[1. Anastasiu P., Preda C., Bănăduc D. and Cogălniceanu D., 2017 ‒ Alien species of European Union concern in Romania, Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 19.3, The Wetlands Diversity, ISSN-L 1841-7051, ISSN 2344-3219, 93-106.10.1515/trser-2017-0024]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Armitage P. D., 1995 ‒ Faunal community change in response to flow manipulation, in The ecological basis for river management, Harper D. M. and Ferguson A. J. D. (eds), Wiley, Chichester, UK, 59-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bailey R. C., Kennedy M. G., Dervish M. Z. and Taylor R. M., 1998 ‒ Biological assessment of freshwater ecosystems using a reference approach: comparing predicted and actual benthic invertebrate communities in Yukon streams, Freshwater Biology, 39, 765-774.10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00317.x]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bonada N., Prat N., Resh V. H. and Statzner B., 2006 ‒ Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches, Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 495-523.10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151124]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bowman M. F. and Bailey R. C., 1997 ‒ Does taxonomic resolution affect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate communities? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54, 1802-1807.10.1139/f97-085]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Connell J. H., 1978 ‒ Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs, Science, 199, 1302-1310.10.1126/science.199.4335.1302]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Culp J. M. and Davies R. W., 1983 ‒ An assessment of the effect of stream bank clear cutting on macroinvertebrate communities in a managed watershed, Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1208.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Danielopol D. L., 1989 ‒ Groundwater fauna associated with riverine aquifers, Journal of Northern American Benthological Society, 8, 18-35.10.2307/1467399]Search in Google Scholar
[9. De’ath G. 2002 ‒ Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for constrained classification analysis, Ecology, 83, 1103-1117.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. De’ath G. and Fabricius K. E., 2007 ‒ Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for the analysis of complex ecological data, Ecology, 81, 3178-3192.10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3178:CARTAP]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Di Sabatino A., Gereke R., Gledhill T. and Smith H., 2010 ‒ Acari: Hydrachnidia II, in Gerecke R. (ed.), Chelicerata, Acari, II, Süsswasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, 7, 2-2, Elsevier Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, 1-234.10.1007/978-3-8274-2266-8_1]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Dole-Olivier M. J. 2011 ‒ The hyporheic refuge hypothesis reconsidered: a review of hydrological aspects, Marine and Freshwater Research, 62, 1281-1302.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Dudgeon D. 1994 ‒ The functional significance of selection of particles by aquatic animals during building behaviour, in The biology of particles in aquatic systems, 2nd edition, Wotton R. S. (ed.), Lewis Publishers, London, UK, 289-312.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Elliott J. M., 2008 ‒ The ecology of riffle beetles (Coleoptera: Elmidae), Freshwater Reviews, 1, 189-203.10.1608/FRJ-1.2.4]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Eriksen C. H., 1966 ‒ Ecological significance of respiration and substrate for burrowing Ephemeroptera, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 46, 93-103.10.1139/z68-015]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Extence C. A., Balbi D. M. and Chadd R. P., 1999 ‒ River flow indexing using British benthic macroinvertebrates: a framework for setting hydroecological objectives, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 15, 543-574.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199911/12)15:6<545::AID-RRR561>3.0.CO;2-W]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Jones J. I., Murphy J. F., Collins A., Sear D. A., Naden P. S. and Armitage P. D., 2012 ‒ The impact of fine sediments on macroinvertebrates, River Research and Applications, 28, 1055-1071.10.1002/rra.1516]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kappes H. and Haase P., 2012 ‒ Slow, but steady: dispersal of freshwater molluscs, Aquatic Sciences, 74.1, 1-14.10.1007/s00027-011-0187-6]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kass G. V. 1980 ‒ An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data, Journal of Applied Statistics, 29, 119-127.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kley A., Kinzler W., Schank Y., Mayer G., Waloszek D. and Maier G., 2009 ‒ Influence of substrate preference and complexity on co-existence of two non-native gammarideans (Crustacea: Amphipoda), Aquatic Ecology, 43, 1047-1059.10.1007/s10452-009-9242-y]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Lake P. S., Palmer M. A., Biro P., Cole J., Covich A. P., Dahm C., Gibert J., Goedkoop W., Martens K. and Verhoeven J., 2000 ‒ Global change and the biodiversity of freshwater ecosystems: impacts on linkages between above-sediment and sediment biota: all forms of anthropogenic disturbance changes in land use, biogeochemical processes, or biotic addition or loss not only damage the biota of freshwater sediments but also disrupt the linkages between above-sediment and sediment-dwelling biota, BioScience, 50, 12, 1099-1107.10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[1099:GCATBO]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lancaster J. and Belyea L. R., 2006 ‒ Defining the limits to local density: alternative views of abundance-environment relationships, Freshwater Biology, 51, 783-796.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01518.x]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Lemly A. D. 1982 ‒ Modification of benthic insect communities in polluted streams: combined effects of sedimentation and nutrient enrichment, Hydrobiologia, 87, 229-245.10.1007/BF00007232]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Lenat D. R. and Resh V. H., 2001 ‒ Taxonomy and stream ecology – the benefits of genus- and species-level identifications, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 20, 287-298.10.2307/1468323]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Marić S., Stanković D., Wazenbök J., Šanda R., Erös T., Takács A., Specziár A., Sekulić A., Sekulić N., Bănăduc D., Ćaleta M., Trombitsky I., Galambos L., Sipos S. and Snoj A., 2017 ‒ Phylogeography and population genetics of the European mudminnow (Umbra krameri) with a time-calibrated phylogeny for the family Umbridae, Hydrobiologia, 792, 1, 151-168, DOI 10.1007/s10750-016-3051-9, ISSN 0018-8158, Eissn 1573-5117.10.1007/s10750-016-3051-9,ISSN0018-8158,Eissn1573-5117]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Merritt R. W. and Cummins K. W. (eds) 1996 ‒ An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, insects of North America 3rd edition, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque. Iowa, USA, 862.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Milner A. M., Robertson A. L., McDermott M. J., Klaar M. J. and Brown L. E., 2013 ‒ Major flood disturbance alters river ecosystem evolution, Nature Climate Change, 3, 137-141.10.1038/nclimate1665]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Moldovan O. T., Melegi I., Levei E. and Terente M., 2013 ‒ A simple method for assessing biotic indicators and predicting biodiversity in the hyporheic zone of a river polluted with metals, Ecological Indicators, 24, 412-420.10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.019]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Nebeker A. V., 1972 ‒ The effect of low oxygen concentration on survival and emergence of aquatic insects, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 101, 675-679.10.1577/1548-8659(1972)101<675:EOLOCO>2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Pacioglu O., Shaw P. and Robertson A., 2012 ‒ Patch scale response of hyporheic invertebrates to fine sediment removal in two chalk rivers, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 4, 283-288.10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0388]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Pacioglu O., Moldovan O. T., Shaw P. and Robertson A., 2016 ‒ Response of invertebrates from the hyporheic zone of chalk rivers to eutrophication and land use, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 4729-4740.10.1007/s11356-015-5703-0]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Palmer M. A., Arensburger P., Martin A. P. and Denman D. W., 1996 ‒ Disturbance and patch-specific responses: the interactive effects of woody debris and floods on lotic invertebrates, Oecologia, 105, 247-257.10.1007/BF00328554]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Pârvulescu L. and Hamchevici C., 2010 ‒ The relation between water quality and the distribution of Gammarus balcanicus Schaferna 1922 (Amphipoda: Gammaridae) in the Anina Mountains, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 5, 161-168.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Pârvulescu L., Zaharia C., Groza M., Csillik O., Satmari A. and Drăguţ L., 2016 ‒ Flash-flood potential: a proxy for crayfish habitat stability, Ecohydrology, 9, 1507-1516.10.1002/eco.1744]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Pennak R. W. 1989 ‒ Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 268.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Pîrvu M. and Pacioglu O., 2012 ‒ The ecological requirements of caddisflies larvae (Insecta: Trichoptera) and their usefulness in water quality assessment of a river in south-west Romania, Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 407, 03.10.1051/kmae/2012029]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Reice S. R., Wissmar R. C. and Naiman R. J., 1990 ‒ Disturbance regimes, resilience, and recovery of animal communities and habitats in lotic ecosystems, Environmental Management, 14, 647-659.10.1007/BF02394715]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Relyea C., Minshall D., Wayne G. and Danehy R. J., 2012 ‒ Development and validation of an aquatic fine sediment biotic index, Environmental Management, 49, 242-252.10.1007/s00267-011-9784-3]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Resh V. H., Brown A. V., Covich A. P., Gurtz M. E., Li H. W., Minshall W. G., Reice S. R., Sheldon A L., Wallace J. B. and Wissmar R. C., 1988 – The role of disturbance in stream ecology, Freshwater Science, 7, 4, 433-455.10.2307/1467300]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Rundle S. D. 1990 ‒ Micro-arthropod seasonality in streams of varying pH, Freshwater Biology, 24, 411-431.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Schmidt-Kloiber A. and Nijboer R. C., 2004 ‒ The effects of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes, Hydrobiologia, 516, 269-283.10.1007/978-94-007-0993-5_16]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Staicu G., Bănăduc D. and Găldean N., 1998 ‒ The structure of some benthic macroinvertebrates and fishes communities in the Vişeu Watershed, Maramureş, Romania, Travaux du Museum National d Histoire naturelle Grigore Antipa, Bucureşti, 587-608, XL.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Statzner B. and Beche L. A., 2010 ‒ Can biological invertebrate traits resolve effects of multiple stressors on running water ecosystems? Freshwater Biology, 55, 80-119.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02369.x]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Storey A. W., Edward D. H. D. and Gazei P., 1991 ‒ Surber and kick sampling: a comparison for the assessment of macroinvertebrate community structure in streams of south-western Australia, Hydrobiologia, 211, 111-121.10.1007/BF00037367]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Tronstad L. M., Tronstad R. P. and Benke A. C., 2007 ‒ Aerial colonization and growth: rapid invertebrate responses to temporary aquatic habitats in a river floodplain, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 26, 460-471.10.1899/06-057.1]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Townsend C. R. and Hildrew A. G., 1994 ‒ Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems, Freshwater Biology, 31, 265-275.10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01740.x]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Vaughn C. C., 2012 ‒ Life history traits and abundance can predict local colonisation and extinction rates of freshwater mussels, Freshwater Biology, 57, 982-992.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02759.x]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Wallace J. B. 1990 ‒ Recovery of lotic macroinvertebrate communities from disturbance, Environmental Management, 14, 605-620.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Warwick R. M. 1988 ‒ The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 19, 259-268.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Weigel B. M., Wang L., Rasmussen P. W., Butcher J. T., Stewart P. M., Simon P. and Wiley M. J., 2003 ‒ Relative influence of variables at multiple spatial scales on stream macroinvertebrates in the Northern Lakes and Forest ecoregion, USA, Freshwater Biology, 48, 1440-1461.10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01076.x]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Wiley M. J. and Kohler S. L., 1980 ‒ Position changes of mayfly nymphs due to behavioural regulation of oxygen consumption, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 58, 618-622.10.1139/z80-088]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Williams D. D., Taveres A. F. and Bryant E., 1987 ‒ Respiratory device or camouflage? A case for the caddisfly, Oikos, 50, 42-52.10.2307/3565400]Search in Google Scholar