Accès libre

How to Warranty the Sustainability of a Company’s Digital Transformation Base on the Case of Chi Forest

 et    | 03 juil. 2024
À propos de cet article

Citez

Andriushchenko, K., Buriachenko, A., Rozhko, O., Lavruk, O., Skok, P., Hlushchenko, Y., Muzychka, Y., Slavina, N., Buchynska, O., & Kondarevych, V. (2020). Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2255–2270. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(53) Search in Google Scholar

Ardito, L., Raby, S., Albino, V., & Bertoldi, B. (2021). The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 123, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.022 Search in Google Scholar

Ettlie, J. E., & Pavlou, P. A. (2006). Technology-Based New Product Development Partnerships*. Decision Sciences, 37(2), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2006.00119.x Search in Google Scholar

Donmoyer, R. (2000). Generalizability and the single-case study. Case study method: Key issues, key texts, 45-68. Search in Google Scholar

Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284-300. Search in Google Scholar

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425 Search in Google Scholar

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 Search in Google Scholar

Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003 Search in Google Scholar

Gurbaxani, V., & Dunkle, D. (2019). Gearing Up For Successful Digital Transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00017 Search in Google Scholar

Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 Search in Google Scholar

Macher, J. T., & Mowery, D. C. (2009). Measuring Dynamic Capabilities: Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing. British Journal of Management, 20, S41–S62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00612.x Search in Google Scholar

Paiola, M., Schiavone, F., Grandinetti, R., & Chen, J. (2021). Digital servitization and sustainability through networking: Some evidences from IoT-based business models. Journal of Business Research, 132, 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.047 Search in Google Scholar

Šimberová, I., Korauš, A., Schüller, D., Smolíkova, L., Straková, J., & Váchal, J. (2022). Threats and Opportunities in Digital Transformation in SMEs from the Perspective of Sustainability: A Case Study in the Czech Republic. Sustainability, 14(6), 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063628 Search in Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2558-9652
Langue:
Anglais