[1. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 2005; 36(3): S20-7.10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Poirier, J., Ribadeau Dumas, J.L., Catala, M., et al. Histologie: les tissus. (2002). Médecine 1ere année. 2eme éd. Paris: Masson,2002]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Donati D, Zolezzi C, Tomba P, Viganò A. Bone grafting: historical and conceptual review, starting with an old manuscript by Vittorio Putti. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78(1): 19-25.10.1080/17453670610013376]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, Wagner Q, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, et al. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng. 2018; 9: 2041731418776819.10.1177/2041731418776819]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Dressman H. Ueber Knochenplombierung bei Hohlenformigen Defekten des Knochens. Beitr Klin Chir 1892. 9, 804-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Martin E. Zur AiisfuIIune von Knochenhohlen mit todtem Material. Zentralbl. Cbir. 1894; 2 I : I 93 200.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. McGovern JA, Griffin M, Hutmacher DW. Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease. Dis Model Mech 2018; 11(4): dmm033084.10.1242/dmm.033084]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Gabriele Sommer, N., Hahn, D., Okutan, B., Marek, R., & Weinberg, A.-M. (2020). Animal Models in Orthopedic Research: The Proper Animal Model to Answer Fundamental Questions on Bone Healing Depending on Pathology and Implant Material (1st. ed.). Animal Models in Medicine and Biology. Eva Tvrdá and Sarat Chandra Yenisetti, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.89137]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Li Y, Chen SK, Li L, Qin L, Wang XL, Lai YX. Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials. J Orthop Translat 2015; 3(3): 95-104.10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Clements JR, Carpenter BB, Pourciau JK. Treating segmental bone defects: a new technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 2008; 47(4): 350-6.10.1053/j.jfas.2008.04.006]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 2005; 36(3): S20-7.10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Gilbert SF. (2000). Developmental Biology. 6th edition. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9983/.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Saima S, Jan SM, Shah AF, Yousuf A, Batra M. Bone grafts and bone substitutes in dentistry. J Oral Res Rev 2016; 8(1): 36-8.10.4103/2249-4987.182488]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Cypher TJ, Grossman JP. Biological principles of bone graft healing. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996; 35(5): 413-7.10.1016/S1067-2516(96)80061-5]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Wypych G. (2018) Functional fillers – Chemical Composition, Morphology, Performance, Applications (1st. ed.). Functional Fillers. ChemTec Publishing, 153-79.10.1016/B978-1-927885-37-6.50008-4]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 2001; 10(2): S96-101.10.1007/s005860100282]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Hudecki A, Kiryczyński G, Łos MJ. Biomaterials, Definition, Overview. Stem Cells and Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine 2019; 85–98.10.1016/B978-0-12-812258-7.00007-1]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Liu X, Ma PX. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 2004; 32(3): 477-86.10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Schallhorn RG. Present status of osseous grafting procedures. J Periodontol 1977; 48(9): 570-6.10.1902/jop.1977.48.9.570]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kumar P, Vinitha B, Fathima G. Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5(1): S125-7.10.4103/0975-7406.113312]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 371: 10-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Dodd CA, Fergusson CM, Freedman L, Houghton GR, Thomas D. Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70(3): 431-4.10.1302/0301-620X.70B3.3286656]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Summers BN, Eisenstein SM. Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71(4): 677-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Friedlaender GE, Strong DM, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Long-term follow-up of patients with osteochondral allografts. A correlation between immunologic responses and clinical outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30(4): 583-8.10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70111-5]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Damien CJ, Parsons JR. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes: a review of current technology and applications. J Appl Biomater 1991; 2(3): 187-208.10.1002/jab.77002030710149083]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Goldberg, V.M., Stevenson, S. & Shaffer, J.W. Biology of autografts and allografts. In: Friedlander GE, Goldberg VM, editors. Bone and cartilage allografts: biology and clinical applications. Park Ridge, Illinois: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1991: 3—11.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Hubbell JA. Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Biotechnology (N Y). 1995; 13(6): 565-76.10.1038/nbt0695-5659634795]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Campana V, Milano G, Pagano E, Barba M, Cicione C, Salonna G, et al. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2014; 25(10): 2445-61.10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Albanese A, Licata ME, Polizzi B, Campisi G. Plateletrich plasma (PRP) in dental and oral surgery: from the wound healing to bone regeneration. Immun Ageing 2013; 10(1): 23.10.1186/1742-4933-10-23]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Chai F, Raoul G, Wiss A, Ferri J, Hildebrand HF. Bone substitutes: Classification and concerns. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2011; 112(4): 212-21.10.1016/j.stomax.2011.06.003]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Liodaki E, Kraemer R, Mailaender P, Stang F. The Use of Bone Graft Substitute in Hand Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(24): e3631.10.1097/MD.0000000000003631]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Bohner M. Calcium orthophosphates in medicine: from ceramics to calcium phosphate cements. Injury 2000; 31(4): 37-47.10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80022-4]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Wendler A, Wehling M. The translatability of animal models for clinical development: biomarkers and disease models. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2010; 10(5): 601-6.10.1016/j.coph.2010.05.00920542730]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Gomes PS, Fernandes MH. Rodent models in bone-related research: the relevance of calvarial defects in the assessment of bone regeneration strategies. Lab Anim 2011; 45(1): 14-24.10.1258/la.2010.01008521156759]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Hambright WS, Niedernhofer LJ, Huard J, Robbins PD. Murine models of accelerated aging and musculoskeletal disease. Bone 2019; 125: 122-7.10.1016/j.bone.2019.03.00230844492]Search in Google Scholar
[36. An, Y.H. & Freidman, R.J. (1998). Animal models in orthopedic research (1st ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 1998. pp. 39-57. 622 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (205): 299-308.10.1097/00003086-198604000-00036]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 2007; 13: 1-10.10.22203/eCM.v013a0117334975]Search in Google Scholar
[39. An, Y.H. & Freidman, R.J. (1998). Animal Selections in Orthopaedic Research (1st ed.). Florida, US: CRC Press 1998; pp. 126-164. 622 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Newman E, Turner AS, Wark JD. The potential of sheep for the study of osteopenia: current status and comparison with other animal models. Bone 1995; 16(4): 277S-284S.10.1016/8756-3282(95)00026-A]Search in Google Scholar
[41. V DK Development of bone G. Sumner-Smith (Ed.), Bone in clinical orthopedics, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia (2006), pp. 1-80]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Pastoureau P, Arlot M, Caulin F, Barlet J, Meunier P, Delmas P. Effects of oophorectomy on biochemical and histological indices of bone turnover in ewes. J Bone Miner Res 1989; 4(1): 58.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Maissen O, Eckhardt C, Gogolewski S, Glatt M, Arvinte T, Steiner A, Rahn B, Schlegel U. Mechanical and radiological assessment of the influence of rhTGFbeta-3 on bone regeneration in a segmental defect in the ovine tibia: pilot study. J Orthop Res 2006; 24(8): 1670-8.10.1002/jor.2023116795047]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Reichert JC, Epari DR, Wullschleger ME, Saifzadeh S, Steck R, Lienau J, Sommerville S, Dickinson IC, Schütz MA, Duda GN, Hutmacher DW. Establishment of a preclinical ovine model for tibial segmental bone defect repair by applying bone tissue engineering strategies. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010; 16(1): 93-104.10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0455]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S, Kessler P, Wiltfang J, Schlegel KA. Bone regeneration in osseous defects using a resorbable nanoparticular hydroxyapatite. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(11): 1626-33.10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.01016243180]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J. Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 1998; 139(2): 663-70.10.1210/endo.139.2.57519449639]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Mosekilde L, Kragstrup J, Richards A. Compressive strength, ash weight, and volume of vertebral trabecular bone in experimental fluorosis in pigs. Calcif Tissue Int 1987; 40(6): 318-22.10.1007/BF025566933111670]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Pecquet Goad ME, Goad DL. Biomedical Material and Devices. Haschek and Rousseaux’s Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology 2013; 2: 783-806.10.1016/B978-0-12-415759-0.00026-1]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Thrivikraman G, Madras G, Basu B. In vitro/In vivo assessment and mechanisms of toxicity of bioceramic materials and its wear particulates. RSC Adv 2014; 4(25): 12763.10.1039/c3ra44483j]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Liu LP, Xiao YB, Xiao ZW, Wang ZB, Li C, Gong X. Toxicity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on rabbits. Journal of hygiene research 2005; 34(4): 474-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Ooi JP, Kasim SR, Shaari RB, Saidin NA. In vivo efficacy and toxicity of synthesized nano-β-tricalcium phosphate in a rabbit tibial defect model. Toxicol Res Appl 2018; 2: 1–9.10.1177/2397847318819499]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Arsenijevic N, Selakovic D, Katanic Stankovic JS, Mihailovic V, Mit52.rovic S, Milenkovic J, et al. The Beneficial Role of Filipendula ulmaria Extract in Prevention of Prodepressant Effect and Cognitive Impairment Induced by Nanoparticles of Calcium Phosphates in Rats. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2021; 2021: 6670135.10.1155/2021/6670135789559233628375]Search in Google Scholar