The Effect of Differential Pressure and Permanent Pressure Loss on Multi-Hole Orifice Plate

[1] ISO. (2003). Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full — Part 1: General principles and requirements. ISO 5167-1:2003. https://www.iso.org/standard/28064.html Search in Google Scholar

[2] Reader-Harris, M. (2015). Orifice Plates and Venturi Tubes. Springer, ISBN 978-3319168791. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Nasiruddin, S., Singh, S. N. (2021). Performance evaluation of an innovative design modification of an orifice meter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 80, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101944 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Singh, R. K., Singh, S. N., Seshadri, V. (2010). Performance evaluation of orifice plate assemblies under non-standard conditions using CFD. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, 17, 397-406. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Abd, H. M., Alomar, O. R., Mohamed, I. A. (2019). Effects of varying orifice diameter and Reynolds number on discharge coefficient and wall pressure. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 65, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.01.004 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dayev, Z. A., Kairakbaev, A. K. (2019). Modeling of coefficient of contraction of differential pressure flowmeters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 66, 128-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.02.009 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Tharakan, T. J., Rafeeque, T. A. (2016). The role of backpressure on discharge coefficient of sharp edged injection orifices. Aerospace Science and Technology, 49, 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.12.014 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Beck, S. B. M., Mazille, J. (2002). A study of a pressure differential flow meter that is insensitive to inlet conditions. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 12 (5-6), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(01)00034-6 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kumar, P., Ming Bing, M. W. (2011). A CFD study of low pressure wet gas metering using slotted orifice meters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 22 (1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.12.002 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Huang, S., Ma, T., Wang, D., Lin, Z. (2013). Study on discharge coefficient of perforated orifices as a new kind of flowmeter. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 46, 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.11.022 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Malavasi, S., Messa, G., Fratino, U., Pagano, A. (2012). On the pressure losses through perforated plates. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 28, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.07.006 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Barros Filho, J. A., Santos, A. A. C., Navarro, M. A., Jordão, E. (2015). Effect of chamfer geometry on the pressure drop of perforated plates with thin orifices. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 284, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.12.009 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Zhao, T., Zhang, J., Ma, L. (2011). A general structural design methodology for multi-hole orifices and its experimental application. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25, 2237-2246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0706-3 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Singh, V. K., Tharakan, T. J. (2015). Numerical simulations for multi-hole orifice flow meter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 45, 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.08.004 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Đurđević, M., Bukurov, M., Tašin, S., Bikić, S. (2019). Experimental research of single-hole and multi-hole orifice gas flow meters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 70, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101650 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Đurđević, M., Bukurov, M., Tašin, S., Bikić, S. (2020). Numerical study of single-hole and multi-holes orifice flow parameters. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 14, 215-226. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.14.01.31472 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mehmood, M. A., Ibrahim, M. A., Ullah A., Inayat, M. H. (2019). CFD study of pressure loss characteristics of multi-holed orifice plates using central composite design. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 70, 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101654 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Raheem, A., Siddiqi, A. S. B., Ibrahim, A., Ullah, A., Inayat, M. H. (2021). Evaluation of multi-holed orifice flowmeters under developing flow conditions – An experimental study. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 79, 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101894 Search in Google Scholar

[19] El-Azm Aly, A. A., Chong, A., Nicolleau, F., Beck, S. (2010). Experimental study of the pressure drop after fractal-shaped orifices in turbulent pipe flows. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 34 (1), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.09.008 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hasečic, A., Imamovic, J., Bikic, S., Dzaferovic, E. (2021). Investigation of the contamination influence on the parameters of gas flow through multihole orifice flowmeter. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 7501808. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3063198 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zedan, M. F., Teyssandier, R. G. (1990). Effect of errors in pressure tap locations on the discharge coefficient of a flange tapped orifice plate. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1 (3), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(9090003-P) Search in Google Scholar

[22] ANSYS Inc. (2013). ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide, 724. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Erdal, A., Andersson, H. I. (1997). Numerical aspects of flow computation through orifices. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 8 (1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(97)00017-4 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Shah, M. S., Joshi, J. B., Kalsi, A. S., Prasad, C. S. R., Shukla, D. S. (2012). Analysis of flow through an orifice meter: CFD simulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 71, 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.11.022 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hubert, M., Vandervieren, E. (2008). An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52 (12), 5186-5201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.11.008 Search in Google Scholar