This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ARTICLE 19. (2016). EU: European Commission’s code of conduct for countering illegal hate speech online and the framework decision. (Legal Analysis). London. https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38430/EU-Code-of-conduct-analysis-FINAL.pdfARTICLE 192016(Legal Analysis). London. https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38430/EU-Code-of-conduct-analysis-FINAL.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M. (2017). Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. UC Davies Law Review 51, 1149.BalkinJ. M.2017Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation51114910.2139/ssrn.3038939Search in Google Scholar
BBC News. (2016). Facebook u-turn over “napalm girl” photograph. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37318040BBC News2016Facebook u-turn over “napalm girl” photographhttps://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37318040Search in Google Scholar
Bickert, M. (2018, April 24). Publishing our internal enforcement guidelines and expanding our appeals process. Facebook News. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/BickertM.2018April24Publishing our internal enforcement guidelines and expanding our appeals processRetrieved January 23, 2020, from https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/Search in Google Scholar
Brown, I. (2010). Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights. Index on Censorship 1, 98–106.BrownI.2010Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights19810610.1177/0306422010362193Search in Google Scholar
BSR (2014). Legitimate and meaningful: Stakeholder engagement in human rights due diligence. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/engaging-with-rights-holdersBSR2014Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/engaging-with-rights-holdersSearch in Google Scholar
Callamard, A. (2019). The human rights obligations of non-state actors. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms (pp. 191–225). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.CallamardA.2019The human rights obligations of non-state actorsInJørgensenR. F.(Ed.),191225Cambridge, MassachusettsMIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Cooke, L. (2007). Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506072163CookeL.2007Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation333360376https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150607216310.1177/0165551506072163Search in Google Scholar
Dangerous Speech Project. (2020). We study dangerous speech and ways to counteract it. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://dangerousspeech.orgDangerous Speech Project2020Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://dangerousspeech.orgSearch in Google Scholar
Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR). (2017). Hadefulde ytringer i den offentlige debat [Hate speech in the online public debate]. (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/media/dokumenter/udgivelser/ligebehandling_2017/rapport_hadefulde_ytringer_online_2017.pdfDanish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR)2017(In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/media/dokumenter/udgivelser/ligebehandling_2017/rapport_hadefulde_ytringer_online_2017.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR). (2019). Demokratisk deltagelse på Facebook [Democratic participation on Facebook]. (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/04_april_19/Rapport%20om%20demokratisk%20deltagelse.pdfDanish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR)2019(In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/04_april_19/Rapport%20om%20demokratisk%20deltagelse.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
DR Medieforskning. (2018). Medieudvikling 2018 [Media development 2018]. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.dr.dk/om-dr/fakta-om-dr/medieforskning/medieudviklingen/2018DR Medieforskning2018Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.dr.dk/om-dr/fakta-om-dr/medieforskning/medieudviklingen/2018Search in Google Scholar
European Parliament, Council of the European Union (EPCO). (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Directive 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/ojEuropean Parliament, Council of the European Union (EPCO)2018https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/ojSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2000). Directive on electronic commerce (2000/31/EC). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0031:en:HTMLEuropean Commission (EC)2000https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0031:en:HTMLSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2016). EU code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online. https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-andxenophobia/countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_enEuropean Commission (EC)2016https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-andxenophobia/countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2017). Tackling illegal content online: Towards an enhanced responsibility of online platforms (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-tackling-illegal-content-online-towards-enhanced-responsibility-online-platformsEuropean Commission (EC)2017(Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-tackling-illegal-content-online-towards-enhanced-responsibility-online-platformsSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2018a). Commission recommendation (EU) 2018/334 of 1 March 2018 on measures to effectively tackle illegal content online (Official Journal of the European Union L63/50). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0334&from=FREuropean Commission (EC)2018a(Official Journal of the European Union L63/50). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0334&from=FRSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). (2018b). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online. COM (2018) 640 final.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:dc0b5b0f-b65f-11e8-99ee-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDFEuropean Commission (EC)2018bhttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:dc0b5b0f-b65f-11e8-99ee-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDFSearch in Google Scholar
European Council. (2008). Council framework decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008F0913&from=ENEuropean Council2008(Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008F0913&from=ENSearch in Google Scholar
Facebook transparency. (2020). Community standards enforcement report. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcementFacebook transparency2020Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcementSearch in Google Scholar
Frydman, B., Hennebel, L., & Lewkowicz, G. (2009). Public strategies for Internet co-regulation in the United States, Europe and China. In E. Brousseau, M. Marzouki, & C. Meadel (Eds.), Governance, regulations and powers on the internet (pp. 133–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.FrydmanB.HennebelL.LewkowiczG.2009Public strategies for Internet co-regulation in the United States, Europe and ChinaInBrousseauE.MarzoukiM.MeadelC.(Eds.),133150CambridgeCambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar
German Law Review. (2017). Network enforcement act. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=1245German Law Review2017Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=1245Search in Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.GillespieT.2018New Haven, ConnecticutYale University PressSearch in Google Scholar
GOV.UK. (2019, April 8). Closed consultation: Online harms white paper. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paperGOV.UK2019April8Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paperSearch in Google Scholar
Hope, C., & McCann, K. (2017, September 19). Google, Facebook and Twitter told to take down terror content within two hours or face fines. The Telegraph.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/19/googlefacebook-twitter-told-take-terror-content-within-two/HopeC.McCannK.2017September19Google, Facebook and Twitter told to take down terror content within two hours or face fineshttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/19/googlefacebook-twitter-told-take-terror-content-within-two/Search in Google Scholar
ICCPR (1966, December 16). International covenant on civil and political rights. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspxICCPR1966December16United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissionerhttps://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspxSearch in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F. (2013). Framing the net: The Internet and human rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.JørgensenR. F.2013Cheltenham, UKEdward Elgar Publishing10.4337/9781782540809Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F. (2017). Framing human rights: Exploring storytelling within internet companies. Information, Communication & Society 21(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289233JørgensenR. F.2017Framing human rights: Exploring storytelling within internet companies213340355https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.128923310.1080/1369118X.2017.1289233Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F. (2018). Human rights and private actors in the online domain. In M. K. Land, & J. D. Aronson (Eds.), New technologies for human rights law and practice (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.JørgensenR. F.2018Human rights and private actors in the online domainInLandM. K.AronsonJ. D.(Eds.),243269CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/9781316838952.011Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F. (Ed.). (2019) Human Rights in the Age of Platforms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.JørgensenR. F.(Ed.).2019Cambridge, MassachusettsMIT Press10.7551/mitpress/11304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F., & Pedersen, A. M. (2017). Online service providers as human rights arbiters. In M. Taddeo, & L. Floridi (Eds.), The responsibilities of online service providers (pp. 179–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.JørgensenR. F.PedersenA. M.2017Online service providers as human rights arbitersInTaddeoM.FloridiL.(Eds.),179199OxfordOxford University Press10.1007/978-3-319-47852-4_10Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F., Pedersen, A. M., Benedek, W., & Nindler, R. (2015, November 30). Case study on ICT and human rights (policies of EU) (Work package no. 2 – deliverable no. 3). European Commission. http://www.fp7-frame.euJørgensenR. F.PedersenA. M.BenedekW.NindlerR.2015November30(Work package no. 2 – deliverable no. 3). European Commission. http://www.fp7-frame.euSearch in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F., Veiberg, C. B., & ten Oever, N. (2019). Exploring the role of HRIA in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector. In N. Götzmann (Ed.), Handbook on human rights impact assessment (pp. 205–218). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.JørgensenR. F.VeibergC. B.ten OeverN.2019Exploring the role of HRIA in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sectorInGötzmannN.(Ed.),205218Cheltenham, UKEdward Elgar Publishing10.4337/9781788970006.00022Search in Google Scholar
Kaye, D. (2016). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. (A/HRC/32/38). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/32/38KayeD.2016(A/HRC/32/38). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/32/38Search in Google Scholar
Kaye, D. (2018). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/HRC/38/35). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/ContentRegulation.aspxKayeD.2018(A/HRC/38/35). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/ContentRegulation.aspxSearch in Google Scholar
Kaye, D., Cannataci, J., & Ní Aoláin, F. (2018, December 7). Mandates of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the special rapporteur on the right to privacy and the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism (Reference: OL OTH 71/2018). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=24234KayeD.CannataciJ.Ní AoláinF.2018December7(Reference: OL OTH 71/2018). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=24234Search in Google Scholar
Keller, D. (2018). Internet platforms: Observations on speech, danger, and money (Aegis series paper no. 1807). A Hoover Institution essay, Stanford University, California. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/files/publication/files/381732092-internet-platforms-observations-on-speech-danger-and-money.pdfKellerD.2018(Aegis series paper no. 1807). A Hoover Institution essay, Stanford University, California. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/files/publication/files/381732092-internet-platforms-observations-on-speech-danger-and-money.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Kerr, A., Musiani, F., & Pohle, J. (2019). Communication and internet policy: A critical rights-based history and future. Internet Policy Review, 8(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3434969KerrA.MusianiF.PohleJ.2019Communication and internet policy: A critical rights-based history and future81https://ssrn.com/abstract=343496910.14763/2019.1.1395Search in Google Scholar
Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598–1670.KlonickK.2018The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech131615981670Search in Google Scholar
Korff, D. (2014). The rule of law on the Internet and in the wider digital world (Issue paper). Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/cybersecurity-capacity/system/files/70114_Rule%20of%20Law%20on%20the%20Internet_web.pdfKorffD.2014(Issue paper). Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/cybersecurity-capacity/system/files/70114_Rule%20of%20Law%20on%20the%20Internet_web.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E. (2015). Regulating speech in cyberspace: Gatekeepers, human rights and corporate responsibility. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721LaidlawE.2015Cambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978110727872110.1017/CBO9781107278721Search in Google Scholar
Land, M. K. (2019). Regulating private harms online: Content regulation under human rights law. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms (pp. 285–316). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.LandM. K.2019Regulating private harms online: Content regulation under human rights lawInJørgensenR. F.(Ed.),285316Cambridge, MassachusettsMIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
MacKinnon, R., Hickok, E., Bar, A., & Lim, H. (2014). Fostering freedom online: The role of Internet intermediaries. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231162MacKinnonR.HickokE.BarA.LimH.2014UNESCOhttps://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231162Search in Google Scholar
Maclay, C. M. (2014). An improbable coalition: How businesses, non-governmental organizations, investors and academics formed the global network initiative to promote privacy and free expression online. (A dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:336802/fulltext.pdfMaclayC. M.2014(A dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:336802/fulltext.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Moore, M. (2016, April). Tech giants and civic power. Centre for the study of Media, Communication & Power, King’s College London. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/cmcp/tech-giants-and-civic-power.pdfMooreM.2016AprilCentre for the study of Media, Communication & Power, King’s College London. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/cmcp/tech-giants-and-civic-power.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Pillay, N. (2014). The right to privacy in the digital age (A/HRC/27/37). The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.PillayN.2014(A/HRC/27/37). The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.Search in Google Scholar
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2016). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 15(7), 751–760.PlantinJ.-C.LagozeC.EdwardsP. N.SandvigC.2016Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook15775176010.1177/1461444816661553Search in Google Scholar
Ranking Digital Rights. (2019). 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/Ranking Digital Rights2019Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/Search in Google Scholar
Riis, T., & Schwemer, S. F. (2019). Leaving the European safe harbor, sailing toward algoritmic content regulation. Journal of Internet Law, 22(7), 11–21.RiisT.SchwemerS. F.2019Leaving the European safe harbor, sailing toward algoritmic content regulation2271121Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.RobertsS. T.2019New Haven, ConnecticutYale University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Santa Clara Principles. (2018). The Santa Clara principles on transparency and accountability in content moderation. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://santaclaraprinciples.orgSanta Clara Principles2018Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://santaclaraprinciples.orgSearch in Google Scholar
Šimonovic, D. (2018). Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). United Nations, Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1641160?ln=enŠimonovicD.2018(A/HRC/38/47). United Nations, Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1641160?ln=enSearch in Google Scholar
Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.SuzorN. P.2019CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/9781108666428Search in Google Scholar
Tambini, D., Leonardi, D., & Marsden, C. (2008). Codifying cyberspace: Communications self-regulation in the age of Internet convergence. New York: Routledge.TambiniD.LeonardiD.MarsdenC.2008New YorkRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRCom). (2004, March 29). General comment no. 31 [80]: The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on state parties to the covenant (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13). https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRCom)2004March29(CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13). https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2011, March 21). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. (Report of the special representative of the secretary-general on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie). https://www.ohchr.org/documents/issues/business/A.HRC.17.31.pdfUnited Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)2011March21(Report of the special representative of the secretary-general on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie). https://www.ohchr.org/documents/issues/business/A.HRC.17.31.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2012, July 16). The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet (A/HRC/20/8). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/731540?ln=enUnited Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)2012July16(A/HRC/20/8). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/731540?ln=enSearch in Google Scholar
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.van DijckJ.PoellT.de WaalM.2018New YorkOxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wagner B., Kettemann, M. C., & Vieth, K. (Eds.). (2019). Research handbook on human rights and digital technology: Global politics, law and international relations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.WagnerB.KettemannM. C.ViethK.(Eds.).2019Cheltenham, UKEdward Elgar Publishing10.4337/9781785367724Search in Google Scholar
York, J. C., & Zuckerman, E. (2019). Moderating the public sphere. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human Rights in the Age of Platforms (pp. 137–162). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.YorkJ. C.ZuckermanE.2019Moderating the public sphereInJørgensenR. F.(Ed.),137162Cambridge, MassachusettsMIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.ZuboffS.2019New YorkPublicAffairsSearch in Google Scholar