This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISO. (2003). Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full — Part 1: General principles and requirements. ISO 5167-1:2003. https://www.iso.org/standard/28064.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Reader-Harris, M. (2015). Orifice Plates and Venturi Tubes. Springer, ISBN 978-3319168791.Search in Google Scholar
Nasiruddin, S., Singh, S. N. (2021). Performance evaluation of an innovative design modification of an orifice meter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 80, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101944Search in Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., Singh, S. N., Seshadri, V. (2010). Performance evaluation of orifice plate assemblies under non-standard conditions using CFD. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, 17, 397-406.Search in Google Scholar
Abd, H. M., Alomar, O. R., Mohamed, I. A. (2019). Effects of varying orifice diameter and Reynolds number on discharge coefficient and wall pressure. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 65, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.01.004Search in Google Scholar
Dayev, Z. A., Kairakbaev, A. K. (2019). Modeling of coefficient of contraction of differential pressure flowmeters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 66, 128-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.02.009Search in Google Scholar
Tharakan, T. J., Rafeeque, T. A. (2016). The role of backpressure on discharge coefficient of sharp edged injection orifices. Aerospace Science and Technology, 49, 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.12.014Search in Google Scholar
Beck, S. B. M., Mazille, J. (2002). A study of a pressure differential flow meter that is insensitive to inlet conditions. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 12 (5-6), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(01)00034-6Search in Google Scholar
Kumar, P., Ming Bing, M. W. (2011). A CFD study of low pressure wet gas metering using slotted orifice meters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 22 (1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar
Huang, S., Ma, T., Wang, D., Lin, Z. (2013). Study on discharge coefficient of perforated orifices as a new kind of flowmeter. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 46, 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.11.022Search in Google Scholar
Malavasi, S., Messa, G., Fratino, U., Pagano, A. (2012). On the pressure losses through perforated plates. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 28, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.07.006Search in Google Scholar
Barros Filho, J. A., Santos, A. A. C., Navarro, M. A., Jordão, E. (2015). Effect of chamfer geometry on the pressure drop of perforated plates with thin orifices. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 284, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.12.009Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, T., Zhang, J., Ma, L. (2011). A general structural design methodology for multi-hole orifices and its experimental application. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25, 2237-2246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0706-3Search in Google Scholar
Singh, V. K., Tharakan, T. J. (2015). Numerical simulations for multi-hole orifice flow meter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 45, 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.08.004Search in Google Scholar
Đurđević, M., Bukurov, M., Tašin, S., Bikić, S. (2019). Experimental research of single-hole and multi-hole orifice gas flow meters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 70, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101650Search in Google Scholar
Đurđević, M., Bukurov, M., Tašin, S., Bikić, S. (2020). Numerical study of single-hole and multi-holes orifice flow parameters. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 14, 215-226. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.14.01.31472Search in Google Scholar
Mehmood, M. A., Ibrahim, M. A., Ullah A., Inayat, M. H. (2019). CFD study of pressure loss characteristics of multi-holed orifice plates using central composite design. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 70, 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101654Search in Google Scholar
Raheem, A., Siddiqi, A. S. B., Ibrahim, A., Ullah, A., Inayat, M. H. (2021). Evaluation of multi-holed orifice flowmeters under developing flow conditions – An experimental study. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 79, 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101894Search in Google Scholar
El-Azm Aly, A. A., Chong, A., Nicolleau, F., Beck, S. (2010). Experimental study of the pressure drop after fractal-shaped orifices in turbulent pipe flows. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 34 (1), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.09.008Search in Google Scholar
Hasečic, A., Imamovic, J., Bikic, S., Dzaferovic, E. (2021). Investigation of the contamination influence on the parameters of gas flow through multihole orifice flowmeter. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 7501808. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3063198Search in Google Scholar
Zedan, M. F., Teyssandier, R. G. (1990). Effect of errors in pressure tap locations on the discharge coefficient of a flange tapped orifice plate. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1 (3), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(9090003-P)Search in Google Scholar
Erdal, A., Andersson, H. I. (1997). Numerical aspects of flow computation through orifices. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 8 (1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(97)00017-4Search in Google Scholar
Shah, M. S., Joshi, J. B., Kalsi, A. S., Prasad, C. S. R., Shukla, D. S. (2012). Analysis of flow through an orifice meter: CFD simulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 71, 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.11.022Search in Google Scholar
Hubert, M., Vandervieren, E. (2008). An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52 (12), 5186-5201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.11.008Search in Google Scholar