Original Article. Diagnostic Value of Tru-Cut Biopsy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions

1. Valerianova Z, Dimitrova N, Vuzov M, Atanasov T. Overview of cancer incidence, mortality, prevalence and survival in Bulgaria. In: Valerianova Z, Dimitrova N, Vuzov M, Atanasov, editors. Cancer incidence in Bulgaria, 2013. Sofia: Paradigma; 2015; p. 25-7.Search in Google Scholar

2. Lacambra MD, Lam CC, Mendoza P, Chan SK, Yu AM, Tsang JY, et al. Biopsy sampling of breast lesions: comparison of core needleand vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(3):917-23.10.1007/s10549-011-1639-3Search in Google Scholar

3. Ahmed ME, Ahmad I, Akhtar S. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology versus core biopsy in the preoperative assessment of non-palpable breast lesions. JAyub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(2):138-42.Search in Google Scholar

4. Brunner AH, Sagmeister T, Kremer J, Riss P, Brustmann H. The accuracy of frozen section analysis in ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of breast lesions. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:341.10.1186/1471-2407-9-341Search in Google Scholar

5. Caruso ML, Gabrieli G, Marzullo G, Pirrelli M, Rizzi E, Sorino F. Core biopsy as alternative to Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in diagnosis of breast tumors. Oncologist. 1998;3(1):45-9.10.1634/theoncologist.3-1-45Search in Google Scholar

6. Florentine BD, Cobb CJ, Frankel K, Greaves T, Martin S. Core needle biopsy:auseful adjunct to fine-needle aspiration in select patients with palpable breast cancer. Cancer Pathol. 1997;81:33-9.Search in Google Scholar

7. Linebarger J, Landercasper J, Ellis R, Gundrum J, Marcou K, De Maiffe Br, et al. Core needle biopsy rate for new cancer diagnosis in an interdisciplinary breast center evaluation of quality of care 2007-2008. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):38-43.10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823e00bfSearch in Google Scholar

8. James TA, Mace JL, Virnig BA, Geller BM. Preoperative needle biopsy improves the quality of breast cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(4):562-8.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.022Search in Google Scholar

9. Van Diest J, Torrenga H, Borgstein J, Pijpers R, Bleichrodt P, Rahusen D, et al. Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Histopathology. 1999;35:14-8.10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00667.xSearch in Google Scholar

10.Weiser MR, Montgomery LL, Susnik B, Tan LK, Borgen PI, Cody HS. Is routine intraoperative frozen-section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer worthwhile?Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:651-55.Search in Google Scholar

11.Chao C, Wong S, Ackermann D, Simpson D, Carter M, Brown M, et al. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2001;182(6):609-15.10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00794-2Search in Google Scholar

12.Kulkarni D, Irvine T, Reyes RJ. The use of core biopsy imprint cytology in the 'one-stop' breast clinic. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(10):1037-40.10.1016/j.ejso.2009.02.00919268520Search in Google Scholar

13.Homesh NA, Issa MA, El-Sofiani HA. The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy for palpable breast lump(s). Saudi Med J. 2005;26(1):42-6.Search in Google Scholar

14.Bdour M, Hourani S, Mefleh W, Shabatat A, Karadsheh S, Nawaiseh O, et al. Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology and tru-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer. J Surg Pak. 2008;13(1):19-21.Search in Google Scholar

15.Hussain S, Rikabi A.Diagnostic usefulness of Tru-Cut biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions.Oman Med J. 2013;28(2):125-27.10.5001/omj.2013.32362820023599882Search in Google Scholar

16.Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, Koot VC, Borel Rinkes IH, Mali WP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: ametaanalysis. Br JCancer. 2000;82(5):1017-21.10.1054/bjoc.1999.1036237442410737383Search in Google Scholar