013“Sweden.”70322The Hague: SDU UitgiversSearch in Google Scholar
Gjems-Onstad, Ole, SanazOrmaz Ferdowsi, Benn Folkvord, and Eivind Furuseth. 2015. Norsk Bedriftsskatteret. Oslo: Gyldendal Juridisk.Gjems-OnstadOleSanaz OrmazFerdowsiBennFolkvordEivindFuruseth2015OsloGyldendal JuridiskSearch in Google Scholar
Graetz, Michael. 2001. “Inadequate Principles, Outdated Concepts and Unsatisfactory Policies.” Tax Law Review 25, 261–336.GraetzMichael2001“Inadequate Principles, Outdated Concepts and Unsatisfactory Policies.”25261336Search in Google Scholar
Gudmundsson, Bogi and Páll Jóhannesson. 2010. “Compatibility of the Icelandic CFC Rule with the EEA Freedoms.” European Taxation 50 (12), 535–44.GudmundssonBogiPállJóhannesson2010“Compatibility of the Icelandic CFC Rule with the EEA Freedoms.”501253544Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, Anders Oreby and Poul Erik Lytken. 2012. ”CFC-regler på tynd is?”. SkatUdland (141), 252–61.HansenAnders OrebyPoulErik Lytken2012”CFC-regler på tynd is?”14125261Search in Google Scholar
Haslehner, Werner. 2016. The Commission Proposal for an Anti-BEPS Directive: Some Preliminary Comments. http://www.kluwertaxblog.com/2016/02/05/the-commissionproposal-for-an-anti-beps-directive-some-preliminarycomments/ Kluwer. Accessed 5 February 2016.HaslehnerWerner2016The Commission Proposal for an Anti-BEPS Directive: Some Preliminary Comments. http://www.kluwertaxblog.com/2016/02/05/the-commissionproposal-for-an-anti-beps-directive-some-preliminarycomments/ KluwerSearch in Google Scholar
Helminen, Marjaana. 2015. “EU Tax Law – Direct Taxation (electronic version).” Amsterdam: IBFD.HelminenMarjaana2015“EU Tax Law – Direct Taxation (electronic version).”Search in Google Scholar
Helminen, Marjaana. 2011. “Better Late Than Never – The Finnish CFC Case and the Requirement to Repeal Finnish Decisions That Conflict with EU Law.” European Taxation 51 (7), 314–18.HelminenMarjaana2011“Better Late Than Never – The Finnish CFC Case and the Requirement to Repeal Finnish Decisions That Conflict with EU Law.”51731418Search in Google Scholar
Helminen, Marjaana. 2009. “Amendments to Finland’s CFC-regime.” Bulletin for International Taxation 63 (4), 163–5.HelminenMarjaana2009“Amendments to Finland’s CFC-regime.”6341635Search in Google Scholar
Helminen, Marjaana. 2004. “National Report Finland.” In CFC Legislation, Tax Treaties and EC Law, edited by Michael Lang, Hans-JörgenAigner, Ulrich Scheurle, and Markus Stefaner, 204-12. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.HelminenMarjaana2004“National Report Finland.”MichaelLangHans-JörgenAignerUlrichScheurleMarkusStefaner20412The HagueKluwer Law InternationalSearch in Google Scholar
Hilling, Maria. 2013. “Justifcations and Proportionality: An Analysis of the ECJ’s Assessment of National Rules for the Prevention of Tax Avoidance.” Intertax 41 (5), 294–307.HillingMaria2013“Justifcations and Proportionality: An Analysis of the ECJ’s Assessment of National Rules for the Prevention of Tax Avoidance.”41529430710.54648/TAXI2013025Search in Google Scholar
Hilling, Maria. 2008. ”The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court Totally Disregards Tax Treaty: A Critical Analysis of a CFC Judgment.” Intertax 36 (10), 455–61.HillingMaria2008”The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court To-tally Disregards Tax Treaty: A Critical Analysis of a CFC Judgment.”36104556110.54648/TAXI2008066Search in Google Scholar
Husa, Jaakko, Kimmo Nuotio, and HeikkuPihlajamäki. 2008.: “Nordic Law–Between Tradition and Dynamism.” InNordic Law–Between Tradition and Dynamism edited by Jaakko Husa, Kimmo Nuotio, and HeikkuPihlajamäki, 1-40. Oxford: Intersentia.HusaJaakkoKimmoNuotioHeikkuPihlajamäki2008“Nordic Law–Between Tradition and Dynamism.”JaakkoHusaKimmoNuotioHeikkuPihlajamäki140OxfordIntersentiaSearch in Google Scholar
Lindström-Ihre, Lenaand, and Robert Karlsson. 2008. “De nya CFC reglerna – är en verklig etablering afärsmässig eller ej?.” Skattenytt (10), 605–16.Lindström-IhreLenaandRobertKarlsson2008“De nya CFC reglerna – är en verklig etablering afärsmässig eller ej?.”1060516Search in Google Scholar
Isenbergh, Joseph. 2008. International Taxation – U.S. Taxation of Foreign Persons and Foreign Income. Chicago: CCH.IsenberghJoseph2008ChicagoCCHSearch in Google Scholar
Jiménez, Martín. 2012. “Towards a Homogeneous Theory of Abuse in EU (Direct) Tax Law.” Bulletin of International Tax Law 66 (4/5), 270–92.JiménezMartín2012“Towards a Homogeneous Theory of Abuse in EU (Direct) Tax Law.”664/527092Search in Google Scholar
Kleist, David. 2008. “Någraytterligara kommentarer angåendeförhål-landetmellamskatteavtalenoch intern rätt.” Skattenytt (11), 708– 14.KleistDavid2008“Någraytterligara kommentarer angåendeförhållandetmellamskatteavtalenoch intern rätt.”1170814Search in Google Scholar
Kraft, Gerhard and Diana Beck. 2012. “Fifty Years of Subpart F Revisited in the Light of Modified Economic Conditions.” Intertax 40 (12), 683–90.KraftGerhardDianaBeck2012“Fifty Years of Subpart F Revisited in the Light of Modified Economic Conditions.”40126839010.54648/TAXI2012071Search in Google Scholar
Kristofersen, Eleonor. 2015. “Comparative studies of national law in the EU harmonized VAT.” Nordic Tax Journal (2 – ahead of print).KristofersenEleonor2015“Comparative studies of national law in the EU harmonized VAT.”(2 – ahead of print)10.1515/ntaxj-2015-0011Search in Google Scholar
Kuzniacki, Blazej: “The Need to Avoid Double Economic Taxation Triggered by CFC Rules under Tax Treaties, and the Way to Achieve it.” Intertax 43 (12), 758–72.KuzniackiBlazej“The Need to Avoid Double Economic Taxation Trig-gered by CFC Rules under Tax Treaties, and the Way to Achieve it.”43127587210.54648/TAXI2015070Search in Google Scholar
Leväjärvi, Nina. 2013. “Finland.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 98a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 289–97. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.LeväjärviNina2013“Finland.”28997The Hague: SDU UitgiversSearch in Google Scholar
Lokken, Lawrance.2005. “Whatever HappenedtoSubpartF?U.S.CFC Legislation after the Check-the-Box Regulations.” Florida Tax Law Review (7), 185–209.LokkenLawrance2005“Whatever HappenedtoSubpartF?U.S.CFC Legislation after the Check-the-Box Regulations.”718520910.5744/ftr.2005.1033Search in Google Scholar
Michelsen, Aage. “Kommentar til udvalgte afgørelser – CFC-beskatning – forholdet til dobbeltbeskatningsoverenskomsterne og EU-retten. Revision & Regnskabsvæsen (1), SM 2-5.MichelsenAage“Kommentar til udvalgte afgørelser – CFC-beskatning – forholdet til dobbeltbeskatningsoverenskomsterne og EU-retten125Search in Google Scholar
Naas, Henning, Christian Bruusgaard, Kristine Ilstad, and Kristian Svensen. 2011. NorskInternasjonalSkatterett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.NaasHenningChristianBruusgaardKristineIlstadKristianSvensen2011OsloUniversitets-forlagetSearch in Google Scholar
Meussen, G.T.K. 2007. “Cadbury Schweppes: The ECJ Significantly Limits the Application of CFC Rules in the Member States.” European Taxation 47 (1), 13–18.MeussenG.T.K.2007“Cadbury Schweppes: The ECJ Significantly Limits the Application of CFC Rules in the Member States.”4711318Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015a. “Designing Effective Controlled Foreign Company Rules, Action 3, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015a“Designing Effective Controlled Foreign Company Rules, Action 3, Final Report.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015b.”Explanatory Statement – Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015b”Explanatory Statement – Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015c: “Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account Transparency and Substance, Action 5, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015c“Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account Transparency and Substance, Action 5, Final Report.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015d: Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances, Action 6, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015dPreventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances, Action 6, Final Report.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015e: Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, Action 1, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015eAddressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, Action 1, Final Report.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015f: “Neutralizing the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements, Action 2, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015f“Neutralizing the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements, Action 2, Final Report.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015g: “Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and other Financial Payments, Action 4, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015g“Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and other Financial Payments, Action 4, Final Report.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty). 2015h: “Aligning Transfer Pricing Rules with Value Creation, Action 8-10, Final Report.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD/G20 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Group of Twenty)2015h“Aligning Transfer Pricing Rules with Value Creation, Action 8-10, Final Report.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013a. “Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)2013a“Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013b. “Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)2013b“Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1998. “Harmful Tax Competition – An Emerging Global Issue.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)1998“Harmful Tax Competition – An Emerging Global Issue.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1996. “Controlled Foreign Company Legislation.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)1996“Controlled Foreign Company Legislation.”Search in Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1987. “Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of Base Companies.” Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)1987“Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of Base Compa-nies.”Search in Google Scholar
Panayi, Christiana HJI. 2016. “The Compatibility of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Proposals with EU Law”. Bulletin for International Taxation 70 (1-2): 95–112.PanayiChristiana HJI2016“The Compatibility of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Proposals with EU Law”701-295112Search in Google Scholar
Passalacqua, Anna and Lars Henie. 2008. “The Norwegian CFC Rules after the Cadbury Schweppes Case.” Intertax 36 (8/9), 378–88.PassalacquaAnnaLarsHenie2008“The Norwegian CFC Rules after the Cadbury Schweppes Case.”368/93788810.54648/TAXI2008053Search in Google Scholar
Pistone, Pasquale. 2014. “Coordinating the Actions of Regional and Global Players during the Shift from BilateralismtoMultilateralism in International Tax Law.” World Tax Journal 6 (1), 3–9.PistonePasquale2014“Coordinating the Actions of Regional and Global Players during the Shift from BilateralismtoMultilateralism in International Tax Law.”6139Search in Google Scholar
Rapakko, Annamaria. 1989. Base Company Taxation. Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.RapakkoAnnamaria1989BostonKluwer Law and Taxation PublishersSearch in Google Scholar
Rust, Alexander. 2008. ”CFC Legislation and EC Law.” Intertax 36 (11), 492–501.RustAlexander2008”CFC Legislation and EC Law.”361149250110.54648/TAXI2008072Search in Google Scholar
Rønfieldt, Thomas. 2010. Skatteværn og EU-frihed: Værnsregler i dansk skatteret konfronteret med fællesskabsrettens frihedsrettigheder som dynamisk udviklet af EF-domstolen. Copenhagen: Jurist-og Økonomforbundets Forlag.RønfieldtThomas2010Skatteværn og EU-frihed: Værnsregler i dansk skatteret konfronteret med fællesskabsrettens frihedsret-tigheder som dynamisk udviklet af EF-domstolenSearch in Google Scholar
Samuelson, Lars and Christian Karlsson. 2010. ”Skatteverketsförslag til ändringer i CFC Lägstiftningen.” Skattenytt (7/8), 530– 36.SamuelsonLarsChristianKarlsson2010”Skatteverkets-förslag til ändringer i CFC Lägstiftningen.”7/853036Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Daniel. 1998. Tax Treaties and Controlled Foreign Company Legislation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.SandlerDaniel1998The HagueKluwer Law InternationalSearch in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2016. ”Taxation of Income in Foreign Trusts: Denmark Introduces New Anti-avoidance Rule Targeting the Use of Foreign Trusts.” Intertax 44 (2), 185–91.SchmidtPeter Koerver2016”Taxation of Income in Foreign Trusts: Denmark Introduces New Anti-avoidance Rule Targeting the Use of Foreign Trusts.”4421859110.54648/TAXI2016013Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2014. “Are the Danish CFC Rules in Conflict with the Freedom of Establishment? – An Analysis of the Danish CFC Regime in Light of ECJ Case Law.” European Taxation 54 (1), 3–9.SchmidtPeter Koerver2014“Are the Danish CFC Rules in Conflict with the Freedom of Establishment? – An Analysis of the Danish CFC Regime in Light of ECJ Case Law.”139Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2013a. Dansk CFC-beskatning – i et internationalt og komparativt perspektiv. Copenhagen: Karnov Group.SchmidtPeter Koerver2013aDansk CFC-beskatning – i etCopenhagenKarnov GroupSearch in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter Koerver. 2013b. “Denmark.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 98a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 259-77. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.SchmidtPeter Koerver2013b“Denmark.”25977The HagueSDU UitgiversSearch in Google Scholar
Schön, Wolfgang. 2012. “Taxing Multinationals in Europe – Working Paper 11. Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance Research Paper Series.SchönWolfgang2012“Taxing Multinationals in Europe – Working Paper 11Search in Google Scholar
Svensen, Christian. 2013. “Norway.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 98a, 547-59. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.SvensenChristian2013“Norway.”98a54759The HagueSDU UitgiversSearch in Google Scholar
Terra, Ben and Peter Wattel. 2012. European Tax Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.TerraBenPeterWattel2012Alphen aan den RijnKluwer Law InternationalSearch in Google Scholar
Weeghel, Steff van. 2010. “General Report.” In Cahiers de droit fscal international 95a, edited by International Fiscal Association, 17-55. The Hague: SDU Uitgivers.WeeghelSteff van2010“General Report.”1755The HagueSDU UitgiversSearch in Google Scholar
Wenehed, Lars-Erik. 2000. CFC-lagstiftningen – en studie av CFC-beskattning I belysning av den internationellabeskattningsrättensutsträkning, den internationellaskatterätten, neutral beskattning samt beskatning efter skatteförmåga. Lund: Juristförlaget.WenehedLars-Erik2000LundJuristförlagetSearch in Google Scholar
Zimmer, Frederik. 2009. Internasjonalinntektsskatterett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.ZimmerFrederik2009OsloUniversitetsforlagetSearch in Google Scholar