[
Angiolini, C., Ducato, R., Giannapoulou, A., & Schneider, G. (2020). Remote teaching during the emergency and beyond: Four open privacy and data protection issues of ‘platformised’ education. Opinio Juris in Comparatione, 1(1), 45-72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold, I. (2016). Cheating at online formative tests: does it pay off? The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 98-106.10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2021). Online cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 182, 196-211.10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cahapay, M. (2021). Problems encountered by college students in online assessment amid Covid-19 crisis: A case study. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology for Education. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3791771
10.21742/IJCSITE.2021.6.1.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chin, M. (2020). Exam anxiety: How remote test-proctoring is creeping students out. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/29/21232777/examity-remote-test-proctoring-online-class-education
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christie, B. (2003). Designing online courses to discourage dishonesty: Incorporate a multilayered approach to promote honest student learning. Educause Quarterly, 11(4), 54-58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cluskey, G., Jr, Ehlen, C., & Raiborn, M. (2011). Thwarting online exam cheating without proctor supervision. Journal of Academic & Business Ethics, 4, 1-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coghlan, S., Miller, T., & Paterson, J. (2020). Good proctor or “big brother”? AI ethics and online exam supervision technologies. arXiv preprint retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.07647
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dendir, S., & Maxwell, R. (2020). Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, Article 100033.10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’Souza, K., & Siegfeldt, D. (2017). A conceptual framework for detecting cheating in online and take-home exams. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 15(4), 370-391.10.1111/dsji.12140
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fask, A., Englander, F., & Wang, Z. (2014). Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 101-112.10.1007/s10805-014-9207-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffiths, B. (2020). Returning to campus during the Covid-19 pandemic: Perceptions of calculus students in Florida. In I. Sahin & M. Shelley (Eds.), Educational Practices during the Covid-19 Viral Outbreak: International Perspectives (pp. 239-251). ISTES Organization.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harmon, O., Lambrinos, J., & Buffolino, J. (2010). Assessment design and cheating risk in online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13, Article 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joyce, D. (2006). Raising awareness about academic integrity. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(3), 350.10.1145/1140123.1140259
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kharbat, F., and Abu Daabes, A. (2021). E-proctored exams during the Covid-19 pandemic: A close understanding. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6589-6605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10458-7
10.1007/s10639-021-10458-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
King, C., Guyette, R., & Piotrowski, C. (2009). Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1-11.10.9743/JEO.2009.1.5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lancaster, T., & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: a Covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 17, Article 3.10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, H., Xu, M., Wang, Y., Wei, H., & Qu, H. (2021). A visual analytics approach to facilitate the proctoring of online exams. In Proceedings of the CHI 2021 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 682). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meade, J. (1992). Cheating: Is academic dishonesty par for the course? ASEE Prism, 7(1), 30-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reedy, A., Pfitzner, D., Rook, L., & Ellis, L. (2021). Responding to the Covid-19 emergency: Student and academic staff perceptions of academic integrity in the transition to online exams at three Australian universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17, Article 9.10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rusak, G., & Yan, L. (2021). Unique exams: Designing assessments for integrity and fairness. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science (pp. 1170-76). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, C. (2006). Faculty perceptions about e-cheating during online testing. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(2), 206-212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salmons, J. (2008). Expect originality! Using taxonomies to structure assignments that support original work. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Student Plagiarism in an Online World: Problems and Solutions (pp. 208-227). New York: Information Science Reference.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tiong, L., & Lee, H. (2021). E-cheating prevention measures: Detection of cheating at online examinations using deep learning approach – a case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.09841.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vasquez, J., Chiang, E., & Sarmiento-Barbieri, I. (2021). Can we stay one step ahead of cheaters? A field experiment in proctoring online open book exams. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, Article 101653.10.1016/j.socec.2020.101653
]Search in Google Scholar
