[
Angermuller, J., 2013. How to become an academic philosopher. Academic discourse as a multileveled positioning practice. Sociología Histórica, 2, 263–289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Archer, L., 2008. Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity Studies in Higher Education 33(4): 385–403.10.1080/03075070802211729
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bamberg, M., 1997. Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 335–342.10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bamberg, M., 2004. Considering counter-narratives. In Bamberg, M., Andrews, M. (Eds.), Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense. Amsterdam: John Benjamins., pp. 351–371.10.1075/sin.4.43bam
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D., 2011. Discourse and identity construction. In Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S., & Vignoles, V. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 177–199.10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baynham, M., 2011. Stance, positioning, and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society 40(1). 63–74.10.1017/S0047404510000898
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becher, T., Trowler, P., 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of the Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergen, B. K., Plauché, M., 2001. Voilà voilà: Extensions of Deictic Constructions in French. In Cienki, A., Luka, B., & Smith, M. (Eds.). Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 238–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertrand, D., 2014. La sémiotique en France: chronique 2014. Signata 3, available at: < http://journals.openedition.org/signata/1360 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biglari, A., 2014. Entretiens sémiotiques. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanche-Benveniste, C., 2003. Le double jeu du pronom on. In Berré, M. (Ed.), La syntaxe raisonnée: Mélanges de linguistique générale et française offerts à Annie Boone à l’occasion de son 60e anniversaire. Louvainla-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur, pp. 41–56.10.3917/dbu.berre.2003.01.0041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouissac, P., 2021. The endless frontiers of semiotics. In: International Congress of the German Association of Semiotics. [Video], available at:< https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InIJwWeLH1s >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruner, J. S., 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bucholtz, M., Hall, K., 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, pp. 585–614.10.1177/1461445605054407
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carranza, I. E. 1998. Low-Narrativity Narratives and Argumentation. Narrative Inquiry 8(2): 287-317.10.1075/ni.8.2.04car
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colley, H., James. D., 2005. Unbecoming tutors: Towards a more dynamic notion of professional participation. Paper presented at Changing teacher roles, identities and professionalism, May 16, at King’s College London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cobley, P., Bankov, K., 2016. Vistas for organized global semiotics. Semiotica, 211 (1/4). 9–18, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0093 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cobley, P., Deely, J., Kull, K. et al., 2011. Semiotics continues to astonish. Thomas Sebeok and the doctrine of signs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110254389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danesi, M., 2012. The institutionalization of semiotics in North America. Signata, 3, 187–198, available at: < http://doi.org/10.4000/signata.871 >.10.4000/signata.871
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Darras, B., 2012. Qui sont les sémioticiens et que font-ils ? Enquête sur leurs relations avec le design et des médias. Signata, 3, 27–46, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.792 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, B., Harré, R., 2001. Positioning: the discursive production of selves. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (Eds), Discourse theory and practice. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deely, J., 2015a. Semiotics ‘Today’: The Twentieth-Century Founding and Twenty-First Century Projects. In Trifonas, P. P. (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics. New York: Springer, pp.29–114.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deely, J., 2015b. What semiotics is. Language and Semiotic Studies, 1(1), 63–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Fina, A., 2013. Positioning level 3. Connecting local identity displays to macro social processes. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 40–61, available at:< http://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.03de >.10.1075/ni.23.1.03de
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deppermann, A., 2015. Positioning. In De Fina, A., Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis. UK: Blackwell, pp. 369–387.10.1002/9781118458204.ch19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U., 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M., 1966. Les mots et les choses: une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M., 1969. L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaines, Elliot 2015. Understanding the Codes and Assumptions of New Media. In Peter P. Trifonas (Ed.), International Handbook of Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, 369–376.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gee, J. P., 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. London, UK: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gee, J. P., 2008. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203944806
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greimas, A. J., 1976. Sémiotique et sciences sociales. Paris: Seuil.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greimas, A. J., Courtés, J., 1983. Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haidar, J., 2006. Debate CEU-Rectoría. Torbellino pasional de los argumentos. Mexico City: UNAM.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmes, J., 2006. Workplace narratives, professional identity and relational practice. In De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. (Eds.), Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 166–187.10.1017/CBO9780511584459.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huutoniemi, K., 2010. Evaluating interdisciplinary research. In Frodeman, R., Thompson Klein, J., & Mitcham, C. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2008. The importance of semiotics to University: Semiosis makes the world locally plural. In Deely, J., Sbrocchi, L. G. (Eds.). Semiotics 2008: Specialization, Semiosis, Semiotics. Ottawa: Legas, pp. 494−514.10.5840/cpsem200833
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., Maran, T., 2013. Journals of semiotics in the world. Sign Systems Studies, 41(1), 140–145, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2013.41.1.08 >.10.12697/SSS.2013.41.1.08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., Välli, K., 2011. Semiotics for university: semiosis makes the world locally plural. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 5 (1), 246–272, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2011-0120 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., Salupere, S., Torop, P. et al., 2011. The institutionalization of semiotics in Estonia. Sign Systems Studies, 39 (2/4), 314–342, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.13 >.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull et al., 2015. A hundred introductions to semiotics, for a million students: Survey of semiotics textbooks and primers in the world. Sign Systems Studies, 43 (2/3), 281–346, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2015.43.2-3.0 >.10.12697/SSS.2015.43.2-3.0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, Y., 2006. The epistemological turn in semiotic strategy: from signs in the natural/cultural world to the semantic institutions of academic discourses. Semiotica, 162(1/4), pp. 175–193.10.1515/SEM.2006.076
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lotman. J., 2000. Universe of the Mind. A semiotic theory of culture. London: Tauris.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lucius-Hoene, Gabriele and Deppermann, Arnulf 2000. Narrative identity empiricized a dialogical and positioning approach to autobiographical research interviews. Narrative Inquiry 10(1): 199–222.10.1075/ni.10.1.15luc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth, W., 2010. The semiotics of teaching and the teaching of semiotics. In Semetsky, I. (Ed.), Semiotics education experience. Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 1–20.10.1163/9789460912252_002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pessoa de Barros, D. L., 2012. Directions et rôles de la sémiotique en Amérique du Sud: Premières réflexions. Signata, 3, 131–160, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.844 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C. S., 1998. The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings (1893-1913). Volume 2. USA: The Peirce Edition Project. Cited in text as CP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Posner, R., 2003. Semiotics and other interdisciplinary approaches. In Posner, R., Robering, K., & Sebeok, T. A. (Eds.), A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 2342–2374.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Posner, R., Robering, K., & Sebeok, T. A., 2003. A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rastier, F., 2001. Sémiotique et sciences de la culture. Linx, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.1058 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ricoeur, P., 2004. Parcours de la reconnaissance. Trois études. France: Stock.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riessman, C. K., 2005. Narrative Analysis. In Kelly, N., Horrocks, Ch., Milnes, K. et al. (Eds.), Narrative, Memory & Everyday Life. UK: University of Huddersfield, pp. 1–1 7, available at: < http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/4920/ >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salupere, S., 2011. Semiotics as science. Sign Systems Studies, 39 (2/4), 271–289, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.11 >.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schegloff, E. A., 2007. ‘Categories in action: person-reference and membership categorization’. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 433–461.10.1177/1461445607079162
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sebeok, Thomas A. 1976. Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Bloomington: Indiana University, and Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slembrouck, S., 2015. The role of the researcher in interview narratives. In De Fina, A., Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.). The handbook of narrative analysis. UK: Blackwell, pp. 239–254.10.1002/9781118458204.ch12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Søreide, G. E., 2006. Narrative construction of teacher identity: Positioning and negotiation. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 527–547.10.1080/13540600600832247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Saussure, F., 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. France: Payot.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarasti, E., 2012. Can semiotics be organized? Observations over a 40-year period. Signata, 3, 199–215, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.883 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torop, P., 1998. Semiotics in Tartu. Sign Systems Studies, 26, 9–19.10.12697/SSS.1998.26.00
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weingart, P., 2010. A Short history of knowledge formations. In Frodeman, R. et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wortham, S., Reyes. A., 2015. Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315735207
]Search in Google Scholar