Evaluation of the effect of Intubation Box Use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision^® and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital

[1] Maniar A, Jagannathan B. (2020). The aerosol box. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 36, Suppl S1, 141–43. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_283_20 ManiarA JagannathanB 2020 The aerosol box J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 36 Suppl S1 141 43 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_283_20 757398833100666 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Begley L, Lavery KE, Nickson CP, Brewster DJ. (2020). The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study. Anaesthesia, 75, 1014–21. doi: 10.1111/anae.15115 BegleyL LaveryKE NicksonCP BrewsterDJ 2020 The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study Anaesthesia 75 1014 21 10.1111/anae.15115 727301732397008 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Sorbello M, Rosenblatt W, Hofmeyr R, Greif R, Urdaneta F. (2020). Aerosol boxes and barrier enclosures for airway management in COVID-19 patients: a scoping review and narrative synthesis. Br J Anaesth., 125(6), 880–94. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.038 SorbelloM RosenblattW HofmeyrR GreifR UrdanetaF 2020 Aerosol boxes and barrier enclosures for airway management in COVID-19 patients: a scoping review and narrative synthesis Br J Anaesth. 125 6 880 94 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.038 747071232977955 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Canelli R, Connor CW, Gonzalez M, Nozari A, Ortega R. (2020). Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med., 382, 1957–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007589 CanelliR ConnorCW GonzalezM NozariA OrtegaR 2020 Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation N Engl J Med. 382 1957 58 10.1056/NEJMc2007589 715133332243118 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. (1998). Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med., 5, 919–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x LevitanRM OchrochEA KushS ShoferFS HollanderJE 1998 Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale Acad Emerg Med. 5 919 23 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x 9754506 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Dwivedi D, Bhatia P, Aggarwal M, Sen S, Hooda B, Dudeja P. (2020). A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study. J Mar Med Soc, 22, Suppl S1, 88–92. doi: 10.4103/jmms.jmms_100_20 DwivediD BhatiaP AggarwalM SenS HoodaB DudejaP 2020 A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study J Mar Med Soc 22 Suppl S1 88 92 10.4103/jmms.jmms_100_20 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Kannaujia A, Haldar R, Shamim R, Mishra P, Agarwal A. (2021). Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID19 era: A manikin based pilot study. Saudi J Anaesth 2021;15:86–92. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_1062_20. KannaujiaA HaldarR ShamimR MishraP AgarwalA 2021 Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID19 era: A manikin based pilot study Saudi J Anaesth 2021 15 86 92 10.4103/sja.sja_1062_20 819126334188622 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Wakabayashi R, Ishida1 T, Yamada T, Kawamata M. (2020). Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty. Journal of Anesthesia, 34, 790–93. doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02835-2 WakabayashiR Ishida1T YamadaT KawamataM 2020 Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty Journal of Anesthesia 34 790 93 doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02835-2 10.1007/s00540-020-02835-2738741632728963 Search in Google Scholar

[9] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Protective Barrier Enclosures Without Negative Pressure Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic May Increase Risk to Patients and Health Care Providers-Letter to Health Care Providers. U.S. Food Drug Adminstration. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2020 Protective Barrier Enclosures Without Negative Pressure Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic May Increase Risk to Patients and Health Care Providers-Letter to Health Care Providers U.S. Food Drug Adminstration Search in Google Scholar

[10] Priyanka AS, Nag K, Hemanth Kumar V R, Singh DR, Kumar S, Sivashanmugam T. (2017). Comparison of King Vision^® and TRUVIEW laryngoscope for postextubation visualization of vocal cord mobility in patients undergoing thyroid and major neck surgeries: A randomized clinical trial. Anesth Essays Res, 11, 238–42. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.200240 PriyankaAS NagK Hemanth KumarV R SinghDR KumarS SivashanmugamT 2017 Comparison of King Vision^® and TRUVIEW laryngoscope for postextubation visualization of vocal cord mobility in patients undergoing thyroid and major neck surgeries: A randomized clinical trial Anesth Essays Res 11 238 42 10.4103/0259-1162.200240 534168028298792 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[11] Bag SK, Hemanth Kumar V R, Krishnaveni N, Ravishankar M, Velraj J, Aruloli M. (2014). A comparative study between TRUVIEW PCD laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in viewing glottic opening and ease of intubation: A crossover study. Anesth Essays Res, 8, 372–76. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143152 BagSK Hemanth KumarV R KrishnaveniN RavishankarM VelrajJ AruloliM 2014 A comparative study between TRUVIEW PCD laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in viewing glottic opening and ease of intubation: A crossover study Anesth Essays Res 8 372 76 10.4103/0259-1162.143152 425895725886338 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar