Uncovering the hidden gem: The role of the undervalued quality in projects
, et
14 août 2024
À propos de cet article
Catégorie d'article: Research Paper
Publié en ligne: 14 août 2024
Pages: 224 - 236
Reçu: 05 sept. 2023
Accepté: 21 mai 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2024-0015
Mots clés
© 2024 János Erdei et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1:
Fig. 2:
Fig. 3:
Descriptive statistics about organisations
| Category | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|
| Micro (1–9 employees) | 8.47 |
| Small (10–49 employees) | 18.36 |
| Mid-size (50–249 employees) | 20.62 |
| Large (250+ employees) | 51.13 |
| |
1.41 |
| <$1 million | 13.28 |
| $1+ million – $10 million | 13.56 |
| $10+ million – $50 million | 10.73 |
| $50+ million – $1 billion | 12.71 |
| >$1 billion | 22.60 |
| |
27.12 |
| Private sector | 58.20 |
| Public sector | 22.03 |
| |
14.69 |
| |
5.10 |
| Communication services | 3.67 |
| Consumer discretionary | 15.54 |
| Consumer staples | 3.96 |
| Energy + other sector (health care, | 9.63 |
| industrials etc.) | 5.93 |
| Financials | 10.17 |
| Health care | 14.41 |
| Industrials | 17.23 |
| Information technology | 4.00 |
| Materials + other sector (health care, industrials etc.) | 3.68 |
| 11.78 | |
| Real Estate + other sector | |
| Other and |
|
Distribution of PUI values
| Total no. of projects | Economic benefit Q6 = ‘Yes’ | No economic benefit Q6 = ‘No’ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Percent | Count | Percent | Count | Percent | |
| 3 | 5 | 1.41 | 1 | 0.54 | 4 | 3.28 |
| 4 | 13 | 3.67 | 6 | 3.26 | 6 | 4.92 |
| 5 | 29 | 8.19 | 11 | 5.98 | 13 | 10.66 |
| 6 | 68 | 19.21 | 30 | 16.30 | 30 | 24.59 |
| 7 | 113 | 31.92 | 60 | 32.61 | 36 | 29.51 |
| 8 | 60 | 16.95 | 42 | 22.83 | 12 | 9.84 |
| 9 | 31 | 8.76 | 19 | 10.33 | 8 | 6.56 |
| 10 | 10 | 2.82 | 4 | 2.17 | 5 | 4.10 |
| 11 | 1 | 0.28 | 1 | 0.54 | – | – |
| Missing | 24 | 6.78 | 10 | 5.43 | 8 | 6.56 |
Descriptive statistics about projects
| Category | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|
| Micro (1–9 employees) | 39.83 |
| Small (10–49 employees) | 45.20 |
| Mid-size (50–249 employees) | 9.04 |
| Large (250+ employees) | 4.24 |
| |
1.69 |
| <2.0 years | 52.55 |
| 2.0–4.9 years | 29.67 |
| 5.0–8.0 years | 11.30 |
| >8.0 years | 6.48 |
| <$1 million | 47.18 |
| $1+ million – $10 million | 20.33 |
| $10+ million – $50 million | 7.63 |
| $50+ million – $1 billion | 3.11 |
| >$1 billion | 0.56 |
| |
21.19 |
| Customer/user | 5.08 |
| Project management team member | 13.28 |
| Project manager | 19.21 |
| Project sponsor/Owner | 3.11 |
| Project team member | 38.98 |
| Team manager | 7.91 |
| Other + |
12.43 |
| Yes | 52.00 |
| No | 34.46 |
| |
13.56 |
| Much earlier | 0.28 |
| Earlier | 3.39 |
| On-time | 33.62 |
| Late | 47.74 |
| Much late | 14.41 |
| |
0.56 |
| Much under budget | 0.56 |
| Under budget | 7.63 |
| On budget | 51.98 |
| Over budget | 29.94 |
| Much over budget | 5.65 |
| |
4.24 |
| Better | 18.65 |
| Exactly | 57.06 |
| Imperfectly | 21.75 |
| |
2.54 |
Mann–Whitney U test by variable Q6
| Variable | Rank Sum No | Rank Sum Yes | U | Z | Z adjusted | Valid No | Valid Yes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 16,783.0 | 29,882.0 | 9,402.00 | -2.2953 | 0.0217 | -2.4942 | 0.0126 | 121 | 184 |
| Cost | 17,126.5 | 26,829.5 | 9,986.50 | -0.7541 | 0.4507 | -0.8333 | 0.4046 | 119 | 177 |
| 16,050.5 | 28,799.5 | 9,029.50 | -2.2566 | 0.0240 | -2.5789 | 0.0099 | 118 | 181 | |
Change of indices by Q6
| Numeric label | Time | Cost | Quality | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 1 | 10.87 | 18.18 | 5.08 | 8.40 | 16.58 | 29.66 |
| 2 | 45.65 | 51.24 | 31.64 | 31.09 | 62.98 | 55.93 |
| 3 | 39.13 | 27.27 | 53.11 | 52.94 | 20.44 | 14.41 |
| 4 | 3.81 | 3.31 | 9.60 | 6.73 | – | – |
| 5 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.84 | – | – |
| Median | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 0.524 | 0.424 | 0.573 | 0.571 | 0.735 | 0.715 | |
| 0.656 | 0.711 | 0.578 | 0.599 | 0.481 | 0.577 | |
| 0.390 | 0.393 | 0.378 | 0.394 | 0.602 | 0.664 | |