This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2012). Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 470–479.AbramoG.CiceroT.D’AngeloC. A. (2012). Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment. , 6(4), 470–479.Search in Google Scholar
Adams, J., Jackson, L., & Marshall, S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research (Vol. 2018) Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England.AdamsJ.JacksonL.MarshallS. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research (Vol. 2018) .Search in Google Scholar
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.AksnesD. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. , 12(3), 159–170.Search in Google Scholar
Bu, Y., Waltman, L., & Huang, Y. (2019). A multi-dimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 155–183.BuY.WaltmanL.HuangY. (2019). A multi-dimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications. , 2(1), 155–183.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Y. W., & Huang, M. H. (2012). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 22–33.ChangY. W.HuangM. H. (2012). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. , 63(1), 22–33.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, S. J., Arsenault, C., & Larivière, V. (2015). Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary? Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 1034–1046.ChenS. J.ArsenaultC.LarivièreV. (2015). Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary?, 9(4), 1034–1046.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, S. J., Qiu, J. P., Arsenault, C., & V Larivière. (2021). Exploring the interdisciplinarity patterns of highly cited papers. Journal of Informetrics, 15(1), 101124.ChenS. J.QiuJ. P.ArsenaultC.LarivièreV. (2021). Exploring the interdisciplinarity patterns of highly cited papers. , 15(1), 101124.Search in Google Scholar
Cole, S. (1983). The Hierarchy of the Sciences?. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 111–139.ColeS. (1983). The Hierarchy of the Sciences?. , 89(1), 111–139.Search in Google Scholar
Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703–722.CummingsJ. N.KieslerS. (2005). Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. , 35(5), 703–722.Search in Google Scholar
Djd, P. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and non-sciece. Communication among scientists and engineers, Heath Lexington Book, Lexington.DjdP. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and non-sciece. , Heath Lexington Book, Lexington.Search in Google Scholar
Dong, Y. X., Ma, H., Shen, Z. H., & Wang, K. S. (2017). A century of science: globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. arXiv:1704.05150v2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.05150.DongY. X.MaH.ShenZ. H.WangK. S. (2017). A century of science: globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.05150.Search in Google Scholar
Evans, E. D., Gomez, C. J., & Mcfarland, D. A. (2016). Measuring Paradigmaticness of Disciplines Using Text. Sociological Science, (32), 757–778.EvansE. D.GomezC. J.McfarlandD. A. (2016). Measuring Paradigmaticness of Disciplines Using Text. , (32), 757–778.Search in Google Scholar
Erich, J. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. Policy sciences, 1(1), 403–428.ErichJ. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. , 1(1), 403–428.Search in Google Scholar
Fanelli, D., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLOS ONE, 8(6), e66938.FanelliD.GlänzelW. (2013). Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences. , 8(6), e66938.Search in Google Scholar
Fanelli, D., Scalas, E.. (2010). “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10068.FanelliD.ScalasE.. (2010). “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences. , 5(4), e10068.Search in Google Scholar
Hessey, R., & Willett, P. (2012) Quantifying the value of knowledge exports from librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 141-150.HesseyR.WillettP. (2012) Quantifying the value of knowledge exports from librarianship and information science research. , 39(1), 141–150.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Lu, W., Liu, J. L., Cheng, Q. K., & Bu, Y. (2022). Towards transdisciplinary impact of scientific publications: A longitudinal, comprehensive, and large-scale analysis on Microsoft Academic Graph. Information Processing & Management, 59(2), 102859.HuangY.LuW.LiuJ. L.ChengQ. K.BuY. (2022). Towards transdisciplinary impact of scientific publications: A longitudinal, comprehensive, and large-scale analysis on Microsoft Academic Graph. , 59(2), 102859.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Gao, T., & Wang, Z. (2016). Interdisciplinary measurement research based on web of science classification. Science Research Management, 37(3), 9. 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2016.03.014HuangY.GaoT.WangZ. (2016). Interdisciplinary measurement research based on web of science classification. , 37(3), 9. 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2016.03.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jantsch, E.. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. Higher Education Quarterly, 1(1), 403–428.JantschE.. (1970). Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. , 1(1), 403–428.Search in Google Scholar
John, G.. (2020). Vocabulary sharing among subjects belonging to the hierarchy of sciences. Scientometrics, 125, 1965–1982.JohnG.. (2020). Vocabulary sharing among subjects belonging to the hierarchy of sciences. , 125, 1965–1982.Search in Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W.. (2010). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 60(3), 455–476.KlavansR.BoyackK. W.. (2010). Toward a consensus map of science. , 60(3), 455–476.Search in Google Scholar
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1973–1984.LevittJ. M.ThelwallM. (2008). Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. , 59(12), 1973–1984.Search in Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1996). Comte’s Philosophy of the Sciences. Auguste Comte.LewesG. H. (1996). . Auguste Comte.Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2018). Diversity and interdisciplinarity: How can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2113–2121.LeydesdorffL. (2018). Diversity and interdisciplinarity: How can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance. , 116(3), 2113–2121.Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Probst, C.. (2010). The Delineation of an Interdisciplinary Specialty in terms of a Journal Set: The Case of Communication Studies. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 60(8), 1709–1718.LeydesdorffL.ProbstC.. (2010). The Delineation of an Interdisciplinary Specialty in terms of a Journal Set: The Case of Communication Studies. , 60(8), 1709–1718.Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I.. (2010). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: diversity, centrality, and citations. Journal of Informetrics, (1), 87–100.LeydesdorffL.RafolsI.. (2010). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: diversity, centrality, and citations. , (1), 87–100.Search in Google Scholar
Liang, Z. T., Mao, J., Lu, K., & Li, G. (2021). Finding citations for PubMed: a large-scale comparison between five freely available bibliographic data sources. Scientometrics, 126, 9519–9542.LiangZ. T.MaoJ.LuK.LiG. (2021). Finding citations for PubMed: a large-scale comparison between five freely available bibliographic data sources. , 126, 9519–9542.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Y. X., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations: A case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 340–351.LiuY. X.RousseauR. (2010). Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations: A case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion. , 61(2), 340–351.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Z. L. (1993). Cross-research in the era of interdisciplinary science. Studies in Science of Science, (2), 9–17.LiuZ. L. (1993). Cross-research in the era of interdisciplinary science. , (2), 9–17.Search in Google Scholar
Lodahl, J. B., Gordon, G. (1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review, (2), 57–72.LodahlJ. B.GordonG. (1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. , (2), 57–72.Search in Google Scholar
Min, C., Bu, Y., Wu, D., Ding, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Identifying citation patterns of scientific breakthroughs: a perspective of dynamic citation process. Information Processing & Management, 58(1), 102428.MinC.BuY.WuD.DingY.ZhangY. (2021). Identifying citation patterns of scientific breakthroughs: a perspective of dynamic citation process. , 58(1), 102428.Search in Google Scholar
Min, C., Ding, Y., Li, J., & Sun, J. J. (2018). The diffusion of citations for individual publications. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 37(4), 341–350. (in Chinese.)MinC.DingY.LiJ.SunJ. J. (2018). The diffusion of citations for individual publications. , 37(4), 341–350. (
in Chinese.)Search in Google Scholar
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203–222.MorilloF.BordonsM.GómezI. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. , 51(1), 203–222.Search in Google Scholar
Okamura, K. (2019). Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism. Palgrave Commun, 5: 141.OkamuraK. (2019). Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism. , 5: 141.Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D. E. (1985). An Indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8(3-4), 161–176.PorterA. L.ChubinD. E. (1985). An Indicator of cross-disciplinary research. , 8(3-4), 161–176.Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.PorterA. L.CohenA. S.RoessnerJ. D.PerreaultM. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. , 72(1), 117–147.Search in Google Scholar
Price, D. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. Communication Among Scientists and Engineers, (1), 3–22.PriceD. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. , (1), 3–22.Search in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.RafolsI.MeyerM. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. , 82(2), 263–287.Search in Google Scholar
Reale, E., Avramov, D., Canhial, K., Donovan, C., Flecha, R., Holm, P., … & Van Horik, R. (2018). A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research. Research Evaluation, 27(4), 298–308.RealeE.AvramovD.CanhialK.DonovanC.FlechaR.HolmP. & Van HorikR. (2018). A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research. , 27(4), 298–308.Search in Google Scholar
Rinia, E. J., Leeuwen, T. Van, Leeuwen, T. Van, Bruins, E. E. W., & Raan, T. van (2001). Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics, 51(1), 293–309.RiniaE. J.LeeuwenT. VanLeeuwenT. VanBruinsE. E. W.RaanT. van (2001). Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. , 51(1), 293–309.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenfield, P. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35(11), 1343–1357.RosenfieldP. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. , 35(11), 1343–1357.Search in Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Rev. Gen. Psychol., 8: 59-67.SimontonD. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. ., 8: 59–67.Search in Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (2022). Hard science, soft science: A political history of a disciplinary array. History of Science, (3), 287–328.ShapinS. (2022). Hard science, soft science: A political history of a disciplinary array. , (3), 287–328.Search in Google Scholar
Shen, Z. H., Ma, H., & Wang, K. S.(2018). A Web-scale system for scientific knowledge exploration. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.12216.ShenZ. H.MaH.WangK. S.(2018). A Web-scale system for scientific knowledge exploration. . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.12216.Search in Google Scholar
Skilton, P.F. (2006). A comparative study of communal practice: Assessing the effects of taken-for-granted-ness on citation practice in scientific communities. Scientometrics, (68), 73–96.SkiltonP.F. (2006). A comparative study of communal practice: Assessing the effects of taken-for-granted-ness on citation practice in scientific communities. , (68), 73–96.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., & Stubbs, D. A. (2000). Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: A Latourian Survey of Inscription Practices. Social Studies of Science, 30(1), 73–94.SmithL. D.BestL. A.StubbsD. A. (2000). Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: A Latourian Survey of Inscription Practices. , 30(1), 73–94.Search in Google Scholar
Stegehuis, C. C., Litvak, N. N. , & Waltman, L. R.. (2015). Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 642–657.StegehuisC. C.LitvakN. N.WaltmanL. R.. (2015). Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications. , 9(3), 642–657.Search in Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.StirlingA. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. , 4(15), 707–719.Search in Google Scholar
Thed, V. L., & Robert, T. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of crossdisciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, (3), 183–187.ThedV. L.RobertT. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of crossdisciplinary citation flows. , (3), 183–187.Search in Google Scholar
Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, (3), 1195–1225.TahamtanI.AfsharA. S.AhamdzadehK. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. , (3), 1195–1225.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, J., Bart, T. , & Wolfgang, G. (2015). Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity. Plos One, (5), e0127298.WangJ.BartT. , & WolfgangG. (2015). Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity. , (5), e0127298.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, J., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2015). Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity. Plos One, 10(5), e0127298.WangJ.ThijsB.GlänzelW. (2015). Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity. , 10(5), e0127298.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, K. S., Shen, Z. H., Huang, C. Y., Wu, C. H., Dong, Y. X., & Kanakia, A. (2020). Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, (7), 1–18.WangK. S.ShenZ. H.HuangC. Y.WuC. H.DongY. X.KanakiaA. (2020). Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough. , (7), 1–18.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, M. Y., Yu, G., An, S., & Yu, D.R. (2012). Discovery of factors influencing citation impact based on a soft fuzzy rough set model. Scientometrics, 93(3), 635–644.WangM. Y.YuG.AnS.YuD.R. (2012). Discovery of factors influencing citation impact based on a soft fuzzy rough set model. , 93(3), 635–644.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, M. Y., Yu, G., & Yu, D. R. (2011). Mining typical features for highly cited papers. Scientometrics, (3), 695–706.WangM. Y.YuG.YuD. R. (2011). Mining typical features for highly cited papers. , (3), 695–706.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, L. F., Kittur, A., Youn, H. J., Milojevi, S., Leahey, E., Fiore, S. M., & Ahn, Y. Y. (2022). Metrics and mechanisms: measuring the unmeasurable in the science of science. Journal of Informetrics, 16(2), 101290.WuL. F.KitturA.YounH. J.MilojeviS.LeaheyE.FioreS. M.AhnY. Y. (2022). Metrics and mechanisms: measuring the unmeasurable in the science of science. , 16(2), 101290.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, J., Bu, Y., Ding, Y., Yang, S. N., Zhang, H. L., Yu, C., & Sun, L. (2018). Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: A case study on joint attention. Scientometrics, 117(2), 973–995.XuJ.BuY.DingY.YangS. N.ZhangH. L.YuC.SunL. (2018). Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: A case study on joint attention. , 117(2), 973–995.Search in Google Scholar
Yegros-Yegros, A., Rafols, I., & D’Este, P. (2015). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity. PloS One, 10(8), e0135095.Yegros-YegrosA.RafolsI.D’EsteP. (2015). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity. , 10(8), e0135095.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, C. Z., Liu, L. F., & Wang, Y. Z. (2021). Characterizing References from Different Disciplines: A Perspective of Citation Content Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2), 101134.ZhangC. Z.LiuL. F.WangY. Z. (2021). Characterizing References from Different Disciplines: A Perspective of Citation Content Analysis. , 15(2), 101134.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glanzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 67(5),1257-1265.ZhangL.RousseauR.GlanzelW. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. , 67(5), 12571265.Search in Google Scholar
Zuckerman, H. A., Merton, R. K. (1973). Age, aging, and age structure in science. The Sociology of Science, 4(2), 497–559.ZuckermanH. A.MertonR. K. (1973). Age, aging, and age structure in science. , 4(2), 497–559.Search in Google Scholar