Determination of Seakeeping Performance for a Case Study Vessel by the Strip Theory Method

1. J. Dudziak, Theory of ships (in Polish), Gdansk: Fundacja Promocji Przemysłu Okrętowego i Gospodarki Morskiej, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

2. “The Nordic Cooperative Project: “Seakeeping Performance of Ship”, Assessment of Ship Performance in a Seaway, Marintek,” Norway, Trondheim, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

3. T. Cepowski, Modelling of seakeeping qualities of open-top container carriers in the preliminary design phase. Polish Maritime Research 2(69) 2011 Vol 18; pp. 19-2710.2478/v10012-011-0008-9Search in Google Scholar

4. K. Sarioz and E. Narli, “Effect of criteria on seakeeping performance assessment,” Ocean Engineering, p. 116101173, 25 02 2005.Search in Google Scholar

5. I. Mudronja, P. Vidan, and J. Parunov, “Review of seakeeping criteria for container ship sustainable speed calculation in rough weather,” Maritime Technology and Engineering, pp. 1059-1064, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

6. B. Abeil, “Seakeeping Aspects in the Design of Survey Vessels,” in ICSOT: Developments in Ship Design & Construction, Ambon, 2012.10.3940/rina.icsotin.2012.17Search in Google Scholar

7. NATO, “NATO STANAG 4154, Common Procedures for Seakeeping in the Ship Design Process,” 1997.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bentley Systems, Motions Program & User Manual, Bentley Systems, 2016.10.1136/bmj.i5173Search in Google Scholar

9. ABS, Guide for passenger comfort on ship, Houston: American Bureau of Shipping, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

10. DNV, Rules for Classification of Ships - Special Service and Type additional Class, Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

11. LR, Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships, United Kingdom: Lloyd’s Register, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

12. PRS, Publication No. 32/P – Requirements for Cargo Distribution and Fastening on Sea-going Vessels (in Polish), Gdansk: Polish Register of Shipping, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

13. IMO, MEPC.1/CIrc.850/rev.1, 15 July 2015.Search in Google Scholar

14. IMO, MSC.1/Circ.1228, 11 January 2007.Search in Google Scholar

15. IMO, “Resolution MEPC.308(73) – Annex 5 – Guidelines on the method of calculation of the attained energy efficiency design index (EEDI) for new ships,” 2018.Search in Google Scholar

16. J. Gelling, “The Axe Bow: The Shape of Ships to Come,” in 19th International HISWA Symposium on Yacht Design and Yacht Construction, Amsterdam, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

17. J. L. Gelling and J. A. Keuning, “Recent Developments in the Design of Fast Ships,” HISWA International Symposium on Yacht Design & Construction, Vol. 5, July, pp. 57-68, 2010.10.25043/19098642.51Search in Google Scholar

18. J. Keuning, J. Pinkster, and F. van Walree, “Further Investigation into the Hydrodynamic Performance of the AXE Bow Concept,” in Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on High Speed, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

19. A. R. J. M. Lloyd, Lloyd, Seakeeping – ship behaviour in rough weather, A R J M Lloyds, 26 Sprithead Avenue, Gosport, United Kingdom, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

20. Ulstein, “X-BOW – how it started,” 18 August, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ulstein.com/innovations/x-bow. [Date of access: 25 November 2018].Search in Google Scholar

21. K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, “Full scale CFD seakeeping simulations for case study ship redesigned from V-shaped bulbous bow to X-bow hull form,” Applied Ocean Research, pp. 188-201, 2019, doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.011.10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.011Search in Google Scholar

22. J. K. White, “PhD Thesis: Numerical and experimental investigation of the effect of an inverted bow on the hydrodynamic performance of Navy combatant hull forms,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015.10.5957/WMTC-2015-038Search in Google Scholar

23. S. Hunt, “Comparison of experimental and analytical methods for optimization of seakeeping hull forms,” in Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Craft, London, 1999.10.3940/rina.hs.1999.04Search in Google Scholar

24. A. Molland and D. Taunton, “Methods for assessing the seakeeping performance of competing high speed vessel designs,” in Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Craft, London, 1999.10.3940/rina.hs.1999.11Search in Google Scholar

25. N. Salvesen, O. Tuck, and O. Faltinsen, “Ship motions and sea loads,” Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, No. 78, pp. 250-287, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

26. K. Niklas, “Supporting development of the smart ship technology by CFD simulation of ship behavior in close to real operational conditions,” in Maritime Transportation and Harvesting of Sea Resources, Guedes Soares & Teixeira, Red., London, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018, pp. 535-540, ISBN 978-0-8153-7993-5.Search in Google Scholar

27. T. Kolanek, J. Stęszewski, and J. Jarosz, “Record of experimental determination of vessel’s centre of gravity position” (in Polish), Navicentrum sp. z o.o., Wrocław, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

28. J. KEUNING, “EP 2 038 167 B1”. France 2010.Search in Google Scholar

29. Ulstein Design AS, “A Foreship Arrangement for a Vessel of the Deplacement Type”. 2006.Search in Google Scholar

30. J. Keuning and J. Pinkster, “Optimisation of the seakeeping behaviour of a fast monohull,” in FAST’95 Third Int. Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Lubeck, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

31. T. Bunnik, E. Daalen, G. Kapsenberg, Y. Shin, R. Huijsmans, G. Deng, G. Delhommeau, M. Kashiwagi, and B. Beck, “A comparative study on state-of-art prediction tools for seakeeping,” in 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, California, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

32. P. Sclavounos, D. Kring, Y. Huang, D. Mantzaris, S. Kim and Y. Kim, “A computational method as an advanced tool of ship hydrodynamic design,” Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, No. 105, pp. 375-397, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

33. T. Havelock, “Drifting Force on a Ship among Waves,” Philosophical Magazine, No. 33, 1942.10.1080/14786444208521213Search in Google Scholar

34. J. Holtrop, “Statistical analysis of performance test results”, Vol.24, No. 270, 1977.10.3233/ISP-1977-2427001Search in Google Scholar

35. J. Holtrop and G. Mennen, “An approximate power prediction method”, 1982.10.3233/ISP-1982-2933501Search in Google Scholar

36. ISO 2631-3:1985, Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration – Part 3: Evaluation of exposure to whole-body z-axis vertical vibration in the frequency range 0,1 to 0,63 Hz, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

37. BS 6841:1987, Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

38. F. Spiess, “Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP) Progress – An Observer’s Report,” Office of Naval Research London, London, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

39. J. Michalski, Principles of ship design theory (in Polish), Gdansk: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

40. ITTC, “Recommended Procedures and Guidelines – Resistance Test – 7.5-02-02-01”, ITTC, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

41. ITTC, “Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: 7.5-02-02-02 General Guideline for Uncertainty Analysis in Resistance Tests”, ITTC, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

42. C. Prohaska, “A simple method for the evaluation of the form factor and the low speed wave resistance”, in Proceedings of the 11th International Towing Tank Conference, ITTC’66, Tokyo, 1966.Search in Google Scholar

43. K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, “Full-scale CFD simulations for the determination of ship resistance as a rational alternative method to towing tank experiments,” Ocean Engineering, 2019, doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106435.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106435Search in Google Scholar

44. A. Papanikolaou, Ship Design, Methodologies of Preliminary Design, London: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-94-017-8751-2Search in Google Scholar

45. L. Larsson, F. Stern, and M. Visonneau, Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-94-007-7189-5Search in Google Scholar

46. IMO, “Guidelines for voluntary use of the ship energy efficiency operational indicator (EEOI),” IMO, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

47. PRS, Publication No 103/P – Recommendations concerning energy efficiency of vessels (in Polish), PRS, Gdansk, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

48. J. Holtrop, “A statistical resistance prediction method with a speed dependent form factor,” in SMMSH’88, Varna, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

49. J. Gerritsma, Ship motions in longitudinal waves. TNO Report No. 35S, Netherlands Research Centre TNO for Shipbuilding and Navigation, Delft, 1960.Search in Google Scholar

50. J. Gerritsma, W. Beukelman, Comparison of calculated and measured heaving and pitching motions of a Series 60, CB = 0.70, ship model in regular longitudinal waves. Report No. 142, Netherlands Ship Research Centre, Delft, 1966.Search in Google Scholar

51. J.M.J. Journée, Verification and Validation of Ship Motions Program SEAWAY, Delft University of Technology Shiphydromechanics Laboratory Report1213a, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

52. Henryk Olszewski and H. Ghaemi. New Concept of Numerical Ship Motion Modelling for Total Ship Operability Analysis by Integrating Ship and Environment Under One Overall System, Polish Maritime Research. 2018, Volume 25: Issue s1, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0020.10.2478/pomr-2018-0020Search in Google Scholar

53. Zhiquan Liu. Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Ship Autopilot with Speed Keeping. Polish Maritime Research. 2018, Volume 25: Issue 4, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0128.10.2478/pomr-2018-0128Search in Google Scholar

54. Kaiye Hu, Yong Ding, and Hongwei Wang High-Speed Catamaran’s Longitudinal Motion Attenuation with Active Hydrofoils, Polish Maritime Research, 2018, Volume 25: Issue s2, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0074.10.2478/pomr-2018-0074Search in Google Scholar

55. Ang Li and Yunbo Li. Numerical and Experimental Study on Seakeeping Performance of a High-Speed Trimaran with T-foil in Head Waves, Polish Maritime Research, 2019, Volume 26: Issue 3, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0047.10.2478/pomr-2019-0047Search in Google Scholar

56. W. Litwin, W. Leśniewski, D. Piątek, and K. Niklas, “Experimental Research on the Energy Efficiency of a Parallel Hybrid Drive for an Inland Ship,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1675, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12091675.10.3390/en12091675Search in Google Scholar