A Teachers’ Coaching Approach to Sustainable Professional Development

Atteberry, A., & Bryk, A. S. (2011). Analyzing teacher participation in literacy coaching activities. The Elementary School Journal, 112(2), 356–382. https://doi.org/10.1086/661994 Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L Search in Google Scholar

Bean, R. M., Draper, J. A., Hall, V., Vandermolen, J., & Zigmond, N. (2010). Coaches and coaching in reading first schools: A reality check. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/653471 Search in Google Scholar

Bedford, T. (2022). Constructing a transformative sustainability pedagogy: Teacher empowerment for a sustainable future. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0002 Search in Google Scholar

Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/653468 Search in Google Scholar

Briede, L., & Drelinga, E. (2023). A more sustainable approach to evaluating teacher’s work. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0023 Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L. (1998). The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: A report of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.682 Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L. (2005). L’autorégulation de l’apprentissage et la collaboration dans le développement professionnel des enseignants [Self-regulation learning and collaboration in teacher professional development]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 31(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.7202/012358ar Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L. (2011). Investigating self-regulated learning using in-depth case studies. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (1^st ed., pp. 346–360). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L., & Cartier, S. C. (2018). Advancing research and practice about self-regulated learning: The promise of in-depth case study methodologies. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2^nd ed., pp. 352–369). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L., & Schnellert, L. (2012). Collaborative inquiry in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1206–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.009 Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Cartier, S. C. (2013). Layers of self- and co-regulation: Teachers working collaboratively to support adolescents’ self-regulated learning through reading. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Education Research International, 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/845694 Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & MacNeil, K. (2015). Collaborative inquiry and distributed agency in educational change: A case study of a multi-level community of inquiry. Journal of Educational Change, 16, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9227-z Search in Google Scholar

Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003 Search in Google Scholar

Camburn, E. M., Kimball, S. M., & Lowenhaupt, R. (2008). Going to scale with teacher leadership. Lessons learned from a districtwide literacy coach initiative. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 120–143). Teachers College Press. Search in Google Scholar

Cartier, S. C. (2007). Apprendre en lisant au primaire et au secondaire: mieux comprendre et mieux intervenir [Learning by reading in primary and secondary schools: better understanding and better intervention]. Éditions CEC. Search in Google Scholar

Cartier, S. C. (2008). Modèle d’analyse de la difficulté des élèves à apprendre de manière autorégulée en contexte de classe [Model for analyzing students’ difficulty in self-regulated learning in a classroom context]. University of Montreal. https://sylviecartier.com/IMG/pdf/.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Cartier, S. C. (2009). Apprendre en lisant: Développement professionnel de conseillers pédagogiques engagés dans une recherche-action en collaboration 2006–2008 [Learning by reading: Professional development of instructional coaches involved in collaborative action research]. University of Montreal. https://sylviecartier.com/IMG/pdf/Rapport_Cartier_coll-_Boulanger_et_Langlais-2009-2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Cartier, S. C., Arseneault, J., Leblanc, P.-M., Mourad, É., & Raoui, M. (2014). Apprendre en lisant: Développement professionnel de conseillers pédagogiques engagés dans une recherche-action en collaboration, Report of 2008–2009 & 2009–2010 [Learning by reading: Professional development of educational consultants involved in collabo-rative action research, 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 reports]. University of Montreal. https://sylviecartier.com/IMG/pdf/Cartier_et_coll-_rapport_2014-2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Cartier, S. C., & Bélanger, J. (2012). Soutien au développement professionnel d’équipes de conseillers pédagogiques dans le rôle d’accompagnement d’enseignants sur l’analyse de l’apprentissage par la lecture [Support for the professional development of teams of instructional coaches in their role of coaching teachers in the analysis of learning through reading]. University of Montreal. https://sylviecartier.com/IMG/pdf/Cartier_Belanger_et_coll-_rapport_PFCPS_2012_vf-2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Cartier, S. C., & Butler, D. L. (2016). Comprendre et évaluer l’apprentissage autorégulé dans des activités complexes [Understanding and assessing self-regulated learning in complex activities]. In B. Noël & S. C. Cartier (Eds.), De la métacognition à l’apprentissage autorégulé [From metacognition to self-regulated learning] (1^st ed., pp. 41–55). De Boeck Supérieur. Search in Google Scholar

Chien, C. (2013). Analysis of an instructional coach’s role as elementary school language teachers’ professional developer. Current Issues in Education, 16(1). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1004 Search in Google Scholar

Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.008 Search in Google Scholar

Cornett, J., & Knight, J. (2009). Research on coaching. In J. Cornett, J. Ellison, C. Hayes, J. Killion, J. A. Kise, J. Knight, W. M. Reinke, K. Reiss, R. Sprick, C. A. Toll & L. West (Eds.), Coaching: Approaches and perspectives (1^st ed., pp. 192–216). Corwin Press, Sage Company. Search in Google Scholar

Cosnefroy, L. (2009). Les théories reposant sur le concept de but [Theories based on the goal concept]. In P. Carré & F. Fenouillet (Eds.), Traité de la psychologie de la motivation [A treatise on motivational psychology] (1^st ed., pp. 90–110). Dunod. Search in Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Search in Google Scholar

Draelants, H. (2007). Entre le pair et l’expert, trouver la distance qui convient. Une question de légitimation pour le conseiller pédagogique [Finding the right distance between peer and expert. A question of legitimacy for the instructional coach]. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques, 38(1), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.4000/rsa.525 Search in Google Scholar

Duchesne, C., & Gagnon, N. (2013a). Les sources du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle des conseillers pédagogiques en tant que formateurs d’adultes [Sources of self-efficacy for instructional coaches as adult educators]. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(4). http://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/viewFile/1507/1652 Search in Google Scholar

Duchesne, C., & Gagnon, N. (2013b). Sentiment d’efficacité personnelle: Rehausser ce sentiment chez les conseillers pédagogiques [Sense of self-efficacy: Enhance the sense of self-efficacy among instructional coaches]. Éducation Canada, 53(4), 36–39. https://www.edcan.ca/articles/sentiment-defficacite-personnelle/?lang=fr Search in Google Scholar

Duchesne, C., & Gagnon, N. (2014). Des stratégies pour le développement et le maintien du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle en tant que formateurs d’adultes [Strategies for developing and maintaining a sense of self-efficacy as an adult educator]. Savoirs, 34, 71–84. https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.034.0071 Search in Google Scholar

Elish-Piper, L., & L’Allier, S. K. (2011). Examining the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading gains in grades K-3. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1086/660685 Search in Google Scholar

Fortin, M.-F. (2010). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche. Méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives [Foundations and stages of the research process. Quantitative and qualitative methods] (2^nd ed.). Chenelière Éducation Inc. Search in Google Scholar

Hai, P. T. T., Samsudin, M. A., Huy, N. H. D., Tri, N. Q., & An, N. N. (2023). Exploring the influences of teacher professional identity on teachers’ emotion among Vietnamese secondary school teachers. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0021 Search in Google Scholar

Hathaway, J. I., Martin, C. S., & Mraz, M. (2015). Revisiting the roles of literacy coaches: Does reality match research? Reading Psychology, 37(2), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1025165 Search in Google Scholar

Jermolajeva, E., & Trusina, I. (2022). Is sustainable development really sustainable-theoretical reflections, statistics and the need for changes. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0023 Search in Google Scholar

Knight, J. (2009). The key to translating research into practice lies in continuous, job-embedded learning with ongoing support. National Staff Development Council, 30(1), 18–22. Search in Google Scholar

Lafortune, L., & Martin, D. (2004). L’accompagnement: Processus de coconstruction et culture pédagogique [Coaching: Co-construction and pedagogical culture]. In M. L’Hostie & L.-P. Boucher (EdS.), L’accompagnement en éducation: Un soutien au renouvellement des pratiques [Coaching in education: Helping to renew practices] (1^st ed., pp. 47–62). Presses de l’Université du Québec. Search in Google Scholar

Legendre, R. (2005). Dictionnaire actuel de l’éducation [Current dictionary of education] (3^rd ed.). Guérin. Search in Google Scholar

Lessard, C. (2008). Entre savoirs d’expérience des enseignants, autorité ministérielle et recherche: Les conseillers pédagogiques [Between teachers’ experiential knowledge, ministerial authority and research: Pedagogical advisors]. In P. Perrenoud, M. Altet, C. Lessard & L. Paquay (Eds.), Conflits de savoirs en formation des enseignants [Conflicts of knowledge in teacher education] (1^st ed., pp. 169–182). De Boeck Supérieur. Search in Google Scholar

Lessard, C., & Des Ruisseaux, M. (2004). Les conseillers pédagogiques québécois ou comment combiner une identité professionnelle et l’approche client [Quebec instructional coaches, or how to combine a professional identity with a customer approach]. Recherches Sociologiques, XXXV(2), 141–154. Search in Google Scholar

Loiola, F., & Tardif, M. (2001). Formation pédagogique des professeurs d’université et conceptions de l’enseignement [Teacher training for university professors and conceptions of teaching]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 27(2), 305–326. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/rse/2001-v27-n2-rse847/009935ar/ Search in Google Scholar

Lowenhaupt, R., McKinney, S., & Reeves, T. (2013). Coaching in context: The role of relationships in the work of three literacy coaches. Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.847475 Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, J., & Ferguson, K. (2010). Reflections of elementary school literacy coaches on practice: Roles and perspectives. Canadian Journal of Education, 33(1), 199–227. http://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.33.1.199 Search in Google Scholar

Mangin, M. M. (2007). Facilitating elementary principals’ support for instructional teacher leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 319–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07299438 Search in Google Scholar

Mangin, M. M. (2009). Literacy coach role implementation: How district context influences reform efforts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(759), 759–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X09347731 Search in Google Scholar

Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., Correnti, R., Junker, B., & Bickel, D. D. (2010). Investigating the effectiveness of a comprehensive literacy coaching program in schools with high teacher mobility. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1086/653469 Search in Google Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2^nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Neuman, S. B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208328088 Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2023). Editorial: How do teachers promote the viability of education? Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0012 Search in Google Scholar

Sailors, M., & Price, L. (2015). Support for the improvement of practices through intensive coaching (SIPIC): A model of coaching for improving reading instruction and reading achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.008 Search in Google Scholar

Savoie-Zajc, L., Peters, M., Mercier, M., Desmarais, C., Lemay, I., Loranger, L., Sabourin, L., & Dumouchel, J. (2011). L’accompagnement pour soutenir l’émergence des communautés d’apprentissage et promouvoir la collaboration professionnelle: Des compétences à développer [Supporting the emergence of learning communities and promoting professional collaboration: Skills to develop]. In L. Portelance, C. Borges & J. Pharand (Eds.), La collaboration dans le milieu de l’éducation: Dimensions pratiques et perspectives théoriques [Collaboration in education: Practical dimensions and theoretical perspectives] (1^st ed., pp. 63–81). Presses de l’Université du Québec. Search in Google Scholar

Scott, S. E., Cortina, K. S., & Carlisle, J. F. (2012). Understanding coach-based professional development in reading first: How do coaches spend their time and how do teachers perceive coaches’ work? Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2011.569845 Search in Google Scholar

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2014). Énoncé de politique des trois conseils: éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains [Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans]. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/ger-pre/RR4-2-2014-fra.pd Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, L., & Kowal, J. (2007). Principal as instructional leader designing a coaching program that fits. Issue briefs. The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED499255 Search in Google Scholar

Stephens, D., Morgan, D. N., DeFord, D. E., Donnelly, A., Hamel, E. Keith, K. J., Brink, D. A., Johnson, R., Seaman, M., Young, J., Gallant, D. J., Hao, S., & Leigh, S. R. (2011). The impact of literacy coaches on teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(3), 215–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11413716 Search in Google Scholar

Sutherland, K. S., Conroy, M. A., Vo, A., & Ladwig, C. (2015). Implementation integrity of practice-based coaching: Preliminary results from the BEST in CLASS efficacy trial. School Mental Health, 7, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-014-9134-8 Search in Google Scholar

Teemant, A. (2014). A mixed-methods investigation of instructional coaching for teachers of diverse learners. Urban Education, 49(5), 574–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913481362 Search in Google Scholar

Teemant, A., Wink, J., & Tyra, S. (2011). Effects of coaching on teacher use of sociocultural instructional practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.006 Search in Google Scholar

Timoštšuk, I., & Lumi, N. (2022). Reflection of concept modeling on student teachers’ learning experiences from a primary education perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0009 Search in Google Scholar

Van Der Maren, J.-M. (1996). Méthodes de recherche pour l’éducation [Research methods for education] (2^nd ed.). Presses de l’Université du Québec & De Boeck. Search in Google Scholar

Vanderburg, M., & Stephens, D. (2010). The impact of literacy coaches: What teachers value and how teachers change. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1086/653473 Search in Google Scholar

Verdy, J. (2005). Le savoir professionnel des conseillers pédagogiques des ordres primaire et secondaire: Analyse descriptive (Master’s thesis, University of Montreal). https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/17799?locale-attribute=fr Search in Google Scholar

Walker, L., Dexter, E., Fountas, I., Scharer, P., Atteberry, A., & Bryk, A. (2008, March). Probing the influence of school context on coaching activity: Two contrasting Cases. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational research Association as part of the symposium “The Quantity, Quality, and Effects of K-2 Literacy Coaching: Preliminary Findings from a Four-Year Longitudinal Study of the Efficacy of Literacy Collaborative Professional Development”, New York. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.494.819 Search in Google Scholar

Walpole, S., & Blamey, K. L. (2008). Elementary literacy coaches: The reality of dual roles. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.3.4 Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (1984). Applications of case study research. Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research (3^rd ed.). Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research (5^th ed.). Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Yirci, R., Özdemir, T. Y., Kartal, S. E., & Kocabaş, I. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions regarding school principals’ coaching skills. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 34(5), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.905465 Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 Search in Google Scholar