Editorial

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The war in Ukraine threatens global food security. At the same time, the European Union (EU) plans to advance the green transformation of its agro-food sector, which implies lower agricultural output. Relying on the political economy literature, this study examines if the war can thwart the greening ambitions for EU’s agro-food sector. For this, it explores to what extent the war represents an external event that is large enough to change policy preferences and reviews the positions of major political actors who shape agricultural policy on the EU level and in member states regarding the case of Germany, where the ambition for the green transformation of the economy is particularly strong. It is shown that, for the time being, the war does not impede EU’s greening aspirations. Instead, the major political actors play for time, hoping to forward the green transformation after the end of the war.</p>
</abstract>

Can the war in Ukraine thwart the green agricultural transformation in the EU? Political economy considerations regarding the case of Germany

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>There is lack of research on the evaluation of state aid provided to food industry enterprises in Poland, within the framework of general principles of the European Union competition policy, taking into account structure of the industry. The aim of the study is to assess the scale of general public aid for dairies, taking into account the type of enterprises, their size and location. The statistical analysis is based on SUDOP data. The amount of aid granted in 2015–2021 increased as well as the number of beneficiaries of the aid. The highest value share involved subsidies for R&amp;D projects. The share of large dairies in funds is similar to their market share. We witness a significant concentration of aid regionally and among the beneficiaries. Dairy cooperatives accounted for a greater share of the employment of disabled persons and prisoners than other entities, which may be due to their bimodal nature.</p>
</abstract>

The role of state aid for the food industry – Based on the example of dairies in Poland

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<sec>
<h3>Purpose</h3>
<p>Although the open strategizing (OS) approach can bring a wide range of benefits, there are also numerous risks identified. These risks are core sources of organizational dilemmas and challenges that appear in the decision-making process in two dimensions of OS – inclusion and transparency, both of which we further explore.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>
<p>Following the suggestions of some scholars, we have employed the specific context of research and investigated companies from creative industries in Poland. We applied purposeful sampling with maximum sample variation to collect relevant and rich data and identify shared patterns. We conducted in-depth interviews with the owners or CEOs of the chosen creative firms.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<h3>Findings</h3>
<p>We have recognized some recurring fears and anxieties accompanying the OS concept in general and different categories of challenges in particular. This paper suggests that a specific mindset reflected in a particular organizational climate (open climate) might undermine a company’s efforts in considering and adopting such a strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<h3>Originality</h3>
<p>By offering an initial conceptualization of an open climate as a potential further research avenue, this study contributes to the OS stream of research.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>

Wide open? Creative industries and open strategizing challenges

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The main purpose of this paper is to analyze impact of organizational learning (OL) on Polish small- or medium-sized enterprise (SME) performance. Results are based on interviews with owners and managers from two samples of Polish small- and medium-sized firms: a “pre-COVID-19” sample (the survey was conducted during May–July 2019) and a “COVID-19” sample (the survey was conducted during December 2020–January 2021). The results based on the “pre-COVID-19” sample show partial support for the hypothesis about a positive relationship between market performance and OL for Polish SMEs. Two out of three measures of OL, i.e., the diversity of information sources and the commitment to learning, showed positive relationship with two aspects of market performance, i.e., the sales dynamics and the self-assessed success as compared with that of competitors. None of the OL measures have been correlated with the financial results. For the “COVID-19” sample, commitment to learning showed very weak positive correlations with both financial results and sales dynamics. These relationships were not confirmed when other firms’ characteristics had been included.</p>
</abstract>

The impact of organizational learning on Polish SME market performance

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Coopetition has gained considerable attention in the management literature. Yet, the best recognized is inter-organizational coopetition. The intra-organizational coopetition is still under-researched and there is a gap in the comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of intra-organizational coopetition. This paper attempts to identify the main positive outcomes in the coopetition relationship between affiliates within business groups based on a survey questionnaire in the largest business groups listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. The findings of the study reveal that coopetition at the intra-organizational level generates many benefits. The main ones are resource benefits and improved market and financial performance. The positive effects of intra-organizational coopetition are somewhat similar to the benefits of inter-organizational coopetition. However, some differences support the view on the specificity of coopetition at each level.</p>
</abstract>

Does coopetition pay off? Benefits of intra-organizational coopetition within business groups

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The article analyzes changes on the Polish labor market after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. It aims to assess the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the transition of people on the labor market in Poland. The decided majority of research into the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the labor market was based exclusively on resource analysis, omitting stream analysis. This research fills this gap and provides analysis by quarter of the transition of people on the labor market between employment, unemployment, and professional inactivity. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a severe drop in the number of people in work in the second quarter of 2020, similar in level to an analogous increase in the number of people professionally inactive. The effects of the pandemic were much more severe for women than for men. Detailed analysis of transitions on the labor market shows that around 50% of jobs lost due to the outbreak of the pandemic were not regained. Many redundancies were permanent, which may translate into a weakening of the dynamic for the recovery of the labor market in the future.</p>
</abstract>

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the transition of people on the Polish labor market – hidden threats

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 60 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 52 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 1 (September 2016)

Volume 50 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

Volume 49 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 48 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 1 (September 2015)

Volume 46 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)

Volume 45 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 44 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014)

Volume 43 (2014): Issue 1 (September 2014)

Volume 42 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)

Volume 41 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 40 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)

Volume 39 (2013): Issue 1 (September 2013)

Volume 38 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 37 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

International Journal of Management and Economics

 IJME is a platform for scientific discussion and knowledge sharing open for all researchers worldwide.  IJME aims to enhance the body of knowledge in a variety of economic disciplines, such as economy, management, business administration, finance, marketing, logistics, entrepreneurship, etc. IJME is focused on international economic problems and research, however the single country perspective enabling the international comparisons is also welcome.  IJME accepts original works, substantively different from papers previously published or being under review elsewhere.  Rejection Rate   50%   The journal of the SGH WARSAW SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 