This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions the European Green Deal. Brussels: EC, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions. Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future. Brussels: EC, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Rozmarynowska M., Oldakowski B. Development perspectives for small and medium Baltic Sea ports. Diepoldsau: TransBaltic, Baltic Ports Organization, 2013Search in Google Scholar
Karimah I. D., Yudhistira M. H. Does small-scale port investment affect local economic activity? Evidence from small-port development in Indonesia. Economics of Transportation 2020:23:100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2020.100180Search in Google Scholar
Mańkowska M., Kotowska I., Pluciński M. Seaports as nodal points of circular supply chains: Opportunities and challenges for secondary ports. Sustainability 2020:12(9):3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093926Search in Google Scholar
Bjerkan K. Y., Seter H. Reviewing tools and technologies for sustainable ports: Does research enable decision making in ports? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2019:72:243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.05.003.Search in Google Scholar
Danelec Marine. White Paper on Servitization in the Maritime Industry. Birkeroed: Danelec Marine A/S, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Matzen D., McAloone T. C. From product to service orientation in the maritime equipment industry-a case study. Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier 2008:515–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_106Search in Google Scholar
Gerlitz L., Meyer C. Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe's Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021:13(8):4386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084386Search in Google Scholar
Kolagar M., Parida V., Sjödin D. Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research 2022:146:176–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.067Search in Google Scholar
PAC2. A cluster initiative: Small and Medium Sized Ports as Hubs for Smart Growth and Sustainable Connectivity. 2 Seas Magazine – Special Focus 2014:6–15.Search in Google Scholar
Feng L., Notteboom T. Peripheral challenge by small and medium sized ports (SMPs) in multi-port gateway regions: the case study of northeast of China. Polish Maritime Research 2013:20:55–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2013-0027Search in Google Scholar
Notteboom T. E. The peripheral port challenge in container port systems. International maritime transport: perspectives. Chapter 13. Oxfordshire, Routledge, 2005:173–188.Search in Google Scholar
Robinson R. Asian hub/feeder nets: the dynamics of restructuring. Maritime Policy & Management 1998:25(1):21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839800000043Search in Google Scholar
Lu W., et al. Network connection strategy for Small and Medium-sized Ports (SMPs). The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 2018:34(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.03.003Search in Google Scholar
Unctad. 2014. Review of Maritime Transport 2014. New York, Geneva: UN, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Notteboom T. E., Haralambides H. E. Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis? Maritime Economics & Logistics 2020:22:329–352. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00162-7Search in Google Scholar
Hayek F.A. Competition as a Discovery Procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2002:5(3)9–23.Search in Google Scholar
Foray D. Smart Specialisation: The Concept. Presented at the Smart Specialisation Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 1984:13(6):343–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0Search in Google Scholar
Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Asheim B., Gertler M. The geography of innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. Chapter 13. The Oxford handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005:291–317.Search in Google Scholar
Malerba, F. Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies 2005:14(1–2):63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688Search in Google Scholar
Smith K. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 2000:1(1):73–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/146324400363536Search in Google Scholar
Tödtling F., Lehner P., Trippl M. Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies 2006:14(8):1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600852365Search in Google Scholar
Gertler M. S., Levitte Y. M. Local nodes in global networks: the geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation 2005:12(4):487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500361981Search in Google Scholar
Boschma R. A., Ter Wal A. L. J. Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the South of Italy. Industry and Innovation 2007:14(2):177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701253441Search in Google Scholar
Courchene T. J. Glocalisation: the regional/international interface. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 1995:18(1):1–20.Search in Google Scholar
Porter M. Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Networks in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly 2000:14(1):15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105Search in Google Scholar
Wolfe D. Social Capital and Cluster Development in Learning Regions. Knowledge, Clusters and Regional Innovation: Economic Development in Canada, Montreal and Kingston. London: Ithaca – School of Policy Studies, Queens University, 2002:11–38.Search in Google Scholar
Payne A. F., Storbacka K., Frow P. Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2008:36(1):83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0Search in Google Scholar
Frow et al. Managing co-creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management 2015:26(3):463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087Search in Google Scholar
Chan H. C. Internet of things business models. Journal of Service Science and Management 2015:8(04):552. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.84056Search in Google Scholar
Melão N. Servitization. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Quality and the Service Economy. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE Publications, 2015:737–739.Search in Google Scholar
Kowalkowski et al. Servitization and deservitization: Overview, concepts, and definitions. Industrial Marketing Management 2017:60:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.12.007Search in Google Scholar
Vendrell-Herrero et al. Servitization as a driver for organizational change. Strategic Change 2014:23(5–6):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1976Search in Google Scholar
Tronvoll B., et al. Transformational shifts through digital servitization. Industrial Marketing Management 2020:89:293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.005Search in Google Scholar
Agatić A., Kolanović I. Improving the seaport service quality by implementing digital technologies. Pomorstvo 2020:34(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.34.1.11Search in Google Scholar
Creswell J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Korstjens I., Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice 2017:23(1):274–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090.Search in Google Scholar
Shields P. M., Rangarajan N. A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. Stillwater, USA: New Forums Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Borrego M., Douglas E., Amelink C. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 2007:98:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.xSearch in Google Scholar
Merriam S. B., Tisdell E. J. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Yin R. K. Case Study Research and Applications. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Yazan B. Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report 2015:20:134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102Search in Google Scholar
Arbnor I., Bjerke B. Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Audretsch D. B., et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer 2019:44:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4Search in Google Scholar
Cantner U., et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic lifecycle model. Small Business Economics 2020:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00316-0Search in Google Scholar
Crotty M. The foundations of social science research: meaning and perspective in the research process. New South Wales: Allen and Uwin, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Lincoln Y. S., Lynham S. A., Guba E. G. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences revisited. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2011:97–128.Search in Google Scholar
King N., Horrocks C. Interviews in Qualitative Research. SAGE, 2011:6–24.Search in Google Scholar
Philipp R. Blockchain for LBG maritime energy contracting and value chain management: a green shipping business model for seaports. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):329–349. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0107Search in Google Scholar
Okada T., et al. Green port structures and their ecosystem services in highly urbanized Japanese bays. Coastal Engineering Journal 2021:63(3):310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2021.1911194Search in Google Scholar
Witte P., et al. Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography 2018:71:224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.03.006Search in Google Scholar
Meyer C., Gerlitz L., Henesey L. Cross-border capacity-building for port ecosystems in small and medium-sized Baltic ports. TalTech Journal of European Studies 2021:11(1):113–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0008Search in Google Scholar
Philipp R., Gerlitz L., Moldabekova A. Small and medium-sized seaports on the digital track: Tracing digitalisation across the South Baltic Region by innovative auditing procedures. Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication 2020:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44610-9_35Search in Google Scholar
Meyer C. Integration of Baltic small and medium-sized ports in regional innovation strategies on smart specialisation (RIS3). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2021:7(3):184. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030184Search in Google Scholar