This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alzober, W., & Yaakub, A. R. (2014). Integrated model for selection the prequalification criteria of contractor. Lecture Notes on Software Engineering, 2(3), p. 233.AlzoberW.YaakubA. R. (2014). Integrated model for selection the prequalification criteria of contractor. , 2(3), p. 233.Search in Google Scholar
Araújo, M., Alencar, L., & Mota, C. (2015). Contractor selection in construction industry: A multicriteria model. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 06-09 December 2015, Singapore, pp. 519–523.AraújoM.AlencarL.MotaC. (2015). . In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 06-09 December 2015, Singapore, pp. 519–523.Search in Google Scholar
Balubaid, M., & Alamoudi, R. (2015). Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to multi-criteria analysis for contractor selection. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5(09), p. 581.BalubaidM.AlamoudiR. (2015). Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to multi-criteria analysis for contractor selection. , 5(09), p. 581.Search in Google Scholar
Doraisamy, S. V., Akasah, Z. A., & Yunus, R. (2015). An overview on the issue of delay in the construction industry. In: InCIEC 2014, pp. 313–319. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-290-6_27.DoraisamyS. V.AkasahZ. A.YunusR. (2015). An overview on the issue of delay in the construction industry. In: , pp. 313–319. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-290-6_27.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
El-khalek, H. A., Aziz, R. F., & Morgan, E. S. (2019). Identification of construction subcontractor prequalification evaluation criteria and their impact on project success. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58, pp. 217–223.El-khalekH. A.AzizR. F.MorganE. S. (2019). Identification of construction subcontractor prequalification evaluation criteria and their impact on project success. , 58, pp. 217–223.Search in Google Scholar
Gransberg, D., Dillon, W. D., Reynolds, L., & Boyd, J. (1999). Quantitative analysis of partnered project performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3), 161–166.GransbergD.DillonW. D.ReynoldsL.BoydJ. (1999). Quantitative analysis of partnered project performance. , 125(3), 161–166.Search in Google Scholar
Hatush, Z., & Skitmore, M. (1997). Criteria for contractor selection. Construction Management & Economics, 15(1), pp. 19–38.HatushZ.SkitmoreM. (1997). Criteria for contractor selection. , 15(1), pp. 19–38.Search in Google Scholar
Ibadov, N. (2015). Contractor selection for construction project, with the use of fuzzy preference relation. Procedia Engineering, 111, pp. 317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.095.IbadovN. (2015). Contractor selection for construction project, with the use of fuzzy preference relation. , 111, pp. 317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.095.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ioannou, P., & Awwad, R. (2010). Below-average bidding method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 136(9), pp. 936–946. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000202.IoannouP.AwwadR. (2010). Below-average bidding method. , 136(9), pp. 936–946. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000202.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lo T. Y., Fung I. W. & Tung K. C. (2006), “Construction delays in Hong Kong civil engineering projects”, Journal of construction engineering and management, 132(6), pp.636–649.LoT. Y.FungI. W.TungK. C. (2006), “Construction delays in Hong Kong civil engineering projects”, , 132(6), pp.636–649.Search in Google Scholar
Kapote, M. M., & Pimplikar, S. S. (2014). Suggested mathematical model for specialized subcontractor prequalification scrutiny and ultimately the performance prediction. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 11(3), pp. 43–51.KapoteM. M.PimplikarS. S. (2014). Suggested mathematical model for specialized subcontractor prequalification scrutiny and ultimately the performance prediction. , 11(3), pp. 43–51.Search in Google Scholar
Kolekar, P. B., & Kanade, G. N. (2014). Contractor selection in construction industry using fuzzy-logic system. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 3(11), pp. 1087–1093.KolekarP. B.KanadeG. N. (2014). Contractor selection in construction industry using fuzzy-logic system. , 3(11), pp. 1087–1093.Search in Google Scholar
Plebankiewicz, E. (2009). Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(4), pp. 377–385.PlebankiewiczE. (2009). Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets. , 15(4), pp. 377–385.Search in Google Scholar
Puri, D., & Tiwari, S. (2014). Evaluating the criteria for contractors’ selection and bid evaluation. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 3(7), pp. 44–48.PuriD.TiwariS. (2014). Evaluating the criteria for contractors’ selection and bid evaluation. , 3(7), pp. 44–48.Search in Google Scholar
Rashvand, P., Abd Majid, M. Z., Baniahmadi, M., & Ghavamirad, F. (2015). Contractor selection at prequalification stage: Current evaluation and shortcomings. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(16), pp. 81–89.RashvandP.Abd MajidM. Z.BaniahmadiM.GhavamiradF. (2015). Contractor selection at prequalification stage: Current evaluation and shortcomings. , 77(16), pp. 81–89.Search in Google Scholar
Waara, F., & Bröchner, J. (2006). Price and nonprice criteria for contractor selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 132(8), p. 797.WaaraF.BröchnerJ. (2006). Price and nonprice criteria for contractor selection. , 132(8), p. 797.Search in Google Scholar
Zailani, S., Ariffin, H., Moeinzadeh, S., & Iranmanesh, M. (2016). The moderating effect of project risk mitigation strategies on the relationship between delay factors and construction project performance. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 7(3), pp. 346–368.ZailaniS.AriffinH.MoeinzadehS.IranmaneshM. (2016). The moderating effect of project risk mitigation strategies on the relationship between delay factors and construction project performance. , 7(3), pp. 346–368.Search in Google Scholar