[
Becker, A. L., 1988. Language in particular. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), Linguistics in Context. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 17–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhaskar, R., 2008[1975]. A Realist Theory of Social Science. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaser, M., 2009. Political Ontology. Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896, available at: < DOI: 10.1080/09502380903208023 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brandt, S., 2017. Sellars and Quine on empiricism and conceptual truth. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(1), 108–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carnap, R., 1950. Empiricism, semantics and otology. In Carnap, R., Meaning and Necessity. London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 205–221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N., 1959. A review of BF Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N., 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cobley, P., 2016. Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2011. Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 185–209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2017a. Changing the idea of language: Nigel Love’s perspective. Language Sciences, 61, 43–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2017b. Entrenchment: A view from radical embodied cognitive science. In Schmid, H. J. (Ed.), Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How we Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, pp. 409–434.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2019a. The return of languaging: Toward a new ecolinguistics. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 483–512.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2019b. Languaging evolved: A distributed perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 461–482.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2021. For an actional ethics: Making better sense of science. In Reconsidering extinction in terms of the history of global bioethics. Routledge: New York, pp. 205–221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2023. Living the duty of care: languaging in semiotic fields. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 19(1), 115–136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., 2024. Regeneration: from language use to languaging. In Steffensen, S.V., Döring, M., Cowley, S. J. (Eds.), Language as an Ecological Phenomenon. London: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., Fester-Seeger, M. T., 2023. Re-evoking absent people: what languaging implies for radical embodiment. Linguistic Frontiers, 6(2), 64–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., Gahrn-Andersen, R., 2023. How systemic cognition enables epistemic engineering. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 5, 960384.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., Kuhle, A., 2020. The rise of languaging. Biosystems, 198, 104264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidson, D., 1979. The inscrutability of reference. The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 10(2), 7–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawson, S. K., Carmona, C. P., González‐Suárez, M. et al., 2021. The traits of “trait ecologists”: An analysis of the use of trait and functional trait terminology. Ecology and Evolution, 11(23), 16434–16445.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deely, J., 2015. What semiotics is. Language and Semiotic Studies, 1(1), 63–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demuro, E., Gurney, L., 2021. Languages/languaging as world-making: the ontological bases of language. Language Sciences, 83, 101307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Enfield, N. J., Kockelman, P. (Eds.), 2017. Distributed agency. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gahrn-Andersen, R., 2021. Conceptual attaching in perception and practice-based behavior. Lingua, 249, 102960.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gahrn-Andersen, R., 2023. Radicalizing radical linguistics: on the need to overcome the language–practice divide. Linguistic Frontiers, 6(2), 5–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, 2005. Review of Cambridge companion to Quine. In Gibson, E. (Ed.), Review of Metaphysics, 58, 3 660–662.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halliday, M. A. K., 2003[1997]. Linguistics as metaphor. In Webster, J. (Ed.), On Language and Linguistics: Vol. 3 of the Collected works M. A. K. Halliday. London: Continnum, pp. 248-270.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, R., 1981. The Language Myth. London: Duckworth.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heidegger, M., 2010. Being and Time. New York, Cambridge MA: MIT press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., Kirsh, D., 2000. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(2), 174–196.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilyin, M., 2023. The ongoing languaging revolution and more. Introduction. Linguistic Frontiers, 6(2), 1–4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knudsen, S., 2023. Critical realism in political ecology: An argument against flat ontology. Journal of Political Ecology, 30(1), 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, B., 1996. On interobjectivity. Mind, culture, and activity, 3(4), 228–245.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, B., Woolgar, S., 1986. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latsis, J., Lawson, C., Martins, M., 2007. Introduction: ontology, philosophy and the social sciences. In Lawson, C., Lastis, J., Martins, M. (Eds.), Introduction to Social Ontology. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leiter, B., 1997. Why Quine is not a Postmodernist. SMU Law Rev., 50, 1739.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, W. 2017. Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, (1), 9–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linell, P., 2005. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. Routledge: London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lorimer, F., 2013[1929]. The Growth of Reason: A Study of the Role of Verbal Activity in the Growth of the Structure of the Human Mind. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, N., 2004. Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26(6), 525–544.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, N., 2017. On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 113–147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margolis, J., 2016. Toward a Metaphysic of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merton, R. K., 1973[1942]. The normative structure of science. Reprinted in Merton, R., The Sociology of Science, Storer, N.W. (Ed.). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mulcaster, R., 1582. The first part of the elementarie vvich entreateth chefelie of the right writing of our English tung. Ann Arbor, MI, Oxford: Text creation partnership 2005-10 (EEBOTCP Phase 1). Available at: < https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A07881.0001.001?view=toc >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Shea, J., 2015. Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn. London: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patterson, D. M., 1996. Law and Truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pennycook, A., 2018. Linguistic landscapes and semiotic assemblages. In Pütz, M., Mundt, N. (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic Landscape: Linguistic Diversity, Multimodality and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 75–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Putnam, H., 1990. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quine, W., 1953. Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quine, W. V. O., 2013[1960]. Word and Object. Cambridge MA: MIT press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rorty, R., 1998. Hilary Putnam and the relativist menace. In Truth and Progress: Collected Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schatzki, T., 2016. Practice theory as flat ontology. In Schatzki, T. (Ed.), Practice theory and research: Exploring the dynamics of social life, 28–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, J., Marshall, G. (Eds.), 2005. A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sebeok, T. A., 1988. Language: How primary a modeling system? In Deely, J. (Ed.), Semiotics 1987, 15–27. Lanham: University Press of America.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seiberth, L. C., 2021. The role of languagings in Sellars’ theory of experience. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 15(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellars, W., 1956. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1(19), 253–329.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellars, W., 1962. Philosophy and the scientific image of man. Frontiers of science and philosophy, 1, 35–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellars, W., 1967. Some remarks on Kant’s theory of experience. Journal of Philosophy, 64, 633–647.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellars, W., 1979. In praise of something. In Naturalism and Ontology. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simonelli, R., 2022. Sellars’s ontological nominalism. European Journal of Philosophy, 30(3), 1041–1061.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simonelli, R., in press. Sellars’ two worlds. Pre-print version available at: < https://www.academia.edu/99511622/Sellarss_Two_Worlds > [Downloaded 02/11/2023].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sosa, E., 2020[1980]. The raft and the pyramid: coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge. In Arguing About Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 273–291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steffensen, S. V., Döring, M., Cowley, S. J., 2024. Ecolinguistics; living and language united. In Steffensen, S. V., Döring, M., Cowley, S. J. (Eds.), Language as an Ecological Phenomenon. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swain, M., 2009. Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. Advanced Language Learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 95–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Violle, C., Navas, M. L., Vile, D. et al., 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos, 116(5), 882–892.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vološinov, V. N., 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Matejka, L, Titunik, I. R. (Trans.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uexküll, J. von, 1992[1934]. ‘A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds’. Semiotica, 89(4), 319–391.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winter, S., 2001. Ontology: Buzzword or paradigm shift. Geographical Information Science, 15(7), 587–590.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wittgenstein, L.W., 1957. Philosophical Investigations (2nd ed.). Blackwell: Oxford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolff, C. F. von, 1736. Philosophia prima: sive ontologia. Prostat in Officina libraria Rengeriana.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, H., 2021. Modeling in semiotics: An integrative update. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 17(4), 639–659.
]Search in Google Scholar
