<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in the midst of a larger question of apologetic methodology, primarily, between presuppositionalists and evidentialists. This article continues to address the two cross-currents by offering a Henrecian evaluation of Michael Licona’s new historiographical approach to defending the resurrection. In particular, the article attempts to evaluate Licona’s evidentialist approach through the lens of Henry’s presuppositional approach.</p></abstract>

Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in the midst of a larger question of apologetic methodology, primarily, between presuppositionalists and evidentialists. This article continues to address the two cross-currents by offering a Henrecian evaluation of Michael Licona’s new historiographical approach to defending the resurrection. In particular, the article attempts to evaluate Licona’s evidentialist approach through the lens of Henry’s presuppositional approach.

Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s <italic>New Historiographical Approach</italic>

Perichoresis

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s 

Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean...

Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach

Publié en ligne: 08 août 2019

Pages: 43 - 61

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0021

Mots clés
Carl F. H. Henry, Michael R. Licona, presuppositionalism, evidentialism, methodology

© 2019 William C. Roach, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach

Publié en ligne: 08 août 2019

Pages: 43 - 61

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0021

Mots clésCarl F. H. Henry, Michael R. Licona, presuppositionalism, evidentialism, methodology

© 2019 William C. Roach, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Mots clés
Carl F. H. Henry, Michael R. Licona, presuppositionalism, evidentialism, methodology