Asbestos exposure is related to several pleural diseases, such as pleural plaques, diffuse pleural thickenings, pleural effusions and malignant mesothelioma (MM). MM is an aggressive form of cancer found on the mesothelium, generally on the pleura (65%), peritoneum (30%) or other serosal membranes (1%).1, 2
MM is often diagnosed in its later stages, is rarely operable and can respond poorly to conventional chemotherapy.3 Clinical signs and symptoms are uncharacteristic and reminiscent of many other pulmonary diseases. Patients often experience dyspnea, chest pain, weight loss and fatigue. Only a small proportion of MM patients are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis.2, 4 Average life expectancy is around 7 months with support therapy and 12 months with chemotherapy.5 MM most often occurs in patients older than 65 years.2, 6 Epidemiological studies have shown that the main cause of MM is asbestos exposure, with the incidence of this cancer still increasing due to the long latent period.7 Genetic factors have also been suggested to influence the development of MM; patients often have mutations in tumour suppressor genes, such as
Along with MM, asbestos exposure is also related to the development of pleural plaques. Pleural plaques are white and yellow thickenings of pleura, often asymmetrical and bilateral. Histologically, they are acellular, composed of hyalinised collagen, which is covered by one layer of mesothelial cells. Half of the patients with a history of asbestos exposure develop pleural plaques, typically 20 to 30 years after exposure. The risk of pleural plaques rises with the length of asbestos exposure.10 It has been proposed that inflammation caused by asbestos is involved in the pathogenesis of both pleural plaques and MM.3, 11 Asbestos fibres are known to trigger the release of inflammatory mediators, which leads to the downregulation of apoptosis.3
After inhalation, asbestos fibres reach pleural space and are deposited in mesothelial cells.12 This leads to local inflammatory response and proliferation of mesothelial cells.
In response to asbestos, an intrinsic inflammatory mechanism triggers inflammation via inflammasome NLRP3, which is NLR family pyrin domain containing 3, activated by danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP).13, 14 NLRP3 inflammasome is a protein complex of NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (ASC) and caspase-1, found in macrophages, which triggers a type of apoptosis, known as piroptosis.11, 13, 15 The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome increases the production of IL-1β from its precursor, mediated by caspase-1 and pro-inflammatory mediators from macrophages.8,15,16 IL-1β, coded by
IL-1β release can also be regulated by miRNAs, 21-23 nucleotides long non-coding RNAs, which inhibit translation by binding to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of mRNA.19 miRNAs are involved in networks of gene regulation and their expression often changes in cancerous tissue, including MM.20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 A key miRNA, influencing the expression of
Genetic factors, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), may influence protein expression.17, 28, 29
To the best of our knowledge, the role of
The retrospective case-control study included 277 patients with histologically confirmed pleural or peritoneal MM, treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana between 1 January 2001 and 30 September 2018, 394 patients with pleural plaques and 175 healthy control subjects, all of whom were previously exposed to asbestos. The control group and those with pleural plaques were occupationally exposed to asbestos by working in the factory Salonit Anhovo, Slovenia, and were presented at the State Board for the Recognition of Occupational Asbestos Diseases between January 1999 and December 2003. In 2018, the subjects from the control group were found not to have any asbestos-related disease.
The study was approved by the Slovenian Ethics Committee for Research in Medicine and was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patients with pleural plaques have been diagnosed based on X-ray and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), while MM diagnosis was confirmed by a pathologist based on the histopathology of samples gathered thoracoscopically in the case of the pleural and laparoscopically in the case of the peritoneal type of MM.2,36, 37
A semiquantative method was used to assess the asbestos exposure. The data on cumulative asbestos exposure expressed in fibres/cm3-years were available for all control subjects, all subjects with pleural plaques except for 6, and for 40 subjects with MM. Based on these data, the asbestos exposure in these subjects was categorised into three groups: low (< 11 fibres/cm3-years), medium (11–20 fibres/cm3-years) and high (> 20 fibres/cm3-years) asbestos exposure. For additional 49 subjects with MM who lacked the data on cumulative asbestos exposure a thorough work history was obtained by an interview performed by a single expert experienced in asbestos exposure assessment. Their exposures were compared with the exposures from the group of patients with known cumulative asbestos exposure and were categorized accordingly into three groups with presumed low, medium and high asbestos exposure.2 For the remaining 188 MM patients, exact data on asbestos exposure were not available.
An interview based on a standardized questionnaire was conducted with the control group and patients with pleural plaques to collect data on smoking, while the medical documentation of the Institute of Oncology of Ljubljana was used to obtain this piece of data for patients with MM.2, 38
Using LD Tag SNP Selection,30 dbSNP,39 Ensembl40 and LDlink41 we identified
We isolated DNA from venous blood of 44 patients with MM using E.Z.N.A.® SQ II Blood DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc., Norcross, Georgia, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples of all other subjects had been isolated during previous studies.44 Genotyping was performed using competitive allele-specific PCR (KASP), the KASP Master mix (LGC, Middlesex, UK) and custom KASP Genotyping Assay (LGC, Middlesex, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Median and interquartile range were used to describe continuous variables, while frequencies were used for categorical variables. To compare the distribution of categorical variables, Fisher’s exact test was performed, while non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous variables. Deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was evaluated using chi-square test. Both additive and dominant genetic models were used in statistical analyses. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse the association between genotypes and asbestos-related diseases (pleural plaques and MM). For the analysis of multiplicative interactions between genotypes, logistic regression models using dummy variables were used. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).
Characteristics of patients with MM and pleural plaques as well as the control group are shown in Table 1. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to age (p < 0.001) and asbestos exposure (p < 0.001). MM patients were significantly older than the control group or patients with pleural plaques. Among the subjects with known asbestos exposure, 51.7% of patients with MM had medium or high exposure compared to 23.4% of the control group and 28.4 % of patients with pleural plaques. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding gender (p = 0.410) and smoking status (p = 0.267) (Table 1).
Characteristics of subjects included in the study
Characteristics | Control group | Pleural plaques | Malignant mesothelioma | Test | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male, N (%) | 119 (68.0) | 271 (68.8) | 202 (72.9) | 1.757 calculated using Fisher exact test | 0.410 | |
Female, N (%) | 56 (32.0) | 123 (31.3) | 75 (27.1) | |||
Median (25%–75%) | 55.3 (48.6–63.7) | 54.9 (48.8–62.7) | 66.0 (59.0–73.0) | 151.666 calculated using Kruskal-Wallis test | ||
Low, N (%) | 134 (76.6) | 278 (71.6) [6] | 43 (48.3) [188] | 26.891 calculated using Fisher exact test | ||
Medium, N (%) | 13 (7.4) | 41 (10.6) | 24 (27.0) | |||
High, N (%) | 28 (16.0) | 69 (17.8) | 22 (24.7) | |||
No, N (%) | 94 (53.7) | 194 (49.4) [1] | 150 (55.6) [7] | 2.640 calculated using Fisher exact test | 0.267 | |
Yes, N (%) | 81 (46.3) | 199 (50.6) | 120 (44.4) |
number of missing data is presented in [] brackets
A further analysis of asbestos exposure showed that medium and high levels of asbestos exposure were associated with an increased risk of MM compared both to the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.03–6.02; p < 0.001) and patients with pleural plaques (OR = 2.70; 95% CI = 1.69–4.33; p < 0.001).
Among the patients with MM, 19 (6.9 %) had stage I MM, 61 (22.1 %) were in stage II of the disease, 83 (30.1 %) had stage III and 81 (29.3 %) stage IV MM. Thirty-two patients (11.6 %) had the peritoneal subtype of MM, where stage was not determined and in one patient, the MM stage could not be determined. In our cohort, the most prevalent histological subtype of MM was the epithelioid subtype (206; 74.4 %); however some of the patients had either the biphasic (26; 9.4 %) or sarcomatoid subtype (26; 9.4 %) and in the case of a few patients (19; 6.6 %), the histological subtype was not determined.
A comparison of patients with pleural plaques and healthy controls revealed no statistically significant influence on the risk of pleural plaques for any of the selected polymorphisms, neither in univariable analysis nor after adjustments for age, gender and asbestos exposure (Supplementary Table 1).
The analysis of the association between genetic polymorphisms and MM has shown statistically significant influence of polymorphism
Association between selected polymorphisms and the risk of developing malignant mesothelioma
SNP | Genotype | Controls | MM | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI)adj1 | padj1 | OR (95% CI)adj2 | padj2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GG | 88 (50.3) | 152 (54.9) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 67 (38.3) | 97 (35.0) | 0.84 (0.56–1.26) | 0.396 | 0.82 (0.52–1.29) | 0.388 | 0.56 (0.29–1.05) | 0.072 | |
CC | 20 (11.4) | 28 (10.1) | 0.81 (0.43–1.52) | 0.514 | 0.69 (0.35–1.38) | 0.294 | 0.34 (0.11–1.04) | 0.060 | |
GC+CC | 87 (49.7) | 125 (45.1) | 0.83 (0.57–1.22) | 0.341 | 0.79 (0.52–1.20) | 0.266 | |||
TT | 21 (12.0) | 36 (13.0) | 1.10 (0.60–2.02) | 0.756 | 0.94 (0.48–1.82) | 0.849 | 0.53 (0.20–1.43) | 0.210 | |
TC | 75 (42.9) | 118 (42.6) | 1.01 (0.67–1.51) | 0.960 | 0.98 (0.63–1.52) | 0.911 | 0.67 (0.36–1.24) | 0.198 | |
CC | 79 (45.1) | 123 (44.4) | reference | reference | |||||
TC+TT | 96 (54.9) | 154 (55.6) | 1.03 (0.70–1.51) | 0.878 | 0.97 (0.64–1.47) | 0.873 | 0.63 (0.35–1.13) | 0.122 | |
GG | 105 (60.0) | 165 (59.6) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 60 (34.3) | 98 (35.4) | 1.04 (0.69–1.56) | 0.851 | 0.97 (0.62–1.51) | 0.895 | 1.00 (0.53–1.89) | 0.993 | |
CC | 10 (5.7) | 14 (5.1) | 0.89 (0.38–2.08) | 0.789 | 0.96 (0.38–2.41) | 0.931 | 2.03 (0.70–5.90) | 0.194 | |
GC+CC | 70 (40.0) | 112 (40.4) | 1.02 (0.69–1.50) | 0.927 | 0.97 (0.64–1.48) | 0.885 | 1.15 (0.64–2.08) | 0.632 | |
GG | 94 (53.7) | 158 (57.0) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 64 (36.6) | 110 (39.7) | 1.02 (0.69–1.53) | 0.913 | 0.91 (0.59–1.41) | 0.672 | 0.67 (0.36–1.25) | 0.209 | |
CC | 17 (9.7) | 9 (3.2) | 0.39 (0.11–1.38) | 0.144 | |||||
GC+CC | 81 (46.3) | 119 (43.0) | 0.87 (0.60–1.28) | 0.488 | 0.79 (0.52–1.21) | 0.278 | 0.62 (0.34–1.11) | 0.109 |
adj1 = adjustment for age and gender; adj2 = adjustment for age, gender and asbestos exposure; CI = confidence interval; MM = malignant mesothelioma; OR = odds ratio; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism
In multivariable analysis, polymorphism
A comparison of patients with MM and pleural plaques showed that polymorphism
Association between selected polymorphisms and the risk of developing malignant mesothelioma compared to pleural plaques
SNP | Genotype | Pleural plaques | MM | OR (95 % CI) | p | OR (95 % CI)adj1 | padj1 | OR (95 % CI)adj2 | padj2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GG | 205 (52.0) | 152 (54.9) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 157 (39.8) | 97 (35.0) | 0.83 (0.60–1.16) | 0.277 | 0.88 (0.61–1.27) | 0.499 | 0.67 (0.39–1.15) | 0.151 | |
CC | 32 (8.1) | 28 (10.1) | 1.18 (0.68–2.04) | 0.554 | 1.07 (0.58–1.99) | 0.827 | 0.65 (0.22–1.86) | 0.418 | |
GC+CC | 189 (48.0) | 125 (45.1) | 0.89 (0.66–1.21) | 0.467 | 0.92 (0.65–1.29) | 0.617 | 0.67 (0.40–1.11) | 0.123 | |
TT | 50 (12.7) | 36 (13.0) | 1.02 (0.63–1.67) | 0.923 | 0.96 (0.56–1.67) | 0.897 | 0.54 (0.22–1.34) | 0.184 | |
TC | 169 (42.9) | 118 (42.6) | 0.99 (0.71–1.38) | 0.969 | 0.98 (0.68–1.42) | 0.929 | 0.70 (0.41–1.19) | 0.186 | |
CC | 175 (44.4) | 123 (44.4) | reference | reference | |||||
TC+TT | 219 (55.6) | 154 (55.6) | 1.00 (0.73–1.36) | 0.998 | 0.98 (0.69–1.38) | 0.905 | 0.66 (0.40–1.10) | 0.110 | |
GG | 233 (59.1) | 165 (59.6) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 145 (36.8) | 98 (35.4) | 0.95 (0.69–1.32) | 0.778 | 0.93 (0.65–1.34) | 0.708 | 0.92 (0.53–1.60) | 0.774 | |
CC | 16 (4.1) | 14 (5.1) | 1.24 (0.59–2.60) | 0.578 | 1.29 (0.56–2.97) | 0.553 | |||
GC+CC | 161 (40.9) | 112 (40.4) | 0.98 (0.72–1.34) | 0.911 | 0.97 (0.68–1.37) | 0.849 | 1.09 (0.66–1.82) | 0.731 | |
GG | 196 (49.7) | 158 (57.0) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 163 (41.4) | 110 (39.7) | 0.84 (0.61–1.15) | 0.276 | 0.84 (0.58–1.20) | 0.326 | 0.65 (0.38–1.11) | 0.118 | |
CC | 35 (8.9) | 9 (3.2) | 0.34 (0.11–1.09) | 0.069 | |||||
GC+CC | 198 (50.3) | 119 (43.0) | 0.75 (0.55–1.02) | 0.063 | 0.74 (0.53–1.05) | 0.092 |
adj1 = adjustment for age and gender; adj2 = adjustment for age, gender and asbestos exposure; CI = confidence interval; MM = malignant mesothelioma; OR = odds ratio; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism
In further logistic regression modelling, the interactions between polymorphisms showed no significant influence on the risk of pleural plaques (data not shown). The analysis of the influence of the interaction between
The association between MM and asbestos exposure has first been described in 1960 and, although very few genetic factors have been studied, multiple factors have since then been considered to influence the pathogenesis of MM.45 In the present study, we evaluated the effect of polymorphisms of IL-1β and miRNA-146a genes on the risk of developing MM and pleural plaques. The key finding of the present study was the association between
Consistent with the previous studies, the average age of MM patients was found to be higher than that of the patients with pleural plaques or the control group, probably due to the long latency period between the first asbestos exposure and MM.2, 6, 44 Our study showed no significant association between smoking and MM, which is in agreement with previous findings.2, 44, 46 Subjects with high or medium exposure to asbestos had a higher risk of developing MM, compared to the group with pleural plaques or the control group. Regardless of that, almost half (48.3%) of MM patients were exposed to low levels of asbestos, which is consistent with previous studies claiming there is no threshold level for the development of MM.47, 48
It is not yet clear to what an extent the pleural plaques present a risk factor for MM. The studies performed so far suggested that pleural plaques are more a sign of asbestos exposure, than a carcinogenic factor.49, 50 This hypothesis is in agreement with the findings of this study as the genotype frequency distribution of patients with pleural plaques was found to be more similar to that of the control group, rather than the genotype frequency distribution of patients with MM.
Compared to both the control group and the patients with pleural plaques, homozygotes with polymorphic
According to our knowledge, the relation between
Another important finding of this study has been the association between the polymorphic
Finally, this study has shown that the interaction between
Lack of asbestos exposure information for all the subjects has been identified as the limitation of our study. Therefore, the subgroup for which asbestos exposure has been taken into consideration, was smaller than the overall sample. This could account for the discrepancy between the results of the analysis adjusted for asbestos exposure and the results of the analysis that did not take asbestos exposure into account. The strength of this study is its large sample size. To the best of our knowledge, this is also the first study researching the effect of
In conclusion, our results suggest that
Association between selected polymorphisms and the risk of developing malignant mesothelioma compared to pleural plaques
SNP | Genotype | Pleural plaques | MM | OR (95 % CI) | p | OR (95 % CI)adj1 | padj1 | OR (95 % CI)adj2 | padj2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GG | 205 (52.0) | 152 (54.9) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 157 (39.8) | 97 (35.0) | 0.83 (0.60–1.16) | 0.277 | 0.88 (0.61–1.27) | 0.499 | 0.67 (0.39–1.15) | 0.151 | |
CC | 32 (8.1) | 28 (10.1) | 1.18 (0.68–2.04) | 0.554 | 1.07 (0.58–1.99) | 0.827 | 0.65 (0.22–1.86) | 0.418 | |
GC+CC | 189 (48.0) | 125 (45.1) | 0.89 (0.66–1.21) | 0.467 | 0.92 (0.65–1.29) | 0.617 | 0.67 (0.40–1.11) | 0.123 | |
TT | 50 (12.7) | 36 (13.0) | 1.02 (0.63–1.67) | 0.923 | 0.96 (0.56–1.67) | 0.897 | 0.54 (0.22–1.34) | 0.184 | |
TC | 169 (42.9) | 118 (42.6) | 0.99 (0.71–1.38) | 0.969 | 0.98 (0.68–1.42) | 0.929 | 0.70 (0.41–1.19) | 0.186 | |
CC | 175 (44.4) | 123 (44.4) | reference | reference | |||||
TC+TT | 219 (55.6) | 154 (55.6) | 1.00 (0.73–1.36) | 0.998 | 0.98 (0.69–1.38) | 0.905 | 0.66 (0.40–1.10) | 0.110 | |
GG | 233 (59.1) | 165 (59.6) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 145 (36.8) | 98 (35.4) | 0.95 (0.69–1.32) | 0.778 | 0.93 (0.65–1.34) | 0.708 | 0.92 (0.53–1.60) | 0.774 | |
CC | 16 (4.1) | 14 (5.1) | 1.24 (0.59–2.60) | 0.578 | 1.29 (0.56–2.97) | 0.553 | |||
GC+CC | 161 (40.9) | 112 (40.4) | 0.98 (0.72–1.34) | 0.911 | 0.97 (0.68–1.37) | 0.849 | 1.09 (0.66–1.82) | 0.731 | |
GG | 196 (49.7) | 158 (57.0) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 163 (41.4) | 110 (39.7) | 0.84 (0.61–1.15) | 0.276 | 0.84 (0.58–1.20) | 0.326 | 0.65 (0.38–1.11) | 0.118 | |
CC | 35 (8.9) | 9 (3.2) | 0.34 (0.11–1.09) | 0.069 | |||||
GC+CC | 198 (50.3) | 119 (43.0) | 0.75 (0.55–1.02) | 0.063 | 0.74 (0.53–1.05) | 0.092 |
Characteristics of subjects included in the study
Characteristics | Control group | Pleural plaques | Malignant mesothelioma | Test | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male, N (%) | 119 (68.0) | 271 (68.8) | 202 (72.9) | 1.757 calculated using Fisher exact test | 0.410 | |
Female, N (%) | 56 (32.0) | 123 (31.3) | 75 (27.1) | |||
Median (25%–75%) | 55.3 (48.6–63.7) | 54.9 (48.8–62.7) | 66.0 (59.0–73.0) | 151.666 calculated using Kruskal-Wallis test | ||
Low, N (%) | 134 (76.6) | 278 (71.6) [6] | 43 (48.3) [188] | 26.891 calculated using Fisher exact test | ||
Medium, N (%) | 13 (7.4) | 41 (10.6) | 24 (27.0) | |||
High, N (%) | 28 (16.0) | 69 (17.8) | 22 (24.7) | |||
No, N (%) | 94 (53.7) | 194 (49.4) [1] | 150 (55.6) [7] | 2.640 calculated using Fisher exact test | 0.267 | |
Yes, N (%) | 81 (46.3) | 199 (50.6) | 120 (44.4) |
Association between selected polymorphisms and the risk of developing malignant mesothelioma
SNP | Genotype | Controls | MM | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI)adj1 | padj1 | OR (95% CI)adj2 | padj2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GG | 88 (50.3) | 152 (54.9) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 67 (38.3) | 97 (35.0) | 0.84 (0.56–1.26) | 0.396 | 0.82 (0.52–1.29) | 0.388 | 0.56 (0.29–1.05) | 0.072 | |
CC | 20 (11.4) | 28 (10.1) | 0.81 (0.43–1.52) | 0.514 | 0.69 (0.35–1.38) | 0.294 | 0.34 (0.11–1.04) | 0.060 | |
GC+CC | 87 (49.7) | 125 (45.1) | 0.83 (0.57–1.22) | 0.341 | 0.79 (0.52–1.20) | 0.266 | |||
TT | 21 (12.0) | 36 (13.0) | 1.10 (0.60–2.02) | 0.756 | 0.94 (0.48–1.82) | 0.849 | 0.53 (0.20–1.43) | 0.210 | |
TC | 75 (42.9) | 118 (42.6) | 1.01 (0.67–1.51) | 0.960 | 0.98 (0.63–1.52) | 0.911 | 0.67 (0.36–1.24) | 0.198 | |
CC | 79 (45.1) | 123 (44.4) | reference | reference | |||||
TC+TT | 96 (54.9) | 154 (55.6) | 1.03 (0.70–1.51) | 0.878 | 0.97 (0.64–1.47) | 0.873 | 0.63 (0.35–1.13) | 0.122 | |
GG | 105 (60.0) | 165 (59.6) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 60 (34.3) | 98 (35.4) | 1.04 (0.69–1.56) | 0.851 | 0.97 (0.62–1.51) | 0.895 | 1.00 (0.53–1.89) | 0.993 | |
CC | 10 (5.7) | 14 (5.1) | 0.89 (0.38–2.08) | 0.789 | 0.96 (0.38–2.41) | 0.931 | 2.03 (0.70–5.90) | 0.194 | |
GC+CC | 70 (40.0) | 112 (40.4) | 1.02 (0.69–1.50) | 0.927 | 0.97 (0.64–1.48) | 0.885 | 1.15 (0.64–2.08) | 0.632 | |
GG | 94 (53.7) | 158 (57.0) | reference | reference | |||||
GC | 64 (36.6) | 110 (39.7) | 1.02 (0.69–1.53) | 0.913 | 0.91 (0.59–1.41) | 0.672 | 0.67 (0.36–1.25) | 0.209 | |
CC | 17 (9.7) | 9 (3.2) | 0.39 (0.11–1.38) | 0.144 | |||||
GC+CC | 81 (46.3) | 119 (43.0) | 0.87 (0.60–1.28) | 0.488 | 0.79 (0.52–1.21) | 0.278 | 0.62 (0.34–1.11) | 0.109 |