[1. J. Dudziak, Theory of ships (in Polish), Gdansk: Fundacja Promocji Przemysłu Okrętowego i Gospodarki Morskiej, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. “The Nordic Cooperative Project: “Seakeeping Performance of Ship”, Assessment of Ship Performance in a Seaway, Marintek,” Norway, Trondheim, 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. T. Cepowski, Modelling of seakeeping qualities of open-top container carriers in the preliminary design phase. Polish Maritime Research 2(69) 2011 Vol 18; pp. 19-2710.2478/v10012-011-0008-9]Search in Google Scholar
[4. K. Sarioz and E. Narli, “Effect of criteria on seakeeping performance assessment,” Ocean Engineering, p. 116101173, 25 02 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. I. Mudronja, P. Vidan, and J. Parunov, “Review of seakeeping criteria for container ship sustainable speed calculation in rough weather,” Maritime Technology and Engineering, pp. 1059-1064, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. B. Abeil, “Seakeeping Aspects in the Design of Survey Vessels,” in ICSOT: Developments in Ship Design & Construction, Ambon, 2012.10.3940/rina.icsotin.2012.17]Search in Google Scholar
[7. NATO, “NATO STANAG 4154, Common Procedures for Seakeeping in the Ship Design Process,” 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Bentley Systems, Motions Program & User Manual, Bentley Systems, 2016.10.1136/bmj.i5173]Search in Google Scholar
[9. ABS, Guide for passenger comfort on ship, Houston: American Bureau of Shipping, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. DNV, Rules for Classification of Ships - Special Service and Type additional Class, Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. LR, Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships, United Kingdom: Lloyd’s Register, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. PRS, Publication No. 32/P – Requirements for Cargo Distribution and Fastening on Sea-going Vessels (in Polish), Gdansk: Polish Register of Shipping, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. IMO, MEPC.1/CIrc.850/rev.1, 15 July 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. IMO, MSC.1/Circ.1228, 11 January 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. IMO, “Resolution MEPC.308(73) – Annex 5 – Guidelines on the method of calculation of the attained energy efficiency design index (EEDI) for new ships,” 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. J. Gelling, “The Axe Bow: The Shape of Ships to Come,” in 19th International HISWA Symposium on Yacht Design and Yacht Construction, Amsterdam, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. J. L. Gelling and J. A. Keuning, “Recent Developments in the Design of Fast Ships,” HISWA International Symposium on Yacht Design & Construction, Vol. 5, July, pp. 57-68, 2010.10.25043/19098642.51]Search in Google Scholar
[18. J. Keuning, J. Pinkster, and F. van Walree, “Further Investigation into the Hydrodynamic Performance of the AXE Bow Concept,” in Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on High Speed, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. A. R. J. M. Lloyd, Lloyd, Seakeeping – ship behaviour in rough weather, A R J M Lloyds, 26 Sprithead Avenue, Gosport, United Kingdom, 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Ulstein, “X-BOW – how it started,” 18 August, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ulstein.com/innovations/x-bow. [Date of access: 25 November 2018].]Search in Google Scholar
[21. K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, “Full scale CFD seakeeping simulations for case study ship redesigned from V-shaped bulbous bow to X-bow hull form,” Applied Ocean Research, pp. 188-201, 2019, doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.011.10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.011]Search in Google Scholar
[22. J. K. White, “PhD Thesis: Numerical and experimental investigation of the effect of an inverted bow on the hydrodynamic performance of Navy combatant hull forms,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015.10.5957/WMTC-2015-038]Search in Google Scholar
[23. S. Hunt, “Comparison of experimental and analytical methods for optimization of seakeeping hull forms,” in Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Craft, London, 1999.10.3940/rina.hs.1999.04]Search in Google Scholar
[24. A. Molland and D. Taunton, “Methods for assessing the seakeeping performance of competing high speed vessel designs,” in Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Craft, London, 1999.10.3940/rina.hs.1999.11]Search in Google Scholar
[25. N. Salvesen, O. Tuck, and O. Faltinsen, “Ship motions and sea loads,” Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, No. 78, pp. 250-287, 1970.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. K. Niklas, “Supporting development of the smart ship technology by CFD simulation of ship behavior in close to real operational conditions,” in Maritime Transportation and Harvesting of Sea Resources, Guedes Soares & Teixeira, Red., London, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018, pp. 535-540, ISBN 978-0-8153-7993-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. T. Kolanek, J. Stęszewski, and J. Jarosz, “Record of experimental determination of vessel’s centre of gravity position” (in Polish), Navicentrum sp. z o.o., Wrocław, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. J. KEUNING, “EP 2 038 167 B1”. France 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Ulstein Design AS, “A Foreship Arrangement for a Vessel of the Deplacement Type”. 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. J. Keuning and J. Pinkster, “Optimisation of the seakeeping behaviour of a fast monohull,” in FAST’95 Third Int. Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Lubeck, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. T. Bunnik, E. Daalen, G. Kapsenberg, Y. Shin, R. Huijsmans, G. Deng, G. Delhommeau, M. Kashiwagi, and B. Beck, “A comparative study on state-of-art prediction tools for seakeeping,” in 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, California, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. P. Sclavounos, D. Kring, Y. Huang, D. Mantzaris, S. Kim and Y. Kim, “A computational method as an advanced tool of ship hydrodynamic design,” Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, No. 105, pp. 375-397, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. T. Havelock, “Drifting Force on a Ship among Waves,” Philosophical Magazine, No. 33, 1942.10.1080/14786444208521213]Search in Google Scholar
[34. J. Holtrop, “Statistical analysis of performance test results”, Vol.24, No. 270, 1977.10.3233/ISP-1977-2427001]Search in Google Scholar
[35. J. Holtrop and G. Mennen, “An approximate power prediction method”, 1982.10.3233/ISP-1982-2933501]Search in Google Scholar
[36. ISO 2631-3:1985, Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration – Part 3: Evaluation of exposure to whole-body z-axis vertical vibration in the frequency range 0,1 to 0,63 Hz, 1985.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. BS 6841:1987, Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock, 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. F. Spiess, “Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP) Progress – An Observer’s Report,” Office of Naval Research London, London, 1975.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. J. Michalski, Principles of ship design theory (in Polish), Gdansk: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. ITTC, “Recommended Procedures and Guidelines – Resistance Test – 7.5-02-02-01”, ITTC, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. ITTC, “Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: 7.5-02-02-02 General Guideline for Uncertainty Analysis in Resistance Tests”, ITTC, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. C. Prohaska, “A simple method for the evaluation of the form factor and the low speed wave resistance”, in Proceedings of the 11th International Towing Tank Conference, ITTC’66, Tokyo, 1966.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, “Full-scale CFD simulations for the determination of ship resistance as a rational alternative method to towing tank experiments,” Ocean Engineering, 2019, doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106435.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106435]Search in Google Scholar
[44. A. Papanikolaou, Ship Design, Methodologies of Preliminary Design, London: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-94-017-8751-2]Search in Google Scholar
[45. L. Larsson, F. Stern, and M. Visonneau, Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-94-007-7189-5]Search in Google Scholar
[46. IMO, “Guidelines for voluntary use of the ship energy efficiency operational indicator (EEOI),” IMO, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. PRS, Publication No 103/P – Recommendations concerning energy efficiency of vessels (in Polish), PRS, Gdansk, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. J. Holtrop, “A statistical resistance prediction method with a speed dependent form factor,” in SMMSH’88, Varna, 1988.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. J. Gerritsma, Ship motions in longitudinal waves. TNO Report No. 35S, Netherlands Research Centre TNO for Shipbuilding and Navigation, Delft, 1960.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. J. Gerritsma, W. Beukelman, Comparison of calculated and measured heaving and pitching motions of a Series 60, CB = 0.70, ship model in regular longitudinal waves. Report No. 142, Netherlands Ship Research Centre, Delft, 1966.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. J.M.J. Journée, Verification and Validation of Ship Motions Program SEAWAY, Delft University of Technology Shiphydromechanics Laboratory Report1213a, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Henryk Olszewski and H. Ghaemi. New Concept of Numerical Ship Motion Modelling for Total Ship Operability Analysis by Integrating Ship and Environment Under One Overall System, Polish Maritime Research. 2018, Volume 25: Issue s1, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0020.10.2478/pomr-2018-0020]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Zhiquan Liu. Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Ship Autopilot with Speed Keeping. Polish Maritime Research. 2018, Volume 25: Issue 4, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0128.10.2478/pomr-2018-0128]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Kaiye Hu, Yong Ding, and Hongwei Wang High-Speed Catamaran’s Longitudinal Motion Attenuation with Active Hydrofoils, Polish Maritime Research, 2018, Volume 25: Issue s2, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0074.10.2478/pomr-2018-0074]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Ang Li and Yunbo Li. Numerical and Experimental Study on Seakeeping Performance of a High-Speed Trimaran with T-foil in Head Waves, Polish Maritime Research, 2019, Volume 26: Issue 3, doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0047.10.2478/pomr-2019-0047]Search in Google Scholar
[56. W. Litwin, W. Leśniewski, D. Piątek, and K. Niklas, “Experimental Research on the Energy Efficiency of a Parallel Hybrid Drive for an Inland Ship,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1675, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12091675.10.3390/en12091675]Search in Google Scholar