Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social Media Platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rights standards

ARTICLE 19. (2016). EU: European Commission’s code of conduct for countering illegal hate speech online and the framework decision. (Legal Analysis). London. https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38430/EU-Code-of-conduct-analysis-FINAL.pdf ARTICLE 19 2016 EU: European Commission’s code of conduct for countering illegal hate speech online and the framework decision (Legal Analysis). London. https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38430/EU-Code-of-conduct-analysis-FINAL.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Balkin, J. M. (2017). Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. UC Davies Law Review 51, 1149. BalkinJ. M. 2017 Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation UC Davies Law Review 51 1149 10.2139/ssrn.3038939 Search in Google Scholar

BBC News. (2016). Facebook u-turn over “napalm girl” photograph. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37318040 BBC News 2016 Facebook u-turn over “napalm girl” photograph BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37318040 Search in Google Scholar

Bickert, M. (2018, April 24). Publishing our internal enforcement guidelines and expanding our appeals process. Facebook News. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/ BickertM. 2018 April 24 Publishing our internal enforcement guidelines and expanding our appeals process Facebook News Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/ Search in Google Scholar

Brown, I. (2010). Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights. Index on Censorship 1, 98–106. BrownI. 2010 Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights Index on Censorship 1 98 106 10.1177/0306422010362193 Search in Google Scholar

BSR (2014). Legitimate and meaningful: Stakeholder engagement in human rights due diligence. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/engaging-with-rights-holders BSR 2014 Legitimate and meaningful: Stakeholder engagement in human rights due diligence Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/engaging-with-rights-holders Search in Google Scholar

Callamard, A. (2019). The human rights obligations of non-state actors. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms (pp. 191–225). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. CallamardA. 2019 The human rights obligations of non-state actors In JørgensenR. F. (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms 191 225 Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press Search in Google Scholar

Cooke, L. (2007). Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506072163 CookeL. 2007 Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation Journal of Information Science 33 3 360 376 https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506072163 10.1177/0165551506072163 Search in Google Scholar

Dangerous Speech Project. (2020). We study dangerous speech and ways to counteract it. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://dangerousspeech.org Dangerous Speech Project 2020 We study dangerous speech and ways to counteract it Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://dangerousspeech.org Search in Google Scholar

Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR). (2017). Hadefulde ytringer i den offentlige debat [Hate speech in the online public debate]. (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/media/dokumenter/udgivelser/ligebehandling_2017/rapport_hadefulde_ytringer_online_2017.pdf Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR) 2017 Hadefulde ytringer i den offentlige debat [Hate speech in the online public debate] (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/media/dokumenter/udgivelser/ligebehandling_2017/rapport_hadefulde_ytringer_online_2017.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR). (2019). Demokratisk deltagelse på Facebook [Democratic participation on Facebook]. (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/04_april_19/Rapport%20om%20demokratisk%20deltagelse.pdf Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR) 2019 Demokratisk deltagelse på Facebook [Democratic participation on Facebook] (In Danish – includes English summary). Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/04_april_19/Rapport%20om%20demokratisk%20deltagelse.pdf Search in Google Scholar

DR Medieforskning. (2018). Medieudvikling 2018 [Media development 2018]. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.dr.dk/om-dr/fakta-om-dr/medieforskning/medieudviklingen/2018 DR Medieforskning 2018 Medieudvikling 2018 [Media development 2018] Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.dr.dk/om-dr/fakta-om-dr/medieforskning/medieudviklingen/2018 Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament, Council of the European Union (EPCO). (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Directive 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/oj European Parliament, Council of the European Union (EPCO) 2018 Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Directive 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/oj Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (EC). (2000). Directive on electronic commerce (2000/31/EC). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0031:en:HTML European Commission (EC) 2000 Directive on electronic commerce (2000/31/EC) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0031:en:HTML Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (EC). (2016). EU code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online. https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-andxenophobia/countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en European Commission (EC) 2016 EU code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-andxenophobia/countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (EC). (2017). Tackling illegal content online: Towards an enhanced responsibility of online platforms (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-tackling-illegal-content-online-towards-enhanced-responsibility-online-platforms European Commission (EC) 2017 Tackling illegal content online: Towards an enhanced responsibility of online platforms (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-tackling-illegal-content-online-towards-enhanced-responsibility-online-platforms Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (EC). (2018a). Commission recommendation (EU) 2018/334 of 1 March 2018 on measures to effectively tackle illegal content online (Official Journal of the European Union L63/50). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0334&from=FR European Commission (EC) 2018a Commission recommendation (EU) 2018/334 of 1 March 2018 on measures to effectively tackle illegal content online (Official Journal of the European Union L63/50). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0334&from=FR Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (EC). (2018b). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online. COM (2018) 640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:dc0b5b0f-b65f-11e8-99ee-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF European Commission (EC) 2018b Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online. COM (2018) 640 final https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:dc0b5b0f-b65f-11e8-99ee-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF Search in Google Scholar

European Council. (2008). Council framework decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008F0913&from=EN European Council 2008 Council framework decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008F0913&from=EN Search in Google Scholar

Facebook transparency. (2020). Community standards enforcement report. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcement Facebook transparency 2020 Community standards enforcement report Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcement Search in Google Scholar

Frydman, B., Hennebel, L., & Lewkowicz, G. (2009). Public strategies for Internet co-regulation in the United States, Europe and China. In E. Brousseau, M. Marzouki, & C. Meadel (Eds.), Governance, regulations and powers on the internet (pp. 133–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. FrydmanB. HennebelL. LewkowiczG. 2009 Public strategies for Internet co-regulation in the United States, Europe and China In BrousseauE. MarzoukiM. MeadelC. (Eds.), Governance, regulations and powers on the internet 133 150 Cambridge Cambridge University Press Search in Google Scholar

German Law Review. (2017). Network enforcement act. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=1245 German Law Review 2017 Network enforcement act Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=1245 Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. GillespieT. 2018 Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media New Haven, Connecticut Yale University Press Search in Google Scholar

GOV.UK. (2019, April 8). Closed consultation: Online harms white paper. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper GOV.UK 2019 April 8 Closed consultation: Online harms white paper Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper Search in Google Scholar

Hope, C., & McCann, K. (2017, September 19). Google, Facebook and Twitter told to take down terror content within two hours or face fines. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/19/googlefacebook-twitter-told-take-terror-content-within-two/ HopeC. McCannK. 2017 September 19 Google, Facebook and Twitter told to take down terror content within two hours or face fines The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/19/googlefacebook-twitter-told-take-terror-content-within-two/ Search in Google Scholar

ICCPR (1966, December 16). International covenant on civil and political rights. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx ICCPR 1966 December 16 International covenant on civil and political rights United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, R. F. (2013). Framing the net: The Internet and human rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. JørgensenR. F. 2013 Framing the net: The Internet and human rights Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar Publishing 10.4337/9781782540809 Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, R. F. (2017). Framing human rights: Exploring storytelling within internet companies. Information, Communication & Society 21(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289233 JørgensenR. F. 2017 Framing human rights: Exploring storytelling within internet companies Information, Communication & Society 21 3 340 355 https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289233 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289233 Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, R. F. (2018). Human rights and private actors in the online domain. In M. K. Land, & J. D. Aronson (Eds.), New technologies for human rights law and practice (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. JørgensenR. F. 2018 Human rights and private actors in the online domain In LandM. K. AronsonJ. D. (Eds.), New technologies for human rights law and practice 243 269 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10.1017/9781316838952.011 Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, R. F. (Ed.). (2019) Human Rights in the Age of Platforms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. JørgensenR. F. (Ed.). 2019 Human Rights in the Age of Platforms Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press 10.7551/mitpress/11304.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, R. F., & Pedersen, A. M. (2017). Online service providers as human rights arbiters. In M. Taddeo, & L. Floridi (Eds.), The responsibilities of online service providers (pp. 179–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press. JørgensenR. F. PedersenA. M. 2017 Online service providers as human rights arbiters In TaddeoM. FloridiL. (Eds.), The responsibilities of online service providers 179 199 Oxford Oxford University Press 10.1007/978-3-319-47852-4_10 Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, R. F., Pedersen, A. M., Benedek, W., & Nindler, R. (2015, November 30). Case study on ICT and human rights (policies of EU) (Work package no. 2 – deliverable no. 3). European Commission. http://www.fp7-frame.eu JørgensenR. F. PedersenA. M. BenedekW. NindlerR. 2015 November 30 Case study on ICT and human rights (policies of EU) (Work package no. 2 – deliverable no. 3). European Commission. http://www.fp7-frame.eu Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, R. F., Veiberg, C. B., & ten Oever, N. (2019). Exploring the role of HRIA in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector. In N. Götzmann (Ed.), Handbook on human rights impact assessment (pp. 205–218). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. JørgensenR. F. VeibergC. B. ten OeverN. 2019 Exploring the role of HRIA in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector In GötzmannN. (Ed.), Handbook on human rights impact assessment 205 218 Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar Publishing 10.4337/9781788970006.00022 Search in Google Scholar

Kaye, D. (2016). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. (A/HRC/32/38). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/32/38 KayeD. 2016 Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/HRC/32/38). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/32/38 Search in Google Scholar

Kaye, D. (2018). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/HRC/38/35). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/ContentRegulation.aspx KayeD. 2018 Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/HRC/38/35). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/ContentRegulation.aspx Search in Google Scholar

Kaye, D., Cannataci, J., & Ní Aoláin, F. (2018, December 7). Mandates of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the special rapporteur on the right to privacy and the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism (Reference: OL OTH 71/2018). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=24234 KayeD. CannataciJ. Ní AoláinF. 2018 December 7 Mandates of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the special rapporteur on the right to privacy and the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism (Reference: OL OTH 71/2018). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=24234 Search in Google Scholar

Keller, D. (2018). Internet platforms: Observations on speech, danger, and money (Aegis series paper no. 1807). A Hoover Institution essay, Stanford University, California. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/files/publication/files/381732092-internet-platforms-observations-on-speech-danger-and-money.pdf KellerD. 2018 Internet platforms: Observations on speech, danger, and money (Aegis series paper no. 1807). A Hoover Institution essay, Stanford University, California. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/files/publication/files/381732092-internet-platforms-observations-on-speech-danger-and-money.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Kerr, A., Musiani, F., & Pohle, J. (2019). Communication and internet policy: A critical rights-based history and future. Internet Policy Review, 8(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3434969 KerrA. MusianiF. PohleJ. 2019 Communication and internet policy: A critical rights-based history and future Internet Policy Review 8 1 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3434969 10.14763/2019.1.1395 Search in Google Scholar

Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598–1670. KlonickK. 2018 The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech Harvard Law Review 131 6 1598 1670 Search in Google Scholar

Korff, D. (2014). The rule of law on the Internet and in the wider digital world (Issue paper). Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/cybersecurity-capacity/system/files/70114_Rule%20of%20Law%20on%20the%20Internet_web.pdf KorffD. 2014 The rule of law on the Internet and in the wider digital world (Issue paper). Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/cybersecurity-capacity/system/files/70114_Rule%20of%20Law%20on%20the%20Internet_web.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Laidlaw, E. (2015). Regulating speech in cyberspace: Gatekeepers, human rights and corporate responsibility. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721 LaidlawE. 2015 Regulating speech in cyberspace: Gatekeepers, human rights and corporate responsibility Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721 10.1017/CBO9781107278721 Search in Google Scholar

Land, M. K. (2019). Regulating private harms online: Content regulation under human rights law. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms (pp. 285–316). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. LandM. K. 2019 Regulating private harms online: Content regulation under human rights law In JørgensenR. F. (Ed.), Human rights in the age of platforms 285 316 Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press Search in Google Scholar

MacKinnon, R., Hickok, E., Bar, A., & Lim, H. (2014). Fostering freedom online: The role of Internet intermediaries. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231162 MacKinnonR. HickokE. BarA. LimH. 2014 Fostering freedom online: The role of Internet intermediaries UNESCO https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231162 Search in Google Scholar

Maclay, C. M. (2014). An improbable coalition: How businesses, non-governmental organizations, investors and academics formed the global network initiative to promote privacy and free expression online. (A dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:336802/fulltext.pdf MaclayC. M. 2014 An improbable coalition: How businesses, non-governmental organizations, investors and academics formed the global network initiative to promote privacy and free expression online (A dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy). Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:336802/fulltext.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Moore, M. (2016, April). Tech giants and civic power. Centre for the study of Media, Communication & Power, King’s College London. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/cmcp/tech-giants-and-civic-power.pdf MooreM. 2016 April Tech giants and civic power Centre for the study of Media, Communication & Power, King’s College London. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/cmcp/tech-giants-and-civic-power.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Pillay, N. (2014). The right to privacy in the digital age (A/HRC/27/37). The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. PillayN. 2014 The right to privacy in the digital age (A/HRC/27/37). The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Search in Google Scholar

Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2016). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 15(7), 751–760. PlantinJ.-C. LagozeC. EdwardsP. N. SandvigC. 2016 Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook New Media & Society 15 7 751 760 10.1177/1461444816661553 Search in Google Scholar

Ranking Digital Rights. (2019). 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/ Ranking Digital Rights 2019 2019 Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/ Search in Google Scholar

Riis, T., & Schwemer, S. F. (2019). Leaving the European safe harbor, sailing toward algoritmic content regulation. Journal of Internet Law, 22(7), 11–21. RiisT. SchwemerS. F. 2019 Leaving the European safe harbor, sailing toward algoritmic content regulation Journal of Internet Law 22 7 11 21 Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. RobertsS. T. 2019 Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media New Haven, Connecticut Yale University Press Search in Google Scholar

Santa Clara Principles. (2018). The Santa Clara principles on transparency and accountability in content moderation. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://santaclaraprinciples.org Santa Clara Principles 2018 The Santa Clara principles on transparency and accountability in content moderation Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://santaclaraprinciples.org Search in Google Scholar

Šimonovic, D. (2018). Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). United Nations, Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1641160?ln=en ŠimonovicD. 2018 Report of the special rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). United Nations, Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1641160?ln=en Search in Google Scholar

Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. SuzorN. P. 2019 Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10.1017/9781108666428 Search in Google Scholar

Tambini, D., Leonardi, D., & Marsden, C. (2008). Codifying cyberspace: Communications self-regulation in the age of Internet convergence. New York: Routledge. TambiniD. LeonardiD. MarsdenC. 2008 Codifying cyberspace: Communications self-regulation in the age of Internet convergence New York Routledge Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRCom). (2004, March 29). General comment no. 31 [80]: The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on state parties to the covenant (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13). https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRCom) 2004 March 29 General comment no. 31 [80]: The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on state parties to the covenant (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13). https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2011, March 21). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. (Report of the special representative of the secretary-general on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie). https://www.ohchr.org/documents/issues/business/A.HRC.17.31.pdf United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) 2011 March 21 Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework (Report of the special representative of the secretary-general on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie). https://www.ohchr.org/documents/issues/business/A.HRC.17.31.pdf Search in Google Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2012, July 16). The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet (A/HRC/20/8). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/731540?ln=en United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) 2012 July 16 The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet (A/HRC/20/8). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/731540?ln=en Search in Google Scholar

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press. van DijckJ. PoellT. de WaalM. 2018 The platform society: Public values in a connective world New York Oxford University Press 10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Wagner B., Kettemann, M. C., & Vieth, K. (Eds.). (2019). Research handbook on human rights and digital technology: Global politics, law and international relations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. WagnerB. KettemannM. C. ViethK. (Eds.). 2019 Research handbook on human rights and digital technology: Global politics, law and international relations Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar Publishing 10.4337/9781785367724 Search in Google Scholar

York, J. C., & Zuckerman, E. (2019). Moderating the public sphere. In R. F. Jørgensen (Ed.), Human Rights in the Age of Platforms (pp. 137–162). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. YorkJ. C. ZuckermanE. 2019 Moderating the public sphere In JørgensenR. F. (Ed.), Human Rights in the Age of Platforms 137 162 Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press Search in Google Scholar

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs. ZuboffS. 2019 The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power New York PublicAffairs Search in Google Scholar