This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ádám, B. Á. & Sebestyén, Z. (2023). Comparison of OEE-based manufacturing productivity metrics. In: Creative Construction Conference 2023, pp. 432–439.ÁdámB. Á.SebestyénZ. (2023). Comparison of OEE-based manufacturing productivity metrics. In: Creative Construction Conference 2023, pp. 432–439.Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed, M. H. (2013). OEE can be your key. Industrial Engineer, 45(8), pp. 43–48.AhmedM. H. (2013). OEE can be your key. Industrial Engineer, 45(8), pp. 43–48.Search in Google Scholar
Árva, G., Tóth, Z. E., Jónás, T., & Surman, V. (2019). Will the Likert scale pass the final exam? A novel, fuzzy-number-based evaluation of supervisors’ performance. Proceedings of Feb Zagreb 10th International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business, 1(1), pp. 300–316.ÁrvaG.TóthZ. E.JónásT.SurmanV. (2019). Will the Likert scale pass the final exam? A novel, fuzzy-number-based evaluation of supervisors’ performance. Proceedings of Feb Zagreb 10th International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business, 1(1), pp. 300–316.Search in Google Scholar
Ashkanani, S., & Franzoi, R. (2022). An overview on megaproject management systems. Management Matters, 19(2), pp. 129–148.AshkananiS.FranzoiR. (2022). An overview on megaproject management systems. Management Matters, 19(2), pp. 129–148.Search in Google Scholar
Association for Project Management (APM). (2012). APM Body of Knowledge – Definitions (Association for Project Management), 7th edn. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire.Association for Project Management (APM). (2012). APM Body of Knowledge – Definitions (Association for Project Management), 7th edn. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire.Search in Google Scholar
Association for Project Management (APM). (2019). APM – A CostE Estimating Guide. Association for Project Management. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire.Association for Project Management (APM). (2019). APM – A CostE Estimating Guide. Association for Project Management. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire.Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), pp. 337–342.AtkinsonR. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), pp. 337–342.Search in Google Scholar
Badewi, A. (2016). The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), pp. 761–778.BadewiA. (2016). The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), pp. 761–778.Search in Google Scholar
Baker, B. N., Murphy, D. C. & Fisher, D. (1997). Factors affecting project success. In Cleland, D. I. & King, W. R. (Ed.), Project Management Handbook, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 902–919.BakerB. N.MurphyD. C.FisherD. (1997). Factors affecting project success. In ClelandD. I.KingW. R. (Ed.), Project Management Handbook, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 902–919.Search in Google Scholar
Basu, R. (2014). Managing quality in projects: An empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), pp. 178–187.BasuR. (2014). Managing quality in projects: An empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), pp. 178–187.Search in Google Scholar
Blaskovics, B. (2014). Impact of leadership styles on project success – The case of a multinational company. Dynamic Relationships Management Journal, 3(2), pp. 21–36.BlaskovicsB. (2014). Impact of leadership styles on project success – The case of a multinational company. Dynamic Relationships Management Journal, 3(2), pp. 21–36.Search in Google Scholar
Cerchiello, P., & Giudici, P. (2012). An integrated statistical model to measure academic teaching quality. Open Journal of Statistics, 2(5), pp. 491–497.CerchielloP.GiudiciP. (2012). An integrated statistical model to measure academic teaching quality. Open Journal of Statistics, 2(5), pp. 491–497.Search in Google Scholar
Chan, A. P. C., Scott, D., & Lam, E. W. M. (2002). Framework of success criteria for design/build projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), pp. 120–128.ChanA. P. C.ScottD.LamE. W. M. (2002). Framework of success criteria for design/build projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), pp. 120–128.Search in Google Scholar
Cserháti, G., & Szabó, L. (2014). The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organisational event projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), pp. 613–624.CserhátiG.SzabóL. (2014). The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organisational event projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), pp. 613–624.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), pp. 189–201.DavisK. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), pp. 189–201.Search in Google Scholar
Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), pp. 89–95.DvirD.RazT.ShenharA. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), pp. 89–95.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, M. A., & Beale, P. (1992). Measuring project success. Project Management Journal, 23(1), pp. 8–17.FreemanM. A.BealeP. (1992). Measuring project success. Project Management Journal, 23(1), pp. 8–17.Search in Google Scholar
Galjanić, K., Marović, I., & Hanak, T. (2023). Performance measurement framework for prediction and management of construction investments. Sustainability, 15(18), p. 13617.GaljanićK.MarovićI.HanakT. (2023). Performance measurement framework for prediction and management of construction investments. Sustainability, 15(18), p. 13617.Search in Google Scholar
Hajdu, M., & Isaac, S. (2016), Sixty years of project planning: history and future, Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 8(1), pp. 1499–1510.HajduM.IsaacS. (2016), Sixty years of project planning: history and future, Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 8(1), pp. 1499–1510.Search in Google Scholar
Holt, G. D. (2014). Asking questions, analysing answers: Relative importance revisited. Construction Innovation, 14(1), pp. 2–16.HoltG. D. (2014). Asking questions, analysing answers: Relative importance revisited. Construction Innovation, 14(1), pp. 2–16.Search in Google Scholar
Ilić, I., & Veličković, V. M. (2019). A process of project quality improvement. Filomat, 33(6), pp. 1833–1844.IlićI.VeličkovićV. M. (2019). A process of project quality improvement. Filomat, 33(6), pp. 1833–1844.Search in Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015a). ISO 9000:2015 Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015a). ISO 9000:2015 Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015b). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015b). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2021). ISO 21500:2021, Project, Programme and Portfolio Management — Context and Concepts. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2021). ISO 21500:2021, Project, Programme and Portfolio Management — Context and Concepts. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar
International Project Management Association (IPMA). (2015). Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme & Portfolio Management, 4th edn. International Project Management Association, Zurich, Switzerland.International Project Management Association (IPMA). (2015). Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme & Portfolio Management, 4th edn. International Project Management Association, Zurich, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar
Jaqin, C., Rozak, A., & Hardi Purba, H. (2020). Case study in increasing overall equipment effectiveness on progressive press machine using plan-do-check-act cycle. International Journal of Engineering, 33(11), pp. 2245–2251.JaqinC.RozakA.Hardi PurbaH. (2020). Case study in increasing overall equipment effectiveness on progressive press machine using plan-do-check-act cycle. International Journal of Engineering, 33(11), pp. 2245–2251.Search in Google Scholar
Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1998). Juran’s Quality Handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York, USA.JuranJ. M.GodfreyA. B. (1998). Juran’s Quality Handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York, USA.Search in Google Scholar
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 10th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.KerznerH. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 10th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.Search in Google Scholar
Kumar, V., Pandey, A., & Singh, R. (2023). Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: Project practitioners’ perspectives. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 15(1), pp. 1–22.KumarV.PandeyA.SinghR. (2023). Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: Project practitioners’ perspectives. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 15(1), pp. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenzini, E., & Cerchiello, P. (2013). Measuring the success factors of a website: Statistical methods and an application to a “Web District”. In: Benedetti, A. & Di Ciaccio, A. (Ed.), Statistical Models for Data Analysis, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 201–208.LorenziniE.CerchielloP. (2013). Measuring the success factors of a website: Statistical methods and an application to a “Web District”. In: BenedettiA.Di CiaccioA. (Ed.), Statistical Models for Data Analysis, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 201–208.Search in Google Scholar
Moorthy, A. K., Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2011). Visual perception and quality assessment. In: Gonzalez, R. C. & Woods, R. E. (Ed.), Optical and Digital Image Processing: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, pp. 419–439.MoorthyA. K.WangZ.BovikA. C. (2011). Visual perception and quality assessment. In: GonzalezR. C.WoodsR. E. (Ed.), Optical and Digital Image Processing: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, pp. 419–439.Search in Google Scholar
Morris, R. A., & Sember, B. M. (2008). Project Management that Works: Real-World Advice on Communicating, Problem-Solving, and Everything Else you Need to Know to Get the Job Do. AMACOM, New York, USA.MorrisR. A.SemberB. M. (2008). Project Management that Works: Real-World Advice on Communicating, Problem-Solving, and Everything Else you Need to Know to Get the Job Do. AMACOM, New York, USA.Search in Google Scholar
Mussini, M. (2018). On measuring polarization for ordinal data: An approach based on the decomposition of the LetI Index. Statistics in Transition New Series, 19(2), pp. 277–296.MussiniM. (2018). On measuring polarization for ordinal data: An approach based on the decomposition of the LetI Index. Statistics in Transition New Series, 19(2), pp. 277–296.Search in Google Scholar
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5) pp 625–632NormanG. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5) pp 625–632Search in Google Scholar
Pinto, J. K. (2016). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage, 4th edn. Pearson, United States of America.PintoJ. K. (2016). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage, 4th edn. Pearson, United States of America.Search in Google Scholar
Pollack, J., Helm, J., & Adler, D. (2018). What is the iron triangle, and how has it changed? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), pp. 527–547.PollackJ.HelmJ.AdlerD. (2018). What is the iron triangle, and how has it changed?International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), pp. 527–547.Search in Google Scholar
Ponkanti, B. R., & Madoun, M. (2015). An approach to bridging the gap between quality, value and services marketing. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer. pp. 60–60.PonkantiB. R.MadounM. (2015). An approach to bridging the gap between quality, value and services marketing. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer. pp. 60–60.Search in Google Scholar
Project Management Institute. (2017). Project Management Book of Knowledge, 6th edn. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA.Project Management Institute. (2017). Project Management Book of Knowledge, 6th edn. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA.Search in Google Scholar
Sebestyen, Z. (2017). Further considerations in project success. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 571–577.SebestyenZ. (2017). Further considerations in project success. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 571–577.Search in Google Scholar
Sebestyén, Z., Erdei, J., & Alfreahat, D. (2022). Impact of methodologies and standards on the owner’s economic benefit in projects. Heliyon, 8(2), p. e08843.SebestyénZ.ErdeiJ.AlfreahatD. (2022). Impact of methodologies and standards on the owner’s economic benefit in projects. Heliyon, 8(2), p. e08843.Search in Google Scholar
Sebestyén, Z., Erdei, J., & Hajdu, M. (2023). A fundamental overview of the concept of quality in project management. In: Creative Construction Conference 2023, pp. 720–724.SebestyénZ.ErdeiJ.HajduM. (2023). A fundamental overview of the concept of quality in project management. In: Creative Construction Conference 2023, pp. 720–724.Search in Google Scholar
Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA, USA.ShenharA. J.DvirD. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA, USA.Search in Google Scholar
Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), pp. 699–725.ShenharA. J.DvirD.LevyO.MaltzA. C. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), pp. 699–725.Search in Google Scholar
The Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2009). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office, UK.The Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2009). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, J. R., Anbari, F., & Bredillet, C. (2013). Perspectives on research in project management: The nine schools. Global Business Perspectives, 1(1), pp. 3–28.TurnerJ. R.AnbariF.BredilletC. (2013). Perspectives on research in project management: The nine schools. Global Business Perspectives, 1(1), pp. 3–28.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), pp. 87–99.TurnerR.ZolinR. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), pp. 87–99.Search in Google Scholar
Van Wyngaard, C. J., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Pretorius, L. (2012). Theory of the triple constraint – A conceptual review. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1991–1997.Van WyngaardC. J.PretoriusJ. H. C.PretoriusL. (2012). Theory of the triple constraint – A conceptual review. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1991–1997.Search in Google Scholar
Van Wyngaard, C. J., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Pretorius, L. (2013). Deliberating the triple constraint trade-offs as polarities to manage – A refreshed perspective. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1265–1272.Van WyngaardC. J.PretoriusJ. H. C.PretoriusL. (2013). Deliberating the triple constraint trade-offs as polarities to manage – A refreshed perspective. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1265–1272.Search in Google Scholar
Vargha, A. (2002). Független minták összehasonlítása új rangso-rolásos eljárásokkal. Statisztikai Szemle, 80(4), pp. 328–353.VarghaA. (2002). Független minták összehasonlítása új rangso-rolásos eljárásokkal. Statisztikai Szemle, 80(4), pp. 328–353.Search in Google Scholar
Vijayabanu, C., Karthikeyan, S., & Vijay Surya, P. (2022). Total quality management practices and its impact on Indian construction projects. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 14(1), pp. 2697–2709.VijayabanuC.KarthikeyanS.Vijay SuryaP. (2022). Total quality management practices and its impact on Indian construction projects. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 14(1), pp. 2697–2709.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, P., Ashill, N. J., Naumann, E., & Jackson, E. (2015). Relationship quality and satisfaction: Customer-perceived success factors for on-time projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), pp. 1836–1850.WilliamsP.AshillN. J.NaumannE.JacksonE. (2015). Relationship quality and satisfaction: Customer-perceived success factors for on-time projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), pp. 1836–1850.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, J. N. (1997). Time and budget: The twin imperatives of a project sponsor. International Journal of Project Management, 15(3), pp. 181–186.WrightJ. N. (1997). Time and budget: The twin imperatives of a project sponsor. International Journal of Project Management, 15(3), pp. 181–186.Search in Google Scholar