Uneingeschränkter Zugang

How to Warranty the Sustainability of a Company’s Digital Transformation Base on the Case of Chi Forest

 und   
03. Juli 2024

Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN

Andriushchenko, K., Buriachenko, A., Rozhko, O., Lavruk, O., Skok, P., Hlushchenko, Y., Muzychka, Y., Slavina, N., Buchynska, O., & Kondarevych, V. (2020). Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2255–2270. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(53) Search in Google Scholar

Ardito, L., Raby, S., Albino, V., & Bertoldi, B. (2021). The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 123, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.022 Search in Google Scholar

Ettlie, J. E., & Pavlou, P. A. (2006). Technology-Based New Product Development Partnerships*. Decision Sciences, 37(2), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2006.00119.x Search in Google Scholar

Donmoyer, R. (2000). Generalizability and the single-case study. Case study method: Key issues, key texts, 45-68. Search in Google Scholar

Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284-300. Search in Google Scholar

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425 Search in Google Scholar

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 Search in Google Scholar

Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003 Search in Google Scholar

Gurbaxani, V., & Dunkle, D. (2019). Gearing Up For Successful Digital Transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00017 Search in Google Scholar

Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 Search in Google Scholar

Macher, J. T., & Mowery, D. C. (2009). Measuring Dynamic Capabilities: Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing. British Journal of Management, 20, S41–S62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00612.x Search in Google Scholar

Paiola, M., Schiavone, F., Grandinetti, R., & Chen, J. (2021). Digital servitization and sustainability through networking: Some evidences from IoT-based business models. Journal of Business Research, 132, 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.047 Search in Google Scholar

Šimberová, I., Korauš, A., Schüller, D., Smolíkova, L., Straková, J., & Váchal, J. (2022). Threats and Opportunities in Digital Transformation in SMEs from the Perspective of Sustainability: A Case Study in the Czech Republic. Sustainability, 14(6), 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063628 Search in Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 Search in Google Scholar