<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Freedom of expression is one of the prerequisites for the formation and existence of a democratic society; it belongs among the universal values of paramount importance, because it allows not only to freely express own views, but also reveal the potential of the individual. In addition, it is considered (and it is justified) as one of the main and unconditional achievements of the political reform that is being carried out in Ukraine. The guarantee of freedom of expression, which has the highest political normative content, is, on the one hand, the most important asset of an organic constitution, and on the other hand, serves as the main function of the constitution as a legal source that reflects and responds to the interests of civil society.</p><p>However, the real challenge for the unsustainable constitutional tradition that still retains some signs of the post-Soviet model of regulation is the need to balance freedom of expression under the conditions of threats to national security. What should be the proper mechanism for guaranteeing freedom of expression at the constitutional level? How strong is the danger that the state violates the requirement of constitutionality in the case of restrictions on freedom of expression for the sake of national security? How does the post-Soviet tradition of legal regulation manifest itself in deciding which model of guaranteeing freedom of expression is chosen by the state? What is the role of the tradition of respect for personal autonomy and the value of tolerance of a society in guaranteeing freedom of expression? The article is devoted to finding answers to these questions.</p></abstract>

Freedom of expression is one of the prerequisites for the formation and existence of a democratic society; it belongs among the universal values of paramount importance, because it allows not only to freely express own views, but also reveal the potential of the individual. In addition, it is considered (and it is justified) as one of the main and unconditional achievements of the political reform that is being carried out in Ukraine. The guarantee of freedom of expression, which has the highest political normative content, is, on the one hand, the most important asset of an organic constitution, and on the other hand, serves as the main function of the constitution as a legal source that reflects and responds to the interests of civil society.However, the real challenge for the unsustainable constitutional tradition that still retains some signs of the post-Soviet model of regulation is the need to balance freedom of expression under the conditions of threats to national security. What should be the proper mechanism for guaranteeing freedom of expression at the constitutional level? How strong is the danger that the state violates the requirement of constitutionality in the case of restrictions on freedom of expression for the sake of national security? How does the post-Soviet tradition of legal regulation manifest itself in deciding which model of guaranteeing freedom of expression is chosen by the state? What is the role of the tradition of respect for personal autonomy and the value of tolerance of a society in guaranteeing freedom of expression? The article is devoted to finding answers to these questions.

Freedom of Expression in Ukraine: (Non)sustainable Constitutional Tradition

Theory of Law and Legal Philosophy Department

TalTech Journal of European Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Freedom of Expression in Ukraine: (Non)sustainable Constitutional Tradition"}

Freedom of expression is one of the prerequisites for the formation and existence of a democratic society; it belongs among the universal values of paramount...

Freedom of Expression in Ukraine: (Non)sustainable Constitutional Tradition

Pubblicato online: 21 dic 2019

Pagine: 25 - 42

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0020

Parole chiave
constitution, constitutionalism, democracy, guarantee of freedom of expression, liberty, post-Soviet legal tradition, personal autonomy, restriction of freedom of expression

© 2019 Tatiana Slinko et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Freedom of Expression in Ukraine: (Non)sustainable Constitutional Tradition

Pubblicato online: 21 dic 2019

Pagine: 25 - 42

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0020

Parole chiaveconstitution, constitutionalism, democracy, guarantee of freedom of expression, liberty, post-Soviet legal tradition, personal autonomy, restriction of freedom of expression

© 2019 Tatiana Slinko et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Parole chiave
constitution, constitutionalism, democracy, guarantee of freedom of expression, liberty, post-Soviet legal tradition, personal autonomy, restriction of freedom of expression