<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>While studies on nations and nationalism have brilliantly demonstrated the influence of collective memory on national development, few studies have examined the reciprocity of this relationship. This article is therefore concerned with the laborious processes of memorizing the founding myths of both the Irish and Québécois nations. Indeed, while today the rebellion of 1798 in Ireland and those of 1837–1838 in Québec are central to their respective processes of identity-building, it has not been a calm process; the 1798 rebellion was buried in collective amnesia for almost a century and in Québec, the <italic>Patriotes</italic> rebellions have constantly moved in and out of collective memory. I argue, in this article, that the unstable definition of both nations harmed the process of remembrance. I am therefore interested in the long and conflicting journey that has enabled the Irish and Québécois nations to define themselves, respectively, by their religion and their language. Through a historiographical analysis of the speeches from several leaders of these two nationalist movements, this article shows how nations define and redefine themselves and how memories are also altered to meet those changes.</p>
</abstract>

While studies on nations and nationalism have brilliantly demonstrated the influence of collective memory on national development, few studies have examined the reciprocity of this relationship. This article is therefore concerned with the laborious processes of memorizing the founding myths of both the Irish and Québécois nations. Indeed, while today the rebellion of 1798 in Ireland and those of 1837–1838 in Québec are central to their respective processes of identity-building, it has not been a calm process; the 1798 rebellion was buried in collective amnesia for almost a century and in Québec, the Patriotes rebellions have constantly moved in and out of collective memory. I argue, in this article, that the unstable definition of both nations harmed the process of remembrance. I am therefore interested in the long and conflicting journey that has enabled the Irish and Québécois nations to define themselves, respectively, by their religion and their language. Through a historiographical analysis of the speeches from several leaders of these two nationalist movements, this article shows how nations define and redefine themselves and how memories are also altered to meet those changes.

Defining National Memories: The Cases of Popular Rebellions in Ireland and Québec

Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

While studies on nations and nationalism have brilliantly demonstrated the influence of collective memory on national development, few studies have examined...

Defining National Memories: The Cases of Popular Rebellions in Ireland and Québec

Publié en ligne: 07 mars 2022

Pages: 51 - 70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jnmlp-2022-0003

Mots clés
nation-building, remembrance, rebellions, Ireland, Québec, structural critical discourse analysis

© 2022 Christophe Davis, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Defining National Memories: The Cases of Popular Rebellions in Ireland and Québec

Publié en ligne: 07 mars 2022

Pages: 51 - 70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jnmlp-2022-0003

Mots clésnation-building, remembrance, rebellions, Ireland, Québec, structural critical discourse analysis

© 2022 Christophe Davis, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mots clés
nation-building, remembrance, rebellions, Ireland, Québec, structural critical discourse analysis