[Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part and Georgia, of the other part, 27.06.14, date of publication 11.09.14, temporary application mode 01.09.14, date of full entry into force 01.04.16, OJ L261/4, 30.08.2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barker, K. & Jensen, D., eds. (2013), Private Law: Key Encounters with Public Law, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139856478]Search in Google Scholar
[Basedow, J. (2005), ‘Towards a universal doctrine of breach of contract: the impact of the CISG,’ International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 25, pp. 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2006.02.00910.1016/j.irle.2006.02.009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bassenge, P.et al., eds. (2019), Palandt Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 78. Auflage, München: Verlag C. H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Principles of European Contract Law (2002), Parts I and II – Revised 1998, Part III, pp. xxi–xxii.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, K. P. (2001), ‘Principles of European Contract Law and the Concept of the Creeping Codification of Law,’ European Review of Private Law, vol. 1, pp. 21–34.10.1023/A:1011290501101]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, K. P. (2010), The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria, 2nd revised ed., Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brunner, Ch. (2009), Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-performance in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International BV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bueno Diaz, O. (2008), Franchising in European Contract Law, Schriften zur Europäischer Rechtswissenschaft, vol. 8, Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burduli, I. (2018), ‘Nekrorezeption in Transformationsgesellschaftenin,’ in M. Brinkmann, B. Völzmann-Stickelbrock & D. O. Effer-Uhe (eds.) Dogmatik im Dienst von Gerechtigkeit, Rechtssicherheit und Rechtsentwicklung: Festschrift für Hanns Prütting, Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, pp. 3–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chachava, S. (2004), ‘Retrieval of property from illegal possession,’ [in Georgian] Georgian Law Review, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 760–782.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chanturia, L.; Zoidze, B.; Ninidze, T.; Shengelia, R. & Khetsuriani, J., eds. (2001), Commentary on Georgian Civil Code, Book III: Law of Obligations, General Part, [in Georgian] Tbilisi: Publishing House “Samartali”.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chechelashvili, Z. (2006), Property Law, [in Georgian] Tbilisi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen-Wishart, M.; Loke, A. & Ong, B. (2016), Remedies for Breach of Contract, Studies in the Contract Law of Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Online.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757221.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Chochia, A. (2013), Models of European Integration: Georgia’s Economic and Political Transition, Dissertation Thesis, TUT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chochia, A. & Popjanevski, J. (2016), ‘Change of power and its influence on country’s Europeanization process. Case study: Georgia,’ in T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (eds.) Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_1310.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_13]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ciematniece, I. (2010), Contract Renegotiation and Adaptation, Concept of Contract Renegotiation and Adaptation in International Commercial Law Contracts, Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia, No. 3K-624-02, 09.09.2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[DiMatteo, L. A.; Zhou Q.; Saintier, S. & Rowley, K. (2013), Commercial Contract Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113923566210.1017/CBO9781139235662]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dzneladze, N. (2007), ‘Legal challenges of retrieval of property from illegal possession and property of property right,’ [in Georgian] Martlmsajuleba [Justice], no. 2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedmann, D. (1995), ‘The performance interest in contract damages,’ Law Quarterly Review, vol. 111, pp. 628–654.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gegenava, D., ed. (2013), ‘Preface,’ [in Georgian] Collection of Articles Lado Chanturia 50: Anniversary Edition, Tbilisi: Davit Batonishvili Law Institute, p. 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[German Civil Code (2005), Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Saarbrücken: Juris GmbH.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Sculdrechts, Vom 26.11.2001, verkündet in Jahrgang 2001 Nr. 61 vom 29.11.2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hesselink, M. (2010), Scope and Content of an Optional Instrument for EU Contract Law, Briefing Paper for the European Parliament Interparliamentary Committee Meeting on an Optional Instrument for EU Contract Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[Joerges, C. (2005), ‘Europeanization as process: thoughts on the Europeanization of private law,’ European Public Law, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–84.10.54648/EURO2005007]Search in Google Scholar
[Jugheli, G.et al., ed. (2014), Contract Law, [in Georgian] Tbilisi: Meridiani.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keirse, A. L. M. (2011), ‘European impact on contract law: a perspective on the interlinked contributions of legal scholars, legislators and courts to the Europeanization of contract law,’ Utrecht Law Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–42. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.14510.18352/ulr.145]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreitner D. (2005), ‘Multiplicity in contract remedies,’ in N. Cohen & E. McKendrick (eds.) Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract, Portland, OR: Hart Pub lish ing, pp. 19–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kropholler, J. (2014), German Civil Code, Study Comments, [in Georgian] Tbilisi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurzynsky-Singer, E. & Zarandia, T. (2014), ‘Rezeption des deutschen Sachenrechts in Georgien,’ in E: Krzynsky-Singer (ed.) Transformation durch Rezeption?’ Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, vol. 102, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-153320-410.1628/978-3-16-153320-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lando, O. (1974), ‘The EC draft convention on the law applicable to contractual and non-contractual obligations,’ Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 6–55.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lando, O. (2008), ‘Optional or mandatory Europeanisation of contract law,’ European Review of Private Law, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–69.10.1023/A:1008779604431]Search in Google Scholar
[Lando, O. & Beale, H. (2000), Principles of European Contract Law, Part I, II, The Hague, London & Boston: Kluwer Law International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-575-9_2410.1007/978-90-6704-575-9_24]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Letto-Vanamo, P. & J. Smits, J., eds. (2012), Coherence and Fragmentation in European Private Law, Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers.10.1515/9783866539655]Search in Google Scholar
[Löwisch, M. (2003), ‘New law of obligations in Germany,’ Ritsumeikan Law Review, no. 20, pp. 141–156.]Search in Google Scholar
[Markesinis, S. B.; Unberath, H. & Johnston, A. (2006), The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mátyás, I. (2008), ‘Current issues in the unification of European contract law,’ European Integration Studies, Miskolc, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, L. (2011), The Emerge of EU Contract Law – Exploring Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606627.003.000710.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606627.003.0007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Paul, B. S. (1999), The Futility of Unification and Harmonization in International Commercial Law, University of Virginia School of Law, Legal Studies, Working Paper, no. 99-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Putkaradze, I. (2001), ‘Gratuitous contracts in Georgian law,’ [in Georgian] Georgian Law Review, no. 2, pp. 17–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Riesenfeld, S. (1993), ‘The impact of German legal ideas and institutions on legal thought and institutions in the United States,’ in M. Reimann (ed.) The Reception of Continental Ideas in the Common Law World 1820–1920, vol. 13, Berlin: Suncker & Humbolt, Berlin, pp. 89–98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ripstein, A. (2009), Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674054516]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosett, A. (1992), ‘Unification, harmonization, restatement, codification, and reform in international commercial law,’ American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 683–697. https://doi.org/10.2307/8405910.2307/84059]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rowan, S. (2012), Remedies for Breach of Contract, a Comparative Analysis of the Protection of Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606603.003.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606603.003.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smits, J. (2012), ‘Coherence and fragmentation in the law of contract,’ in P. Letto-Vanamo & J. Smits (eds.) Coherence and Fragmentation in European Private Law, Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers, pp. 9–24.10.1515/9783866539655.9]Search in Google Scholar
[Surguladze, Iv. (2002), Contract and Law, [in Georgian] translated from German and introduction by O. Gamkrelidze, Tbilisi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zoidze, B. (2003), ‘From the history of creation of Georgian civil code,’ [in Georgian] Georgian Law Review, vol. 6/2003, no. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Troitiño, D. R. & Chochia A. (2011), ‘Georgia and the European Union from the Mediterranean Perspective,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 2, no. 1(11), pp. 81–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Twigg-Flesner, C. (2013), The Europeanisation of Contract Law: Current Controversies in Law, 2nd ed., London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020354937710.4324/9780203549377]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[UN (2010), United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1980, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, New York: United Nations.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNIDROIT (2014), UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT Contract Principles or UPICC), Rome: International Institute for the Unification of Private Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Erp, S. (2012), ‘European property law: a new and rapidly developing area of research and teaching,’ European Property Law Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2012-000110.1515/eplj-2012-0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[von Bar, C.et al., eds. (2009), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law, Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), Study Group on a European Civil Code and Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group), Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers GmbH.10.1515/9783866537279]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, G. (2002), ‘The economics of harmonization: the case of contract law,’ Common Market Law Review, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 995–1023. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102088421020510.1023/A:1020884210205]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Westermann, P. (2012), BGB – Sachenrecht, 12. Auflage, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williston, S. & Lord, R. A. (1990), A Treatise on the Law of Contracts, 4th ed., Eagan, MN: West Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf, M. & Wellenhofer, M. (2016), Sachenrecht, 31. Auflage, Köln: C. H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zarandia, T. (2007), ‘The national character of private law and the necessity of reception,’ [in Georgian] Guram Tavartkiladze Anniversary Collection, Tbilisi: TSUER, pp. 294–304.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zeller, B. (2007), CISG and Unification of International Trade Law, Abingdon & New York: Routledge-Cavendish. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020393288910.4324/9780203932889]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zoidze, B. (2005), Reception of European Private Law in Georgia, [in Georgian] Tbilisi: Tinatin Tsereteli Institute of State and Law of the Academy of Science of Georgia.]Search in Google Scholar