Acceso abierto

Maize (Zea mays) reaction in response to rubber rag additive into the soil

Magdalena Marchel

Magdalena Marchel

Institute of Technical Sciences East European State University in PrzemyślPoland
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Marchel, Magdalena
, 
Beata Mossety-Leszczak

Beata Mossety-Leszczak

Department of Industrial and Materials Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszow University of TechnologyPoland
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Mossety-Leszczak, Beata
 y 
Małgorzata Walczak

Małgorzata Walczak

Department of Industrial and Materials Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszow University of TechnologyPoland
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Walczak, Małgorzata
  
31 mar 2020
Maize (Zea mays) reaction in response to rubber rag additive into the soil's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Publicado en línea: 31 mar 2020
Páginas: 1 - 7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2020-0001
Palabras clave
© 2020 Magdalena Marchel et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

The yield of roots and aboveground parts of maize [g×pot−1] grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)
The yield of roots and aboveground parts of maize [g×pot−1] grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)

Figure 2

Zinc content [μg×g−1 DM] in roots and aboveground parts of maize grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)
Zinc content [μg×g−1 DM] in roots and aboveground parts of maize grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)

Figure 3

SPAD values in maize leaves grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil); a, b – homogeneous groups (ANOVA and Tuckey's test p < 0.05)
SPAD values in maize leaves grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil); a, b – homogeneous groups (ANOVA and Tuckey's test p < 0.05)

Figure 4

Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves F0, FM, FV grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)
Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves F0, FM, FV grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM soil)

Figure 5

Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves Fv/F0, Fv/FM, grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM)
Radar charts of physiological features of maize leaves Fv/F0, Fv/FM, grown on soil without (0) and with application of rubber rag (10, 50, 100 g×kg−1 DM)

The experimental scheme

ObjectRubber rag content in soil [g×kg−1 DM* soil]
0 - control0
I10
II50
III100

Heavy metals’ content in rubber rag [μg×g−1]

NiCdFeCuMnZnPb
1.020.91607.5057.4212.507386.5112.50
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ciencias de la vida, Ecología
RSS Feed de revista