This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
World Health Organization. Colorectal cancer. [internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Accessible at: https://Www.Who.Int/News-Room/Fact-Sheets/Detail/Colorectal-CancerWorld Health OrganizationColorectal cancer[internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Accessible at: https://Www.Who.Int/News-Room/Fact-Sheets/Detail/Colorectal-CancerSearch in Google Scholar
Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Strömberg C, Jonas E, Freedman J. Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer 2018; 18: 78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3925-xEngstrandJNilssonHStrömbergCJonasEFreedmanJColorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survivalBMC Cancer2018187810.1186/s12885-017-3925-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 254–9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217629.94941.cfManfrediSLepageCHatemCCoatmeurOFaivreJBouvierAMEpidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancerAnn Surg2006244254910.1097/01.sla.0000217629.94941.cfOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Phelip JM, Tougeron D, Léonard D, Desolneux G, Dupré A, Michel P, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR). Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 1357–63. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.035PhelipJMTougeronDLéonardDDesolneuxGDupréAMichelPMetastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR)Dig Liver Dis20195113576310.1016/j.dld.2019.05.035Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sasaki K, Morioka D, Conci S, Margonis GA, Sawada Y, Ruzzenente A, et al. The tumor burden score: a new “metro-ticket” prognostic tool for colorectal liver metastases based on tumor size and number of tumors. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 132–41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002064SasakiKMoriokaDConciSMargonisGASawadaYRuzzenenteAThe tumor burden score: a new “metro-ticket” prognostic tool for colorectal liver metastases based on tumor size and number of tumorsAnn Surg20182671324110.1097/SLA.0000000000002064Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gagnière J, Dupré A, Gholami SS, Pezet D, Boerner T, Gönen M, et al. Is hepatectomy justified for braf mutant colorectal liver metastases? A multi-institutional analysis of 1497 patients. Ann Surg 2020, 271: 147–54. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002968GagnièreJDupréAGholamiSSPezetDBoernerTGönenMIs hepatectomy justified for braf mutant colorectal liver metastases? A multi-institutional analysis of 1497 patientsAnn Surg20202711475410.1097/SLA.0000000000002968Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Copher GH, Dick BM. “Stream line” phenomena in the portal vein and the selective distribution of portal blood in the liver. Arch Surg 1928; 17: 408–19.CopherGHDickBM“Stream line” phenomena in the portal vein and the selective distribution of portal blood in the liverArch Surg19281740819Search in Google Scholar
Konopke R, Distler M, Ludwig S, Kersting S. Location of liver metastases reflects the site of the primary colorectal carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 192–5. doi: 10.1080/00365520701677755KonopkeRDistlerMLudwigSKerstingSLocation of liver metastases reflects the site of the primary colorectal carcinomaScand J Gastroenterol200843192510.1080/00365520701677755Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Desai AG, Park CH, Schilling JF. “Streaming” in portal vein. its effect on the spread of metastases to the liver. Clin Nucl Med 1985; 10: 556–9.DesaiAGParkCHSchillingJF“Streaming” in portal vein. its effect on the spread of metastases to the liverClin Nucl Med1985105569Search in Google Scholar
Rhu J, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Kim JM, Joh JW, et al. Streamline flow of the portal vein affects the lobar distribution of colorectal liver metastases and has a clinical impact on survival. Ann Surg Treat Res 2017; 92: 348. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.92.5.348RhuJHeoJSChoiSHChoiDWKimJMJohJWStreamline flow of the portal vein affects the lobar distribution of colorectal liver metastases and has a clinical impact on survivalAnn Surg Treat Res20179234810.4174/astr.2017.92.5.348Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Paturet G. Traité on human anatomy, Volume III. [French]. Paris: Masson & C; 1958. p. 856–9.PaturetGTraité on human anatomyIII[French].ParisMasson & C19588569Search in Google Scholar
Trigaux JP, Beers B, Melange M, Buysschaert M. Alcoholic liver disease: value of the left-to-right portal vein ratio in its sonographic diagnosis. Gastrointest Radiol 1991; 16: 215–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01887349TrigauxJPBeersBMelangeMBuysschaertMAlcoholic liver disease: value of the left-to-right portal vein ratio in its sonographic diagnosisGastrointest Radiol1991162152010.1007/BF01887349Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Arbeille PP, Besnard SS, Kerbeci PP, Mohty DM. Portal vein cross-sectional area and flow and orthostatic tolerance: A 90-day bed rest study. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1853–7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00331.2005ArbeillePPBesnardSSKerbeciPPMohtyDMPortal vein cross-sectional area and flow and orthostatic tolerance: A 90-day bed rest studyJ Appl Physiol2005991853710.1152/japplphysiol.00331.2005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee WK, Chang SD, Duddalwar VA, Comin JM, Perera W, Lau WF, et al. Imaging assessment of congenital and acquired abnormalities of the portal venous system. Radiographics 2011; 31: 905–26. doi: 10.1148/rg.314105104LeeWKChangSDDuddalwarVACominJMPereraWLauWFImaging assessment of congenital and acquired abnormalities of the portal venous systemRadiographics2011319052610.1148/rg.314105104Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Covey AM, Brody LA, Getrajdman GI, Sofocleous CT, Brown KT. Incidence, patterns, and clinical relevance of variant portal vein anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1055–64. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831055CoveyAMBrodyLAGetrajdmanGISofocleousCTBrownKTIncidence, patterns, and clinical relevance of variant portal vein anatomyAJR Am J Roentgenol200418310556410.2214/ajr.183.4.1831055Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hadjis NS, Hemingway A, Carr D, Blumgart LH. Liver lobe disparity consequent upon atrophy. J Hepatol 1986; 3: 285–93. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(86)80480-9HadjisNSHemingwayACarrDBlumgartLHLiver lobe disparity consequent upon atrophyJ Hepatol198632859310.1016/s0168-8278(86)80480-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Godlewski G, Prudhomme M. Embryology and anatomy of the anorectum. Basis of surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80: 319–43. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70408-4GodlewskiGPrudhommeMEmbryology and anatomy of the anorectum. Basis of surgerySurg Clin North Am2000803194310.1016/s0039-6109(05)70408-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carneiro C, Brito J, Bilreiro C, Barros M, Bahia C, Santiago I, et al. All about portal vein: A pictorial display to anatomy, variants and physiopathology. Insights Imaging 2019; 10: 38. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0716-8CarneiroCBritoJBilreiroCBarrosMBahiaCSantiagoIAll about portal vein: A pictorial display to anatomy, variants and physiopathologyInsights Imaging2019103810.1186/s13244-019-0716-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stamm ER, Meier JM, Pokharel SS, Clark T, Glueck DH, Lind KE, et al. Normal main portal vein diameter measured on CT is larger than the widely referenced upper limit of 13 mm. Abdom Radiol 2016; 41: 1931–6. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0785-9StammERMeierJMPokharelSSClarkTGlueckDHLindKENormal main portal vein diameter measured on CT is larger than the widely referenced upper limit of 13 mmAbdom Radiol2016411931610.1007/s00261-016-0785-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Givehchi S, Safari MJ, Tan SK, Shah MNB, Sani FBM, Azman RR, et al. Measurement of coronary bifurcation angle with coronary CT angiography: a phantom study. Phys Med 2018; 45: 198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.137GivehchiSSafariMJTanSKShahMNBSaniFBMAzmanRRMeasurement of coronary bifurcation angle with coronary CT angiography: a phantom studyPhys Med20184519820410.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.137Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Soyer P. Segmental anatomy of the liver: utility of a nomenclature accepted worldwide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 572–3. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352107SoyerPSegmental anatomy of the liver: utility of a nomenclature accepted worldwideAJR Am J Roentgenol1993161572310.2214/ajr.161.3.8352107Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Couinaud, C. Dorsal sector of the liver. Chirurgie 1998; 123: 8–15. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4001(98)80033-0CouinaudCDorsal sector of the liverChirurgie199812381510.1016/s0001-4001(98)80033-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Barat M, Jannot AS, Dohan A, Soyer P. How to report and compare quantitative variables in a radiology article. Diagn Interv Imaging 2022; 103: 571–3. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.007BaratMJannotASDohanASoyerPHow to report and compare quantitative variables in a radiology articleDiagn Interv Imaging2022103571310.1016/j.diii.2022.09.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Benchoufi M, Matzner-Lober E, Molinari N, Jannot AS, Soyer P. Interobserver agreement issues in radiology. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 101: 639–41. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.09.001BenchoufiMMatzner-LoberEMolinariNJannotASSoyerPInterobserver agreement issues in radiologyDiagn Interv Imaging20201016394110.1016/j.diii.2020.09.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shirai Y, Wakai T, Ohtani T, Sakai Y, Tsukada K, Hatakeyama K. Colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. does primary tumor location affect its lobar distribution? Cancer 1996; 77: 2213–6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2213:AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-QShiraiYWakaiTOhtaniTSakaiYTsukadaKHatakeyamaKColorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. does primary tumor location affect its lobar distribution?Cancer1996772213610.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2213:AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-QOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wigmore SJ, Madhavan K, Redhead DN, Currie EJ, Garden OJ. Distribution of colorectal liver metastases in patients referred for hepatic resection. Cancer 2000; 89: 285–7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<285::aid-cncr12>3.0.co;2-#WigmoreSJMadhavanKRedheadDNCurrieEJGardenOJDistribution of colorectal liver metastases in patients referred for hepatic resectionCancer200089285710.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<285::aid-cncr12>3.0.co;2-#Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Çoruh AG, Uzun Ç, Bozca E, Bozca B, Demir IB, Atasever HG, et al. Is it possible to predict the side of hepatic metastases according to the primary location of colorectal cancer? Pol J Radiol 2020; 85: e595–e9. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2020.99848ÇoruhAGUzunÇBozcaEBozcaBDemirIBAtaseverHGIs it possible to predict the side of hepatic metastases according to the primary location of colorectal cancer?Pol J Radiol202085e595e910.5114/pjr.2020.99848Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shin AE, Giancotti FG, Rustgi AK. Metastatic colorectal cancer: mechanisms and emerging therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2023; 44: 222–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2023.01.003ShinAEGiancottiFGRustgiAKMetastatic colorectal cancer: mechanisms and emerging therapeuticsTrends Pharmacol Sci2023442223610.1016/j.tips.2023.01.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nader E, Skinner S, Romana M, Fort R, Lemonne N, Guillot N, et al. Blood rheology: key parameters, impact on blood flow, role in sickle cell disease and effects of exercise. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 1329. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01329NaderESkinnerSRomanaMFortRLemonneNGuillotNBlood rheology: key parameters, impact on blood flow, role in sickle cell disease and effects of exerciseFront Physiol201910132910.3389/fphys.2019.01329Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Khan D, Khan AK, Khan SD, Aman M, Amin A, Wassem M, et al. The tendency of segmental distribution of hepatic metastasis according to couinaud classification: a comparison of portal versus systemic route of metastasis due to primary colorectal and breast tumors. Ann Med Surg 2023; 85: 4806–10. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001241KhanDKhanAKKhanSDAmanMAminAWassemMThe tendency of segmental distribution of hepatic metastasis according to couinaud classification: a comparison of portal versus systemic route of metastasis due to primary colorectal and breast tumorsAnn Med Surg20238548061010.1097/MS9.0000000000001241Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tsai MS, Su YH, Ho MC, Liang JT, Chen TP, Lai HS, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis in resectable synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 786–94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9215-5TsaiMSSuYHHoMCLiangJTChenTPLaiHSClinicopathological features and prognosis in resectable synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastasisAnn Surg Oncol2007147869410.1245/s10434-006-9215-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yao H, Wang Y. Relationship between hemodynamic parameters and portal venous pressure in cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension. Open Life Sci 2020; 15: 981–7. doi: 10.1515/biol-2020-0101.YaoHWangYRelationship between hemodynamic parameters and portal venous pressure in cirrhosis patients with portal hypertensionOpen Life Sci202015981710.1515/biol-2020-0101Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bissonnette J, Généreux A, Côté J, Nguyen B, Perreault P, Bouchard L, et al. Hepatic hemodynamics in 24 patients with nodular regenerative hyperplasia and symptomatic portal hypertension. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 1336–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07168.x.BissonnetteJGénéreuxACôtéJNguyenBPerreaultPBouchardLHepatic hemodynamics in 24 patients with nodular regenerative hyperplasia and symptomatic portal hypertensionJ Gastroenterol Hepatol20122713364010.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07168.x.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Memeo R, de Blasi V, Adam R, Goéré D, Azoulay D, Ayav A, et al. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases are associated with a lower morbidity and similar oncological results: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB 2016; 18: 781–90. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.004MemeoRde BlasiVAdamRGoéréDAzoulayDAyavAParenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases are associated with a lower morbidity and similar oncological results: a propensity score matching analysisHPB2016187819010.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar