<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The paper rejects both mentalism and reduction of the trait of Language (capital L) to linguistic <italic>phenomena</italic>. What is termed <italic>lingualism</italic> is replaced by tracing wordings to practices that unite metabolism, coordinative activity and linguistic history. Like other partly cultural, partly natural traits (e.g. grazing), languaging enacts <italic>modelling</italic> (Sebeok 1988). In Yu’s (2021) terms, it extends how <italic>supersession</italic> informs morphogenesis, agency, sensing and acting. Having challenged lingualism, one deflates reports of experience. Appeal to practices and <italic>ontologies</italic> (not <italic>ontology</italic>) posit linguistic ‘objects’ or, in Sellars’s terms, versions of the Myth of the Given. With Sellars, therefore, I rethink the analytic/synthetic divide around the normative power of languaging. On such a view, practices, nonhumans and humans co-evolve with manifest and scientific modes of acting that are constituted by unknowable singular ontology. Knowing is inextricable from languaging and how the resources of cultural modelling are rendered and grasped by using the (simplexifying) powers of living human beings.</p>
</abstract>

The paper rejects both mentalism and reduction of the trait of Language (capital L) to linguistic phenomena. What is termed lingualism is replaced by tracing wordings to practices that unite metabolism, coordinative activity and linguistic history. Like other partly cultural, partly natural traits (e.g. grazing), languaging enacts modelling (Sebeok 1988). In Yu’s (2021) terms, it extends how supersession informs morphogenesis, agency, sensing and acting. Having challenged lingualism, one deflates reports of experience. Appeal to practices and ontologies (not ontology) posit linguistic ‘objects’ or, in Sellars’s terms, versions of the Myth of the Given. With Sellars, therefore, I rethink the analytic/synthetic divide around the normative power of languaging. On such a view, practices, nonhumans and humans co-evolve with manifest and scientific modes of acting that are constituted by unknowable singular ontology. Knowing is inextricable from languaging and how the resources of cultural modelling are rendered and grasped by using the (simplexifying) powers of living human beings.

Languaging and Practices: Intimations of a Singular Ontology

Linguistic Frontiers

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

{"article-title":"Languaging and Practices: Intimations of a Singular Ontology"}

The paper rejects both mentalism and reduction of the trait of Language (capital L) to linguistic phenomena. What is termed lingualism is replaced by tracing...

Languaging and Practices: Intimations of a Singular Ontology

Publié en ligne: 05 juil. 2024

Pages: 1 - 15

Reçu: 29 oct. 2023

Accepté: 05 févr. 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2024-0007

Mots clés
ontology, ecolinguistics, languaging, distributed language, practice theory

© 2024 Stephen J. Cowley, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Languaging and Practices: Intimations of a Singular Ontology

Publié en ligne: 05 juil. 2024

Pages: 1 - 15

Reçu: 29 oct. 2023

Accepté: 05 févr. 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2024-0007

Mots clésontology, ecolinguistics, languaging, distributed language, practice theory

© 2024 Stephen J. Cowley, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mots clés
ontology, ecolinguistics, languaging, distributed language, practice theory