1. bookVolume 17 (2017): Edizione 4 (October 2017)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2300-8733
Prima pubblicazione
25 Nov 2011
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Association of Ejaculate Sperm Counts with their Morphological and Morphometric Characteristics in Hypor Boars

Pubblicato online: 27 Oct 2017
Volume & Edizione: Volume 17 (2017) - Edizione 4 (October 2017)
Pagine: 1043 - 1052
Ricevuto: 01 Feb 2017
Accettato: 12 Jun 2017
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2300-8733
Prima pubblicazione
25 Nov 2011
Frequenza di pubblicazione
4 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Arnaud L., Haubruge E., Gage M.J.G. (2001). Sperm size and number variation in the red flour beetle. Zool. J. Linn. Soc-Lond., 133: 369–375.Search in Google Scholar

Bierła J.B., Giżejewski Z., Leigh C.M., Ekwall H., Söderquist L., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Zalewski K., Breed W.G. (2007). Sperm morphology of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber: an example of a species of rodent with highly derived and pleiomorphic sperm populations. J. Morphol., 268: 683–689.Search in Google Scholar

Blom E. (1981). The morphological estimation of the spermatozoa defects of bull II: The proposal of new classification of spermatozoa defects (in Polish). Med. Weter., 37: 239–242.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero A.E., De Palma A., Grazioso C., Barone N., Romeo R., Rapazzo G., D’Agata R. (2001). Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with abnormal semen parameters. Hum. Reprod., 16: 1172–1179.10.1093/humrep/16.6.1172Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Casey P.J., Gravance C.G., Davis R.O., Chabot D.D., Liu I.K.M. (1997). Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions. Theriogenology, 47: 575–582.10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00015-0Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chenoweth P.J. (2005). Genetic sperm defects. Theriogenology, 64: 457–468.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.005Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

De Jarnette J.M., Saake R.G., Barne J., Volger C.J. (1992). Accessory sperm: their importance to fertility and embryo quality and attempts to alter their numbers in artificially inseminated cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 484–491.10.2527/1992.702484xApri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Enciso M., Cisale H., Johnston S.D., Sarasa J., Fernandez J.L., Gosalvez J. (2011). Major morphological sperm abnormalities in the bull are related to sperm DNA damage. Theriogenology, 76: 23–32.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.034Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Evenson D.P., Wixon R. (2006). Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology, 65: 979–991.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.011Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fischer M.A., Willis J., Zini A. (2003). Human sperm DNA integrity: correlation with sperm cytoplasmic droplets. Urology, 61: 207–211.10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02098-8Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gage M.J.G., Morrow E.H. (2003). Experimental evidence for the evolution of numerous, tiny sperm via sperm competition. Curr. Biol., 13: 754–757.10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00282-3Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gil M.C., Garcia-Herreros M., Baron F.J., Aparicio I.M., Santos A.J., Garcia-Marin L.J. (2009). Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology, 71: 254–263.Search in Google Scholar

Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A., Nazaruk A. (2016). The importance of ejaculate volume for the physical parameters of ejaculates and sperm morphology of Hypor boars. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak., 22: 493–501.Search in Google Scholar

Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A. (2017). Ejaculate traits and sperm morphology depending on ejaculate volume in Duroc boars. J. Vet. Res., 61: 121–125.Search in Google Scholar

Hirai M., Boersma A., Hofflich A., Wolf E., Föll J., Aumüller R., Braun A.J. (2001). Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J. Androl., 22: 104–110.Search in Google Scholar

King G.J., Macpherson J.W. (1973). A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J. Anim. Sci., 36: 563–565.10.2527/jas1973.363563x4693863Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Knecht D., Środoń S., Duziński K. (2014). The influence of boar breed and season on semen parameters. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 1–9.10.4314/sajas.v44i1.1Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Mielnicka C. (2005). The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett., 10: 3–13.Search in Google Scholar

Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Wysokińska A., Sadowska A. (2006). Ejaculate traits and spermatozoa morphology as related to spermatozoa concentration in ejaculates of Polish Large White boars. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., Suppl., 3: 111–119.Search in Google Scholar

Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A., Górski K. (2013). The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Arch. Tierzucht, 56: 1052–1059.Search in Google Scholar

Kondracki S., Górski K., Wysokińska A., Jóźwik I. (2014). Correlation of ejaculate parameters and sperm morphology with the ejaculate volume of Pietrain boars. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 20: 703–709.Search in Google Scholar

Kowalewski D., Kondracki S., Górski K., Bajena M., Wysokińska A. (2016). Effect of piggery microclimate on ejaculate performance of artificial insemination boars. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak., 22: 225–232.Search in Google Scholar

Kubo-Irie M., Matsumiya K., Iwamoto T., Kaneko S., Ishijima S. (2005). Morphological abnormalities in the spermatozoa of fertile and infertile men. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 70: 70–81.10.1002/mrd.2018915515050Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Long J.A., Wildt D.E., Wolfe B.A., Critser J.K., De Rossi R.V., Howard J.G. (1996). Sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction are compromised in teratospermic domestic cats. Biol. Reprod., 54: 638–646.10.1095/biolreprod54.3.6388835386Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Malo A.F., Gomendio M., Garde J., Lang-Lenton B., Soler A.J., Roldan E.R.S. (2006). Sperm design and sperm function. Biol. Lett., 2: 246–249.Search in Google Scholar

Noorafshan A., Karbalay-Doust S. (2010). A simple method for unbiased estimating of ejaculated sperm tail length in subjects with normal and abnormal sperm motility. Micron, 41: 96–99.10.1016/j.micron.2009.09.00219819707Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ostermeier G.C., Sargeant G.A., Yandell B.S., Evenson D.P., Parrish J.J. (2001). Relationship of bull fertility to sperm nuclear shape. J. Androl., 22: 595–603.Search in Google Scholar

Pinart E., Camps R., Briz M.O., Bonet S., Egozcue J. (1998). Unilateral spontaneous abdominal cryptorchidism: structural and ultrastructural study of sperm morphology. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 49: 247–268.Search in Google Scholar

Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development (2010). The Journal of Laws of 15 February, 2010, No. 56, Pos. 344.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Sanchez A.I., O’Donoghue R., Novak S., Dyck M.K., Cosgrove J.R., Dixon W.T., Foxcroft G.R. (2006). The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility. Theriogenology, 66: 736-748.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.12.01216529803Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Smital J., De Sousa L.L., Mohnsen A. (2004). Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 80: 121-130.Search in Google Scholar

Steinholt H.C., Chandler J.E., Baron R.A., Adkinson R.W. (1994). Chromosome and sperm size of Holsteins with and without bovine leukocyte adhesion deficiency. J. Dairy Sci., 77: 1239-1250.Search in Google Scholar

Sun F., Ko R., Martin R.H. (2006). Is there a relationship between sperm chromosome abnormalities and sperm morphology? Reprod. Biol. Endocrin., 4: 1-15.10.1186/1477-7827-4-1139531416436209Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

Swine Nutrition Requirements (1993). The Kielanowski Institute Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences. Omnitech-Press, Warsaw, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V. (2001). Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J. Androl., 22: 382-394.Search in Google Scholar

Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2013). Assessment of the effect of heterosis on semen parameters of two-breed crosses of Duroc, Hampshire and Pietrain boars. Arch. Tierzucht, 56: 65-74.Search in Google Scholar

Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2014 a). Assessment of changes in sperm cell membrane integrity occurring during the storage of semen from genetically different males using two diagnostic methods. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 94: 601–606.10.4141/cjas2013-095Search in Google Scholar

Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2014 b). Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 559-571.10.2478/aoas-2014-0030Search in Google Scholar

Wysokińska A., Kondracki S., Banaszewska D. (2009). Morphometrical characteristics of spermatozoa in Polish Landrace boars with regard to the number of spermatozoa in an ejaculate. Reprod. Biol., 9: 271-282.Search in Google Scholar

Wysokińska A., Kondracki S., Iwanina M. (2015). The usefulness of selected physicochemical indices, cell membrane integrity and sperm chromatin structure in assessments of boar semen sensitivity. Asian Austral. J. Anim., 28: 1713-1720.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng H., Stratton C.J., Morozumi K., Jin J., Yanagimachi R., Yan W. (2007). Lack of Spem 1 causes aberrant cytoplasm removal, sperm deformation, and male infertility. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 104: 6852-6857.Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo