Small and Medium-Sized Port Greening Initiatives as Trigger for a Servitisation Port Ecosystem

[1] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions the European Green Deal. Brussels: EC, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions. Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future. Brussels: EC, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rozmarynowska M., Oldakowski B. Development perspectives for small and medium Baltic Sea ports. Diepoldsau: TransBaltic, Baltic Ports Organization, 2013 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Karimah I. D., Yudhistira M. H. Does small-scale port investment affect local economic activity? Evidence from small-port development in Indonesia. Economics of Transportation 2020:23:100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2020.100180 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Mańkowska M., Kotowska I., Pluciński M. Seaports as nodal points of circular supply chains: Opportunities and challenges for secondary ports. Sustainability 2020:12(9):3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093926 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bjerkan K. Y., Seter H. Reviewing tools and technologies for sustainable ports: Does research enable decision making in ports? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2019:72:243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.05.003. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Danelec Marine. White Paper on Servitization in the Maritime Industry. Birkeroed: Danelec Marine A/S, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Matzen D., McAloone T. C. From product to service orientation in the maritime equipment industry-a case study. Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier 2008:515–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_106 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gerlitz L., Meyer C. Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe's Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021:13(8):4386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084386 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kolagar M., Parida V., Sjödin D. Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research 2022:146:176–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.067 Search in Google Scholar

[11] PAC2. A cluster initiative: Small and Medium Sized Ports as Hubs for Smart Growth and Sustainable Connectivity. 2 Seas Magazine – Special Focus 2014:6–15. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Feng L., Notteboom T. Peripheral challenge by small and medium sized ports (SMPs) in multi-port gateway regions: the case study of northeast of China. Polish Maritime Research 2013:20:55–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2013-0027 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Notteboom T. E. The peripheral port challenge in container port systems. International maritime transport: perspectives. Chapter 13. Oxfordshire, Routledge, 2005:173–188. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Robinson R. Asian hub/feeder nets: the dynamics of restructuring. Maritime Policy & Management 1998:25(1):21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839800000043 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lu W., et al. Network connection strategy for Small and Medium-sized Ports (SMPs). The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 2018:34(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.03.003 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Unctad. 2014. Review of Maritime Transport 2014. New York, Geneva: UN, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Notteboom T. E., Haralambides H. E. Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis? Maritime Economics & Logistics 2020:22:329–352. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00162-7 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hayek F.A. Competition as a Discovery Procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2002:5(3)9–23. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Foray D. Smart Specialisation: The Concept. Presented at the Smart Specialisation Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2012. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 1984:13(6):343–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Asheim B., Gertler M. The geography of innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. Chapter 13. The Oxford handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005:291–317. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Malerba, F. Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies 2005:14(1–2):63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Smith K. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 2000:1(1):73–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/146324400363536 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Tödtling F., Lehner P., Trippl M. Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies 2006:14(8):1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600852365 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gertler M. S., Levitte Y. M. Local nodes in global networks: the geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation 2005:12(4):487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500361981 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Boschma R. A., Ter Wal A. L. J. Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the South of Italy. Industry and Innovation 2007:14(2):177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701253441 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Courchene T. J. Glocalisation: the regional/international interface. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 1995:18(1):1–20. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Porter M. Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Networks in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly 2000:14(1):15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Wolfe D. Social Capital and Cluster Development in Learning Regions. Knowledge, Clusters and Regional Innovation: Economic Development in Canada, Montreal and Kingston. London: Ithaca – School of Policy Studies, Queens University, 2002:11–38. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Payne A. F., Storbacka K., Frow P. Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2008:36(1):83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Frow et al. Managing co-creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management 2015:26(3):463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Chan H. C. Internet of things business models. Journal of Service Science and Management 2015:8(04):552. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.84056 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Melão N. Servitization. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Quality and the Service Economy. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE Publications, 2015:737–739. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kowalkowski et al. Servitization and deservitization: Overview, concepts, and definitions. Industrial Marketing Management 2017:60:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.12.007 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Vendrell-Herrero et al. Servitization as a driver for organizational change. Strategic Change 2014:23(5–6):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1976 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Tronvoll B., et al. Transformational shifts through digital servitization. Industrial Marketing Management 2020:89:293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.005 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Agatić A., Kolanović I. Improving the seaport service quality by implementing digital technologies. Pomorstvo 2020:34(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.34.1.11 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Creswell J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Korstjens I., Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice 2017:23(1):274–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Shields P. M., Rangarajan N. A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. Stillwater, USA: New Forums Press, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Borrego M., Douglas E., Amelink C. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 2007:98:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x Search in Google Scholar

[43] Merriam S. B., Tisdell E. J. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Yin R. K. Case Study Research and Applications. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Yazan B. Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report 2015:20:134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Arbnor I., Bjerke B. Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Audretsch D. B., et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer 2019:44:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Cantner U., et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic lifecycle model. Small Business Economics 2020:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00316-0 Search in Google Scholar

[49] Crotty M. The foundations of social science research: meaning and perspective in the research process. New South Wales: Allen and Uwin, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[50] Lincoln Y. S., Lynham S. A., Guba E. G. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences revisited. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2011:97–128. Search in Google Scholar

[51] King N., Horrocks C. Interviews in Qualitative Research. SAGE, 2011:6–24. Search in Google Scholar

[52] Philipp R. Blockchain for LBG maritime energy contracting and value chain management: a green shipping business model for seaports. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):329–349. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0107 Search in Google Scholar

[53] Okada T., et al. Green port structures and their ecosystem services in highly urbanized Japanese bays. Coastal Engineering Journal 2021:63(3):310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2021.1911194 Search in Google Scholar

[54] Witte P., et al. Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography 2018:71:224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.03.006 Search in Google Scholar

[55] Meyer C., Gerlitz L., Henesey L. Cross-border capacity-building for port ecosystems in small and medium-sized Baltic ports. TalTech Journal of European Studies 2021:11(1):113–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0008 Search in Google Scholar

[56] Philipp R., Gerlitz L., Moldabekova A. Small and medium-sized seaports on the digital track: Tracing digitalisation across the South Baltic Region by innovative auditing procedures. Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication 2020:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44610-9_35 Search in Google Scholar

[57] Meyer C. Integration of Baltic small and medium-sized ports in regional innovation strategies on smart specialisation (RIS3). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2021:7(3):184. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030184 Search in Google Scholar