Accès libre

Metacognitive Competences and Implicit Theories of Intelligence in Relation with School Achievement

À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Adamsone, I., Gudakovska, N., & Svence, G., (2020), Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: Review of two studies in Latvia, „Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century”, 14(1), 7-17 Search in Google Scholar

2. Akin, E.,(2016), Examining the relation between metacognitive understanding of what is listened to and metacognitive awareness levels of secondary school students, „Educational Research and Reviews”, 11(7), 390-401 Search in Google Scholar

3. Ames, C., (1992), Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate, in D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), „Student perceptions in the classroom”, 327-348, Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

4. Ashdown, D. M., & Bernard, M. E., (2012), Can explicit instruction in social and emotional learning skills benefit the social-emotional development, well-being, and academic achievement of young children?, „Early Childhood Education Journal”, 39(6), 397-405 Search in Google Scholar

5. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S., (2007), Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention, „Child Development”, 78(1), 246-263 Search in Google Scholar

6. Branigan, H. E., & Donaldson, D. I., (2020), Teachers matter for metacognition: Facilitating metacognition in the primary school through teacher-pupil interactions, „Thinking Skills and Creativity”, 38, 10071810.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718 Search in Google Scholar

7. Brown, A.L., Bransford, J.D., Ferrara, R.A., & Campione, J.C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In J.H. Flavell & E.M. Markman (Eds.), P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.), „Handbook of child psychology 4th ed. Cognitive development”, 3 (77-166), New York: John Wiley & Sons Search in Google Scholar

8. Cedeño, L.F., Martínez-Arias, R., & Bueno, J.A., (2016), Implications of Socioeconomic Status on Academic Competence: A Perspective for Teachers, „International Education Studies”, 9, 257-26710.5539/ies.v9n4p257 Search in Google Scholar

9. Cogliano, M., Bernacki, M. L., & Kardash, C. M., (2020), A metacognitive retrieval practice intervention to improve undergraduates’ monitoring and control processes and use of performance feedback for classroom learning, „Journal of Educational Psychology”. Advanced online publication, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2124443276, link accessed on January 2021 Search in Google Scholar

10. Costa, A., & Faria, L., (2018), Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review, „Frontiers in Psychology”, vol. 9, Article 829, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829 /full, link accessed on January, 2021 Search in Google Scholar

11. Daher, W., Anabousy, A. & Jabarin, R., (2018), Metacognition, positioning and emotions in mathematical activities, „International Journal of Research in Education and Science”, 4(1), 292-303 Search in Google Scholar

12. Destin M, Hanselman P, Buontempo J, Tipton E, Yeager DS, (2019), Do Student Mindsets Differ by Socioeconomic Status and Explain Disparities in Academic Achievement in the United States?, „Advances in Developing Human Resources”, 5 (3), 1–1210.1177/2332858419857706 Search in Google Scholar

13. Dolean, D., Melby-Lervåg, M., Tincas, I., Damsa, C., & Lervåg, A., (2019), Achievement gap: Socioeconomic status affects reading development beyond language and cognition in children facing poverty, „Learning and Instruction”, 63, 101218, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475218308703, link accesed on December, 2020 Search in Google Scholar

14. Dupeyrat, C. & Mariné, C., (2005), Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults, „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, Vol. 30 (1), 43-59 Search in Google Scholar

15. Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S., (1983), Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (eds.), „Handbook of chid psychology”,Vol. IV. „Social and personality development”, 643-691, New York: Wiley Search in Google Scholar

16. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L., (1988), A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality, „Psychological Review”, 95(2), 256-273 Search in Google Scholar

17. Dweck, C.S., (2006), „Mindset. The New Psychology of Succes”, New York: Random House Search in Google Scholar

18. Dweck, C.S., Chiu, C. & Hong, Y, (1995), Implicit Theories: Elaboration and Extension of the Model, „Psychological Inquiry”, 6, 322-33310.1207/s15327965pli0604_12 Search in Google Scholar

19. Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T. & Rennie D.L, (1999), Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields, „British Journal of Clinical Psychology”, 38, 215-22910.1348/014466599162782 Search in Google Scholar

20. Flavell, J., (1979), Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry, „American Psychologist”, 34, 906-91110.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 Search in Google Scholar

21. Hackman, D., Farah, M. & Meaney, M., (2010), Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research., „Nature Reviws Neuroscience”, 11, 651-65910.1038/nrn2897 Search in Google Scholar

22. Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S., (2016), What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets? Not their parents’ views of intelligence but their parents’ views of failure, „Psychological Science”, 27(6), 859-869 Search in Google Scholar

23. Hong, Y.-Y., Chiu, C.-Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M.-S., & Wan, W., (1999), Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 77(3), 588-599 Search in Google Scholar

24. Jacobs, J., & Paris, S., (1987), Children’s metacognition about reading. Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. „Educational Psychologist”, 22, 255-278 Search in Google Scholar

25. Keus, K., & Haave, N. C., (2020), Using a learning philosophy assignment to capture students’ metacognition and achievement goals, „The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning”, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.1.815, link accesed on January, 2021 Search in Google Scholar

26. Khajehpour, M., & Ghazvini, S. D., (2011), The role of parental involvement affect in children’s academic performance, „Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences”, 15, 1204-120810.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.263 Search in Google Scholar

27. OECD, (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris Search in Google Scholar

28. OECD, (2020), Students’ self-efficacy and fear of failure, in PISA 2018 Results 3, What School Life Means for Students’ Lives (40-42), OECD Publishing, Paris Search in Google Scholar

29. Oyserman, D.& Lewis, N.A., Jr., (2017), Seeing the Destination AND the Path: Using Identity-Based Motivation to Understand and Reduce Racial Disparities in Academic Achievement, „Social Issues and Policy Review”, vol. 11, 159-194 Search in Google Scholar

30. Padmanabha, C. H., (2020), Metacognition: Conceptual Framework, „Journal on Educational Psychology”, 14(1), 1-11 Search in Google Scholar

31. Park, D., Kim S., (2015), Time to Move On? When Entity Theorists Perform Better Than Incremental Theorists, „Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 41(5),736-748 Search in Google Scholar

32. Pintrich, P., (2002), The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing, „Theory Into Practice”, 4(4), 219-225 Search in Google Scholar

33. Rahman, F., Jumani, N.B., Chaudry, M.A., Chisti, S.U., & Abbasi, F., (2010), Impact Of Metacognitive Awareness On Performance Of Students In Chemistry, „Contemporary Issues in Education Research”, vol. 3, 39-44 Search in Google Scholar

34. Rhodes, M. G., (2019), Metacognition, „Teaching of Psychology”, 46(2), 168-175 Search in Google Scholar

35. Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J., (2014), Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories, „Emotion”, 14(2), 227-234 Search in Google Scholar

36. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K., (2002), The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents, in T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), „Applied metacognition”, 224-257, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511489976.011 Search in Google Scholar

37. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K., (2008), Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & B. Bjork (Eds.), „A handbook of memory and metacognition”, 391-409, Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum Search in Google Scholar

38. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S., (1994), Assessing metacognitive awareness, „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, 19(4), 460-475 Search in Google Scholar

39. Schraw, G., (1998), Promoting general metacognitive awareness, „Instructional Science”, 26, 113-12510.1023/A:1003044231033 Search in Google Scholar

40. Seo, E., Lee, H. Y., Jamieson, J. P., Reis, H. T., Beevers, C. G., & Yeager, D. S., (2019), Trait attributions and threat appraisals explain the relation between implicit theories of personality and internalizing symptoms during adolescence, „Development and Psychopathology”, 33(2), 1-11 Search in Google Scholar

41. Soto, C., Blume, A., Bernal, M. & Castro, M., (2020), The Role of Metacognitive Cues on the Comprehension of Proficient and Poor Readers, „Journal of Research in Reading”, 43, 272-28910.1111/1467-9817.12303 Search in Google Scholar

42. Soto, C., Blume, A.P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., Riffo, B., & Kruk, R., (2019), Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills, „Cogent Education”, 6, 1565067, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067, link accesed on January, 2021 Search in Google Scholar

43. Tanner K. D., (2012), Promoting student metacognition, „CBE life sciences education”, 11(2), 113-12010.1187/cbe.12-03-0033 Search in Google Scholar

44. Thenmozhi, C., (2019), Models of metacognition, „Shanlax International Journal of Education”, 7(2), 1-4 Search in Google Scholar

45. Wang, Y., Wu, C.- H., Parker, S.K. & Griffin, M.A., (2018), Developing goal orientations conducive to learning and performance: An intervention study, „Journal of Occupational Organizational Psychology”, 91, 875-89510.1111/joop.12227 Search in Google Scholar

46. Yeager, D. S. & Dweck, C., S., (2012), Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed, „Educational Psychologist”, 47 (4), 302-31410.1080/00461520.2012.722805 Search in Google Scholar

47. Young, A. E., & Worrell, F. C., (2018), Comparing metacognition assessments of mathematics, academically talented students, „Gifted Child Quarterly”, 62(3), 259-275. Search in Google Scholar