À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Anastasiu P., Preda C., Bănăduc D. and Cogălniceanu D., 2017 ‒ Alien species of European Union concern in Romania, Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 19.3, The Wetlands Diversity, ISSN-L 1841-7051, ISSN 2344-3219, 93-106.10.1515/trser-2017-0024Search in Google Scholar

2. Armitage P. D., 1995 ‒ Faunal community change in response to flow manipulation, in The ecological basis for river management, Harper D. M. and Ferguson A. J. D. (eds), Wiley, Chichester, UK, 59-78.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bailey R. C., Kennedy M. G., Dervish M. Z. and Taylor R. M., 1998 ‒ Biological assessment of freshwater ecosystems using a reference approach: comparing predicted and actual benthic invertebrate communities in Yukon streams, Freshwater Biology, 39, 765-774.10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00317.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Bonada N., Prat N., Resh V. H. and Statzner B., 2006 ‒ Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches, Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 495-523.10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124Search in Google Scholar

5. Bowman M. F. and Bailey R. C., 1997 ‒ Does taxonomic resolution affect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate communities? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54, 1802-1807.10.1139/f97-085Search in Google Scholar

6. Connell J. H., 1978 ‒ Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs, Science, 199, 1302-1310.10.1126/science.199.4335.1302Search in Google Scholar

7. Culp J. M. and Davies R. W., 1983 ‒ An assessment of the effect of stream bank clear cutting on macroinvertebrate communities in a managed watershed, Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1208.Search in Google Scholar

8. Danielopol D. L., 1989 ‒ Groundwater fauna associated with riverine aquifers, Journal of Northern American Benthological Society, 8, 18-35.10.2307/1467399Search in Google Scholar

9. De’ath G. 2002 ‒ Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for constrained classification analysis, Ecology, 83, 1103-1117.Search in Google Scholar

10. De’ath G. and Fabricius K. E., 2007 ‒ Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for the analysis of complex ecological data, Ecology, 81, 3178-3192.10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3178:CARTAP]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

11. Di Sabatino A., Gereke R., Gledhill T. and Smith H., 2010 ‒ Acari: Hydrachnidia II, in Gerecke R. (ed.), Chelicerata, Acari, II, Süsswasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, 7, 2-2, Elsevier Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, 1-234.10.1007/978-3-8274-2266-8_1Search in Google Scholar

12. Dole-Olivier M. J. 2011 ‒ The hyporheic refuge hypothesis reconsidered: a review of hydrological aspects, Marine and Freshwater Research, 62, 1281-1302.Search in Google Scholar

13. Dudgeon D. 1994 ‒ The functional significance of selection of particles by aquatic animals during building behaviour, in The biology of particles in aquatic systems, 2nd edition, Wotton R. S. (ed.), Lewis Publishers, London, UK, 289-312.Search in Google Scholar

14. Elliott J. M., 2008 ‒ The ecology of riffle beetles (Coleoptera: Elmidae), Freshwater Reviews, 1, 189-203.10.1608/FRJ-1.2.4Search in Google Scholar

15. Eriksen C. H., 1966 ‒ Ecological significance of respiration and substrate for burrowing Ephemeroptera, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 46, 93-103.10.1139/z68-015Search in Google Scholar

16. Extence C. A., Balbi D. M. and Chadd R. P., 1999 ‒ River flow indexing using British benthic macroinvertebrates: a framework for setting hydroecological objectives, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 15, 543-574.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199911/12)15:6<545::AID-RRR561>3.0.CO;2-WSearch in Google Scholar

17. Jones J. I., Murphy J. F., Collins A., Sear D. A., Naden P. S. and Armitage P. D., 2012 ‒ The impact of fine sediments on macroinvertebrates, River Research and Applications, 28, 1055-1071.10.1002/rra.1516Search in Google Scholar

18. Kappes H. and Haase P., 2012 ‒ Slow, but steady: dispersal of freshwater molluscs, Aquatic Sciences, 74.1, 1-14.10.1007/s00027-011-0187-6Search in Google Scholar

19. Kass G. V. 1980 ‒ An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data, Journal of Applied Statistics, 29, 119-127.Search in Google Scholar

20. Kley A., Kinzler W., Schank Y., Mayer G., Waloszek D. and Maier G., 2009 ‒ Influence of substrate preference and complexity on co-existence of two non-native gammarideans (Crustacea: Amphipoda), Aquatic Ecology, 43, 1047-1059.10.1007/s10452-009-9242-ySearch in Google Scholar

21. Lake P. S., Palmer M. A., Biro P., Cole J., Covich A. P., Dahm C., Gibert J., Goedkoop W., Martens K. and Verhoeven J., 2000 ‒ Global change and the biodiversity of freshwater ecosystems: impacts on linkages between above-sediment and sediment biota: all forms of anthropogenic disturbance changes in land use, biogeochemical processes, or biotic addition or loss not only damage the biota of freshwater sediments but also disrupt the linkages between above-sediment and sediment-dwelling biota, BioScience, 50, 12, 1099-1107.10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[1099:GCATBO]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

22. Lancaster J. and Belyea L. R., 2006 ‒ Defining the limits to local density: alternative views of abundance-environment relationships, Freshwater Biology, 51, 783-796.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01518.xSearch in Google Scholar

23. Lemly A. D. 1982 ‒ Modification of benthic insect communities in polluted streams: combined effects of sedimentation and nutrient enrichment, Hydrobiologia, 87, 229-245.10.1007/BF00007232Search in Google Scholar

24. Lenat D. R. and Resh V. H., 2001 ‒ Taxonomy and stream ecology – the benefits of genus- and species-level identifications, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 20, 287-298.10.2307/1468323Search in Google Scholar

25. Marić S., Stanković D., Wazenbök J., Šanda R., Erös T., Takács A., Specziár A., Sekulić A., Sekulić N., Bănăduc D., Ćaleta M., Trombitsky I., Galambos L., Sipos S. and Snoj A., 2017 ‒ Phylogeography and population genetics of the European mudminnow (Umbra krameri) with a time-calibrated phylogeny for the family Umbridae, Hydrobiologia, 792, 1, 151-168, DOI 10.1007/s10750-016-3051-9, ISSN 0018-8158, Eissn 1573-5117.10.1007/s10750-016-3051-9,ISSN0018-8158,Eissn1573-5117Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Merritt R. W. and Cummins K. W. (eds) 1996 ‒ An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, insects of North America 3rd edition, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque. Iowa, USA, 862.Search in Google Scholar

27. Milner A. M., Robertson A. L., McDermott M. J., Klaar M. J. and Brown L. E., 2013 ‒ Major flood disturbance alters river ecosystem evolution, Nature Climate Change, 3, 137-141.10.1038/nclimate1665Search in Google Scholar

28. Moldovan O. T., Melegi I., Levei E. and Terente M., 2013 ‒ A simple method for assessing biotic indicators and predicting biodiversity in the hyporheic zone of a river polluted with metals, Ecological Indicators, 24, 412-420.10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.019Search in Google Scholar

29. Nebeker A. V., 1972 ‒ The effect of low oxygen concentration on survival and emergence of aquatic insects, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 101, 675-679.10.1577/1548-8659(1972)101<675:EOLOCO>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

30. Pacioglu O., Shaw P. and Robertson A., 2012 ‒ Patch scale response of hyporheic invertebrates to fine sediment removal in two chalk rivers, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 4, 283-288.10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0388Search in Google Scholar

31. Pacioglu O., Moldovan O. T., Shaw P. and Robertson A., 2016 ‒ Response of invertebrates from the hyporheic zone of chalk rivers to eutrophication and land use, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 4729-4740.10.1007/s11356-015-5703-0Search in Google Scholar

32. Palmer M. A., Arensburger P., Martin A. P. and Denman D. W., 1996 ‒ Disturbance and patch-specific responses: the interactive effects of woody debris and floods on lotic invertebrates, Oecologia, 105, 247-257.10.1007/BF00328554Search in Google Scholar

33. Pârvulescu L. and Hamchevici C., 2010 ‒ The relation between water quality and the distribution of Gammarus balcanicus Schaferna 1922 (Amphipoda: Gammaridae) in the Anina Mountains, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 5, 161-168.Search in Google Scholar

34. Pârvulescu L., Zaharia C., Groza M., Csillik O., Satmari A. and Drăguţ L., 2016 ‒ Flash-flood potential: a proxy for crayfish habitat stability, Ecohydrology, 9, 1507-1516.10.1002/eco.1744Search in Google Scholar

35. Pennak R. W. 1989 ‒ Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 268.Search in Google Scholar

36. Pîrvu M. and Pacioglu O., 2012 ‒ The ecological requirements of caddisflies larvae (Insecta: Trichoptera) and their usefulness in water quality assessment of a river in south-west Romania, Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 407, 03.10.1051/kmae/2012029Search in Google Scholar

37. Reice S. R., Wissmar R. C. and Naiman R. J., 1990 ‒ Disturbance regimes, resilience, and recovery of animal communities and habitats in lotic ecosystems, Environmental Management, 14, 647-659.10.1007/BF02394715Search in Google Scholar

38. Relyea C., Minshall D., Wayne G. and Danehy R. J., 2012 ‒ Development and validation of an aquatic fine sediment biotic index, Environmental Management, 49, 242-252.10.1007/s00267-011-9784-3Search in Google Scholar

39. Resh V. H., Brown A. V., Covich A. P., Gurtz M. E., Li H. W., Minshall W. G., Reice S. R., Sheldon A L., Wallace J. B. and Wissmar R. C., 1988 – The role of disturbance in stream ecology, Freshwater Science, 7, 4, 433-455.10.2307/1467300Search in Google Scholar

40. Rundle S. D. 1990 ‒ Micro-arthropod seasonality in streams of varying pH, Freshwater Biology, 24, 411-431.Search in Google Scholar

41. Schmidt-Kloiber A. and Nijboer R. C., 2004 ‒ The effects of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes, Hydrobiologia, 516, 269-283.10.1007/978-94-007-0993-5_16Search in Google Scholar

42. Staicu G., Bănăduc D. and Găldean N., 1998 ‒ The structure of some benthic macroinvertebrates and fishes communities in the Vişeu Watershed, Maramureş, Romania, Travaux du Museum National d Histoire naturelle Grigore Antipa, Bucureşti, 587-608, XL.Search in Google Scholar

43. Statzner B. and Beche L. A., 2010 ‒ Can biological invertebrate traits resolve effects of multiple stressors on running water ecosystems? Freshwater Biology, 55, 80-119.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02369.xSearch in Google Scholar

44. Storey A. W., Edward D. H. D. and Gazei P., 1991 ‒ Surber and kick sampling: a comparison for the assessment of macroinvertebrate community structure in streams of south-western Australia, Hydrobiologia, 211, 111-121.10.1007/BF00037367Search in Google Scholar

45. Tronstad L. M., Tronstad R. P. and Benke A. C., 2007 ‒ Aerial colonization and growth: rapid invertebrate responses to temporary aquatic habitats in a river floodplain, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 26, 460-471.10.1899/06-057.1Search in Google Scholar

46. Townsend C. R. and Hildrew A. G., 1994 ‒ Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems, Freshwater Biology, 31, 265-275.10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01740.xSearch in Google Scholar

47. Vaughn C. C., 2012 ‒ Life history traits and abundance can predict local colonisation and extinction rates of freshwater mussels, Freshwater Biology, 57, 982-992.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02759.xSearch in Google Scholar

48. Wallace J. B. 1990 ‒ Recovery of lotic macroinvertebrate communities from disturbance, Environmental Management, 14, 605-620.Search in Google Scholar

49. Warwick R. M. 1988 ‒ The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 19, 259-268.Search in Google Scholar

50. Weigel B. M., Wang L., Rasmussen P. W., Butcher J. T., Stewart P. M., Simon P. and Wiley M. J., 2003 ‒ Relative influence of variables at multiple spatial scales on stream macroinvertebrates in the Northern Lakes and Forest ecoregion, USA, Freshwater Biology, 48, 1440-1461.10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01076.xSearch in Google Scholar

51. Wiley M. J. and Kohler S. L., 1980 ‒ Position changes of mayfly nymphs due to behavioural regulation of oxygen consumption, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 58, 618-622.10.1139/z80-088Search in Google Scholar

52. Williams D. D., Taveres A. F. and Bryant E., 1987 ‒ Respiratory device or camouflage? A case for the caddisfly, Oikos, 50, 42-52.10.2307/3565400Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2344-3219
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, Ecology