[1. Valerianova Z, Dimitrova N, Vuzov M, Atanasov T. Overview of cancer incidence, mortality, prevalence and survival in Bulgaria. In: Valerianova Z, Dimitrova N, Vuzov M, Atanasov, editors. Cancer incidence in Bulgaria, 2013. Sofia: Paradigma; 2015; p. 25-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Lacambra MD, Lam CC, Mendoza P, Chan SK, Yu AM, Tsang JY, et al. Biopsy sampling of breast lesions: comparison of core needleand vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(3):917-23.10.1007/s10549-011-1639-3]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Ahmed ME, Ahmad I, Akhtar S. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology versus core biopsy in the preoperative assessment of non-palpable breast lesions. JAyub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(2):138-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Brunner AH, Sagmeister T, Kremer J, Riss P, Brustmann H. The accuracy of frozen section analysis in ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of breast lesions. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:341.10.1186/1471-2407-9-341]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Caruso ML, Gabrieli G, Marzullo G, Pirrelli M, Rizzi E, Sorino F. Core biopsy as alternative to Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in diagnosis of breast tumors. Oncologist. 1998;3(1):45-9.10.1634/theoncologist.3-1-45]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Florentine BD, Cobb CJ, Frankel K, Greaves T, Martin S. Core needle biopsy:auseful adjunct to fine-needle aspiration in select patients with palpable breast cancer. Cancer Pathol. 1997;81:33-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Linebarger J, Landercasper J, Ellis R, Gundrum J, Marcou K, De Maiffe Br, et al. Core needle biopsy rate for new cancer diagnosis in an interdisciplinary breast center evaluation of quality of care 2007-2008. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):38-43.10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823e00bf]Search in Google Scholar
[8. James TA, Mace JL, Virnig BA, Geller BM. Preoperative needle biopsy improves the quality of breast cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(4):562-8.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.022]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Van Diest J, Torrenga H, Borgstein J, Pijpers R, Bleichrodt P, Rahusen D, et al. Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Histopathology. 1999;35:14-8.10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00667.x]Search in Google Scholar
[10.Weiser MR, Montgomery LL, Susnik B, Tan LK, Borgen PI, Cody HS. Is routine intraoperative frozen-section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer worthwhile?Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:651-55.]Search in Google Scholar
[11.Chao C, Wong S, Ackermann D, Simpson D, Carter M, Brown M, et al. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2001;182(6):609-15.10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00794-2]Search in Google Scholar
[12.Kulkarni D, Irvine T, Reyes RJ. The use of core biopsy imprint cytology in the 'one-stop' breast clinic. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(10):1037-40.10.1016/j.ejso.2009.02.00919268520]Search in Google Scholar
[13.Homesh NA, Issa MA, El-Sofiani HA. The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy for palpable breast lump(s). Saudi Med J. 2005;26(1):42-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[14.Bdour M, Hourani S, Mefleh W, Shabatat A, Karadsheh S, Nawaiseh O, et al. Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology and tru-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer. J Surg Pak. 2008;13(1):19-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[15.Hussain S, Rikabi A.Diagnostic usefulness of Tru-Cut biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions.Oman Med J. 2013;28(2):125-27.10.5001/omj.2013.32362820023599882]Search in Google Scholar
[16.Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, Koot VC, Borel Rinkes IH, Mali WP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: ametaanalysis. Br JCancer. 2000;82(5):1017-21.10.1054/bjoc.1999.1036237442410737383]Search in Google Scholar