Distribution in SAR palaeodoses due to spatial heterogeniety of natural beta dose

[1] Arnold LJ and Roberts RG, 2009. Stochastic modelling of multi-grain equivalent dose (D e) distributions: Implications for OSL dating of sediment mixtures Quaternary Geochronology 4(3): 204–230, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2008.12.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2008.12.00110.1016/j.quageo.2008.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bailey R, 2002. Simulations of variability in the luminescence characteristics of natural quartz and its implications for estimates of absorbed dose Radiation Protection Dosimetry 100(1–4): 33–38. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a005881Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bevington PR and Robinson DK, 2003. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. Mcgraw-Hill, New York, 3rd: 336 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Duller GAT, Bøtter-Jensen L and Murray AS, 2000. Optical dating of single sand-sized grains of quartz: Sources of variability Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 453–457, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-X10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-XSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Galbraith RF, 1988. Graphical display of estimates having differing standard errors Technometrics 30(3): 271–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/127008110.1080/00401706.1988.10488400Search in Google Scholar

[6] Galbraith RF, 1990. Radial plots: Graphical assessment of spread in ages Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 17(3): 207–214, DOI 10.1016/1359-0189(90)90036-W. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1359-0189(90)90036-W10.1016/1359-0189(90)90036-WSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Huntley DJ and Baril MR, 1997. The K content of K-feldspars being measured in optical dating or in thermoluminescence dating. Ancient TL 15(1): 11. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Juyal N, Chamyal LS, Bhandari S, Bhushan R and Singhvi AK, 2006. Continental record of the southwest monsoon during the last 130 ka: Evidence from the southern margin of the Thar desert, India Quaternary Science Reviews 25(19–20): 2632–2650, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.02010.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.020Search in Google Scholar

[9] Mayya YS, Morthekai P, Murari MK and Singhvi AK, 2006. Towards quantifying beta microdosimetric effects in single-grain quartz dose distribution Radiation Measurements 41(7–8): 1032–1039, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.08.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.08.00410.1016/j.radmeas.2006.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[10] McFee CJ and Tite MS, 1998. Luminescence dating of sediments-the detection of high equivalent dose grains using an imaging photon detector Archaeometry 40(1): 153–168, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1998.tb00830.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1998.tb00830.x10.1111/j.1475-4754.1998.tb00830.xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Morthekai P, 2007. Investigations on radiation dose distribution in natural environment and their implications in luminescence chronology. Unpublished Thesis, Gujarat University. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Murray AS and Roberts RG, 1997. Determining the burial time of single grains of quartz using optically stimulated luminescence Earth and Planetary Science Letters 152(1–4): 163–180, DOI 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-710.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57–73, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-XSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Roberts R, Bird M, Olley J, Galbraith R, Lawson E, Laslett G, Yoshida H, Jones R, Fullagar R, Jacobsen G and Hua Q, 1998. Optical and radiocarbon dating at jinmium rock shelter in northern Australia. Nature 393(6683): 358–362, DOI 10.1038/30718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/3071810.1038/30718Search in Google Scholar

[15] Singhvi AK, Stokes S, Chauhan N, Nagar YC and Jaiswal M, 2011. Changes in natural OSL sensitivity during single aliquot regeneration procedure and their implications for equivalent dose determination Geochronometria 38(3): 231–241, DOI 10.2478/s13386-011-0028-3. 10.2478/s13386-011-0028-3Search in Google Scholar