Evaluation of the effect of Intubation Box Use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision® and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Maniar A, Jagannathan B. (2020). The aerosol box. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 36, Suppl S1, 141–43. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_283_20ManiarAJagannathanB2020The aerosol boxJ Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol36Suppl S11414310.4103/joacp.JOACP_283_20757398833100666Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Begley L, Lavery KE, Nickson CP, Brewster DJ. (2020). The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study. Anaesthesia, 75, 1014–21. doi: 10.1111/anae.15115BegleyLLaveryKENicksonCPBrewsterDJ2020The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover studyAnaesthesia7510142110.1111/anae.15115727301732397008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sorbello M, Rosenblatt W, Hofmeyr R, Greif R, Urdaneta F. (2020). Aerosol boxes and barrier enclosures for airway management in COVID-19 patients: a scoping review and narrative synthesis. Br J Anaesth., 125(6), 880–94. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.038SorbelloMRosenblattWHofmeyrRGreifRUrdanetaF2020Aerosol boxes and barrier enclosures for airway management in COVID-19 patients: a scoping review and narrative synthesisBr J Anaesth.12568809410.1016/j.bja.2020.08.038747071232977955Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Canelli R, Connor CW, Gonzalez M, Nozari A, Ortega R. (2020). Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med., 382, 1957–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007589CanelliRConnorCWGonzalezMNozariAOrtegaR2020Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubationN Engl J Med.38219575810.1056/NEJMc2007589715133332243118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. (1998). Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med., 5, 919–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.xLevitanRMOchrochEAKushSShoferFSHollanderJE1998Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scaleAcad Emerg Med.59192310.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x9754506Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dwivedi D, Bhatia P, Aggarwal M, Sen S, Hooda B, Dudeja P. (2020). A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study. J Mar Med Soc, 22, Suppl S1, 88–92. doi: 10.4103/jmms.jmms_100_20DwivediDBhatiaPAggarwalMSenSHoodaBDudejaP2020A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot studyJ Mar Med Soc22Suppl S1889210.4103/jmms.jmms_100_20Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kannaujia A, Haldar R, Shamim R, Mishra P, Agarwal A. (2021). Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID19 era: A manikin based pilot study. Saudi J Anaesth 2021;15:86–92. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_1062_20.KannaujiaAHaldarRShamimRMishraPAgarwalA2021Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID19 era: A manikin based pilot studySaudi J Anaesth202115869210.4103/sja.sja_1062_20819126334188622Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wakabayashi R, Ishida1 T, Yamada T, Kawamata M. (2020). Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty. Journal of Anesthesia, 34, 790–93. doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02835-2WakabayashiRIshida1TYamadaTKawamataM2020Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficultyJournal of Anesthesia3479093doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02835-210.1007/s00540-020-02835-2738741632728963Search in Google Scholar
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Protective Barrier Enclosures Without Negative Pressure Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic May Increase Risk to Patients and Health Care Providers-Letter to Health Care Providers. U.S. Food Drug Adminstration.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration2020Protective Barrier Enclosures Without Negative Pressure Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic May Increase Risk to Patients and Health Care Providers-Letter to Health Care ProvidersU.S. Food Drug AdminstrationSearch in Google Scholar
Priyanka AS, Nag K, Hemanth Kumar V R, Singh DR, Kumar S, Sivashanmugam T. (2017). Comparison of King Vision® and TRUVIEW laryngoscope for postextubation visualization of vocal cord mobility in patients undergoing thyroid and major neck surgeries: A randomized clinical trial. Anesth Essays Res, 11, 238–42. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.200240PriyankaASNagKHemanth KumarV RSinghDRKumarSSivashanmugamT2017Comparison of King Vision® and TRUVIEW laryngoscope for postextubation visualization of vocal cord mobility in patients undergoing thyroid and major neck surgeries: A randomized clinical trialAnesth Essays Res112384210.4103/0259-1162.200240534168028298792Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bag SK, Hemanth Kumar V R, Krishnaveni N, Ravishankar M, Velraj J, Aruloli M. (2014). A comparative study between TRUVIEW PCD laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in viewing glottic opening and ease of intubation: A crossover study. Anesth Essays Res, 8, 372–76. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143152BagSKHemanth KumarV RKrishnaveniNRavishankarMVelrajJAruloliM2014A comparative study between TRUVIEW PCD laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in viewing glottic opening and ease of intubation: A crossover studyAnesth Essays Res83727610.4103/0259-1162.143152425895725886338Open DOISearch in Google Scholar