Key challenges for patient registries – A report from the 1^st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Registries

1 European Commission. European Health Data Space. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/dataspace_en (accessed 12 November 2021). European Commission European Health Data Space Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/dataspace_en (accessed 12 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

2 European Commission. Digital Health and Care: Transformation of health and care in the digital single market – Harnessing the potential of data to empower citizens and build a healthier society. [Infographic]. 2018. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/2018_ehealth_infographic_en.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021). European Commission Digital Health and Care: Transformation of health and care in the digital single market – Harnessing the potential of data to empower citizens and build a healthier society. [Infographic] 2018 Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/2018_ehealth_infographic_en.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

3 Orphanet. Rare disease registries in Europe. Orphanet Report Series: Rare Diseases collection. September 2020. Available from https://www.orpha.net/orphacom/cahiers/docs/GB/Registries.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021). Orphanet Rare disease registries in Europe. Orphanet Report Series: Rare Diseases collection September 2020 Available from https://www.orpha.net/orphacom/cahiers/docs/GB/Registries.pdf (accessed 12 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

4 Dolan G, Makris M, Bolton-Maggs PHB, Rowell JA. Enhancing haemophilia care through registries. Haemophilia 2014; 20: 121–129. doi: 10.1111/hae.12406. DolanG MakrisM Bolton-MaggsPHB RowellJA Enhancing haemophilia care through registries Haemophilia 2014 20 121 129 10.1111/hae.12406 24762287 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5 Ljung RCR. Registries and databases – A European perspective. Haemophilia 2020; 26: 26–28. doi: 10.1111/hae.13920. LjungRCR Registries and databases – A European perspective Haemophilia 2020 26 26 28 10.1111/hae.13920 32356342 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6 Nicholson N, Perego A. Interoperability of population-based patient registries. J Biomed Inform X 2020; 112 (supplement): 100074. doi: 10.1016/j.yjbinx.2020.100074. NicholsonN PeregoA Interoperability of population-based patient registries J Biomed Inform X 2020 112 supplement 100074 10.1016/j.yjbinx.2020.100074 34417011 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7 Hay CRM, Shima M, Makris M, et al. Challenges and key lessons from the design and implementation of an international haemophilia registry supposed by a pharmaceutical company. Haemophilia 2020; 26: 966–974. doi: 10.1111/hae.14144. HayCRM ShimaM MakrisM Challenges and key lessons from the design and implementation of an international haemophilia registry supposed by a pharmaceutical company Haemophilia 2020 26 966 974 10.1111/hae.14144 789435533094894 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8 Magajne M, Meglič M (eds). Methodological guidelines and recommendations for efficient and rational governance of patient registries. Cross-border Patient Registries Initiative (PARENT). Slovenia: National Institute of Public Health; 2015. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/patient_registries_guidelines_en.pdf (accessed 15 November 2021). MagajneM MegličM (eds). Methodological guidelines and recommendations for efficient and rational governance of patient registries. Cross-border Patient Registries Initiative (PARENT) Slovenia National Institute of Public Health 2015 Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/patient_registries_guidelines_en.pdf (accessed 15 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

9 European Medicines Agency Patient Registries Initiative. Report on haemophilia registries workshop 8 June 2018. EMA/487643/2018. 28 September 2018. Available from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/report-haemophilia-registries-workshop_en.pdf (accessed 15 November 2021). European Medicines Agency Patient Registries Initiative Report on haemophilia registries workshop 8 June 2018. EMA/487643/2018 28 September 2018 Available from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/report-haemophilia-registries-workshop_en.pdf (accessed 15 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

10 ECFS Patient Registry. Registry variables and definitions. Updated 21 October 2021. Available from https://www.ecfs.eu/projects/ecfs-patient-registry/variables-definitions (accessed 16 November 2021). ECFS Patient Registry Registry variables and definitions. Updated 21 October 2021 Available from https://www.ecfs.eu/projects/ecfs-patient-registry/variables-definitions (accessed 16 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

11 Grady C, Rubinstein YR, Groft SC. Informed consent and patient registry for the rare disease community: Editorial. Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33(1): 3–4. doi: 11.1016/j.cct.2011.10.005. GradyC RubinsteinYR GroftSC Informed consent and patient registry for the rare disease community: Editorial Contemp Clin Trials 2012 33 1 3 4 11.1016/j.cct.2011.10.005 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12 Blumenthal S. Improving interoperability between registries and EHRs. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc 2018; 2017: 20–25. BlumenthalS Improving interoperability between registries and EHRs AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc 2018 2017 20 25 Search in Google Scholar

13 Makady A, Ham RT, de Boer A, et al. GetReal Workpackage 1. Policies for use of real-world data in health technology assessment (HTA): A comparative study of six HTA agencies. Value Health 2017; 20(4): 520–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.003. MakadyA HamRT de BoerA GetReal Workpackage 1. Policies for use of real-world data in health technology assessment (HTA): A comparative study of six HTA agencies Value Health 2017 20 4 520 532 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.003 28407993 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14 Makady A, van Veelen A, Jonsson P, et al. Using real-world data in health technology assessment (HTA) practice: A comparative study of five HTA agencies. Pharmacoeconomics 2018; 36(3): 359–368. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0596-z. MakadyA van VeelenA JonssonP Using real-world data in health technology assessment (HTA) practice: A comparative study of five HTA agencies Pharmacoeconomics 2018 36 3 359 368 10.1007/s40273-017-0596-z 583459429214389 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15 Santanello N, Largent J, Myers E, et al. Engaging patients as partners throughout the registry life cycle. In: Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB, et al. (eds). 21st Century Patient Registries: Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 3rd Edition, Addendum [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493821/ (accessed 16 November 2021). SantanelloN LargentJ MyersE Engaging patients as partners throughout the registry life cycle In: GliklichRE DreyerNA LeavyMB (eds). 21st Century Patient Registries: Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide 3rd Edition Addendum [Internet]. Rockville (MD) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) 2018 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493821/ (accessed 16 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

16 Nelson EC, Dixon-Woods M, Batalden PB, et al. Patient focused registries can improve health, care and science. BMJ 2016; 354: i3319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3319. NelsonEC Dixon-WoodsM BataldenPB Patient focused registries can improve health, care and science BMJ 2016 354 i3319 10.1136/bmj.i3319 536761827370543 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17 EHC. Think Tank. Available from https://www.ehc.eu/thinktank/ (accessed 12 November 2021). EHC Think Tank Available from https://www.ehc.eu/thinktank/ (accessed 12 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

18 Chatham House. Chatham House rule. Available from https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/chatham-house-rule (accessed 12 November 2021). Chatham House Chatham House rule Available from https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/chatham-house-rule (accessed 12 November 2021). Search in Google Scholar