[Alanen, R. (2000). Kolmannen muodon tapaus: Miten kieliopista puhutaan englannin kielen luokassa. In Teoksessa P. Kalaja & L. Nieminen (toim.), Kielikoulussa – kieli koulussa (s. 139–163). AFinLAn vuosikirja, 58. Jyväskylä: Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys AFinLA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J. R. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergman, J., Oksanen, H., & Veikkolainen, K. (2009). Viestinnällisyys ranskan oppikirjojen tehtävissä Suomessa, Ruotsissa ja Kanadassa. Pedagoginen tutkielma. Aineenopettajankoulutus. Soveltavan kasvatustieteen laitos. Helsingin yliopisto.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, S. (1999). The use of grammatical strategy in the second language classroom: A qualitative study of teachers' practices and cognition. Applied Linguistics, 20, 95–126.10.1093/applin/20.1.95]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, D. H. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[CEFR = Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (2001). Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division, Strasbourg. Council of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Díaz, C., Alarcón, P., & Ortiz, M. (2015). A case study on EFL teachers’ beliefs about the teaching and learning of English in public education. Revista Porta Linguarum, 21, 171–86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Díaz, C., & Morales, H. (2015). Creencias de estudiantes de primaria sobre el aprendizaje del inglés en un establecimiento educacional chileno. Revista Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 15(1), 1–21. Universidad de Costa Rica.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and pedagogy. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.10.1002/9781118271643]Search in Google Scholar
[Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325–353.10.3138/cmlr.61.3.325]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Glass, K. (2013). Teaching English in Chile: A Study of Teacher Perceptions of their Professional Identity, Student Motivation and Pertinent Learning Contents. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Edition.10.3726/978-3-653-03076-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Harjanne, P. (2006). “Mut ei tää oo hei midsommarista!” – ruotsin kielen viestinnällinen suullinen harjoittelu yhteistoiminnallisten skeema- ja elaborointitehtävien avulla. Helsingin yliopisto. Soveltavan kasvatustieteen laitos. Tutkimuksia 273. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/kay/sovel/vk/harjanne/]Search in Google Scholar
[Harjanne, P., & Tella, S. (2007). Task-based language teaching: Challenging emphases. Poster presentation at 2nd International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching. 20.–22.9.2007. Honolulu, USA. Retrieved May 29, 2016 from http://www.hawaii.edu/tblt2007/PP/presentations.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Harjanne, P., & Tella, S. (2008). Vieraiden kielten opetuksen didaktisia, yhteiskunnallisia ja metodologisia lähtökohtia – tutkimushankkeen teoreettisen taustan kehittelyä. Teoksessa A. Kallioniemi (toim.), Uudistuva ja kehittyvä ainedidaktiikka: Ainedidaktinen symposiumi 8.2.2008 Helsingissä. Osa 2 (s. 737–750). Helsingin yliopisto. Soveltavan kasvatustieteen laitos. Tutkimuksia 299. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://www.seppotella.fi/harjannetella299.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinkkanen, H.-M., & Säde, A.-M. (2003). Puhutaanko kielestä vai kielellä? Tapaustutkimus englannin kielen tunnilla käytetyn kielen kohteista, sisällöistä ja merkityksistä. Kasvatustieteen pro gradu -tutkielma. Opettajankoulutuslaitos. Jyväskylän yliopisto. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/10443/G0000201.pdf?sequence=1]Search in Google Scholar
[Jalkanen, L. & Ruuska, J. (2007). Affektiiviset tekijät vieraan kielen opiskelussa: Tapaustutkimus alakoulun englannin tunneista oppilaiden kokemana. Kasvatustieteen pro gradu -tutkielma. Opettajankoulutuslaitos. Jyväskylän yliopisto. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/10684/URN_NBN_fi_jyu-2007883.pdf?sequence=1]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaukonen, H. (2010). L’entraînement à la production écrite dans des manuels de français et d'anglais : un point de vue communicationnel. Mémoire de master. Institut des langues modernes et classiques, Université de Jyväskylä. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201011093076]Search in Google Scholar
[Kivilahti, S. & P. Kalaja. (2013). Kirjoitustehtävät englannin ja ruotsin kielen opetuksessa: oppikirja-analyysia. Föredrag. Språkpedagogik-konferens “Merkitys ja merkityksellistäminen kielenopetuksessa” (KieliPeda 2013), 16.5. 2013, Jyväskylä.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lantolf, J. (Ed.) (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikula, T. (2007). The IRF pattern and space for interaction: Comparing CLIL and EFL classrooms. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse (pp. 179–204). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunan, D. (Ed.) (1992). Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards, J. C., & Rogers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Language Teaching Library.10.1017/9781009024532]Search in Google Scholar
[Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27, 4–13.10.3102/0013189X027002004]Search in Google Scholar
[Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching 36, 1–14.10.1017/S026144480200188X]Search in Google Scholar
[Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken: Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. Stockholm: Prisma. The assessment of pupils' skills in English in eight European countries (2002). A European Project commissioned by The European network of policy makers for the evaluation of education systems. (Edited by Gérard Bonnet.) Retrieved April 18, 2009, from http://cisad.adc.education.fr/reva/pdf/assessmentofenglish.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT Journal 50, 9–15.10.1093/elt/50.1.9]Search in Google Scholar
[van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245–259.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar