Accès libre

Maize (Zea mays) reaction in response to rubber rag additive into the soil

Magdalena Marchel

Magdalena Marchel

Institute of Technical Sciences East European State University in PrzemyślPoland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Marchel, Magdalena
, 
Beata Mossety-Leszczak

Beata Mossety-Leszczak

Department of Industrial and Materials Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszow University of TechnologyPoland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Mossety-Leszczak, Beata
 et 
Małgorzata Walczak

Małgorzata Walczak

Department of Industrial and Materials Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszow University of TechnologyPoland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Walczak, Małgorzata
  
31 mars 2020
Maize (Zea mays) reaction in response to rubber rag additive into the soil's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 31 mars 2020
Pages: 1 - 7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2020-0001
Mots clés
© 2020 Magdalena Marchel et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

The yield of roots and aboveground parts of maize [g×pot−1] grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)
The yield of roots and aboveground parts of maize [g×pot−1] grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)

Figure 2

Zinc content [μg×g−1 DM] in roots and aboveground parts of maize grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)
Zinc content [μg×g−1 DM] in roots and aboveground parts of maize grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)

Figure 3

SPAD values in maize leaves grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil); a, b – homogeneous groups (ANOVA and Tuckey's test p < 0.05)
SPAD values in maize leaves grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil); a, b – homogeneous groups (ANOVA and Tuckey's test p < 0.05)

Figure 4

Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves F0, FM, FV grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)
Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves F0, FM, FV grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)

Figure 5

Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves Fv/F0, Fv/FM, grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM)
Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves Fv/F0, Fv/FM, grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM)

The experimental scheme

ObjectRubber rag content in soil [g×kg−1 DM* soil]
0 - control0
I10
II50
III100

Heavy metals’ content in rubber rag [μg×g−1]

NiCdFeCuMnZnPb
1.020.91607.5057.4212.507386.5112.50
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Sciences de la vie, Écologie
RSS Feed de la revue