[Alonso-Carrera, J., &Bouché, S. (2019). Capital accumulation when consumers are tempted by others consumption experience. Oxford Economic Papers, 72(3), 804–828. doi:10.1093/oep/gpz04610.1093/oep/gpz046]Search in Google Scholar
[Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., & Long, N. V. (2011). Relative consumption and renewable resource extraction under alternative property-rights regimes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(4), 1028–1053. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.09.00310.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Aronsson, T., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2014). State-variable public goods and social comparisons. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(2), 390–410. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.07.00110.1016/j.jeem.2014.07.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, G., & Mulligan, C. (1997). The endogenous determination of time preference. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 729–758.Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/295125410.1162/003355397555334]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouché, S. (2017). Aspirations, environmental quality and optimal tax policy. ECOBAS Working Papers, 2016-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouché, S., &de Miguel, C. (2019). Endogenous aspirations, growth and the rise of environmental concerns. Energy Economics, 84(S1). doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2019.10452610.1016/j.eneco.2019.104526]Search in Google Scholar
[Brekke, K. A., & Howarth, R. B. (2003). Status, growth, and the environment: goods as symbols in applied welfare economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brekke, K. A., Howarth, R. B. & Nyborg, K. (2003). Status-seeking and material affluence: evaluating the Hirsch hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 45(1), 29–39. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00262-810.1016/S0921-8009(02)00262-8]Search in Google Scholar
[de la Croix, D. (1996). The dynamics of bequeathed tastes. Economics Letters, 53(1), 89–96. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(96)00888-910.1016/S0165-1765(96)00888-9]Search in Google Scholar
[de la Croix, D., & Michel, P. (1998). Optimal growth when tastes are inherited. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23(4), 519–537.doi:10.1016/S0165-1889(98)00028-110.1016/S0165-1889(98)00028-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Diamond, P. A. (1965). National debt in the neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, 55, 279–293. Retrieved from: https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aer]Search in Google Scholar
[Eckerstorfer, P., & Wendner, R. (2013). Asymmetric and non-atmospheric consumption externalities, and efficient consumption taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 106, 42–56. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.07.00310.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Goerke, L., & Hellesheim, I. (2013). Relative consumption, working time, and trade unions. Labour Economics, 24, 170–179. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2013.08.00210.1016/j.labeco.2013.08.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirsch, F. (1976). The social limits to growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674497900]Search in Google Scholar
[Howarth, R. B. (1996). Status effects and environmental externalities. Ecological Economics, 16(1), 25–34. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(95)00076-310.1016/0921-8009(95)00076-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Howarth, R. B. (2006). Optimal environmental taxes under relative consumption effects. Ecological Economics, 58(1), 209–219. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.00710.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, K.X.D., Liu, Z. & Zhu, J.Q. (2015). Temptation and self-control: some evidence and applications. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 47, 581-615. doi:10.1111/jmcb.1222210.1111/jmcb.12222]Search in Google Scholar
[John, A., & Pecchenino, R. (1994). An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment. The Economic Journal, 104(427), 1393–1410. doi:10.2307/223545510.2307/2235455]Search in Google Scholar
[John, A., Pecchenino R., Schimmelpfennig, D & Schreft, S. (1995). Short-lived agents and the long-lived environment. Journal of Public Economics, 58(1), 127–141. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(94)01459-210.1016/0047-2727(94)01459-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Ljungqvist, L., & Uhlig, H. (2000). Tax policy and aggregate demand management under catching up with the Joneses. American Economic Review, 90(3), 356–366. doi:10.1257/aer.90.3.35610.1257/aer.90.3.356]Search in Google Scholar
[Long, N. V., & Wang, S. (2009). Resource grabbing by status-conscious agents. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.09.00510.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Ng, Y. K., & Wang, J. (1993). Relative income, aspiration, environmental quality, individual and political myopia: why may the rat race for material growth be welfare reducing? Mathematical Social Sciences, 26(1), 3–23. doi:10.1016/0165-4896(93)90008-710.1016/0165-4896(93)90008-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Wendner, R. (2003). Status, environmental externality, and optimal tax programs. Economics Bulletin, 8(5), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/eb/]Search in Google Scholar
[Wendner, R. (2005). Frames of reference, the environment, and efficient taxation. Economics of Governance, 6(1), 13–31. doi:10.1007/s10101-004-0086-610.1007/s10101-004-0086-6]Search in Google Scholar