The need to develop tailored tools for improving the quality of thematic bibliometric analyses: Evidence from papers published in Sustainability and Scientometrics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4/1: 1–21. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2019-0001AksnesD. W.SivertsenG. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4/1: 1–21. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2019-0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alsaawi, A. (2014). A Critical Review of Qualitative Interviews. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3/4: 149–56. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2819536AlsaawiA. (2014). A Critical Review of Qualitative Interviews. European Journal ofBusiness and Social Sciences, 3/4: 149–56. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2819536Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Beller, E. M., Chen, J. K.-H., Wang, U. L.-H., & Glasziou, P. P. (2013). Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?. Systematic Reviews, 2/1: 1–6.BellerE. M.ChenJ. K.-H.WangU. L.-H.GlasziouP. P. (2013). Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?. Systematic Reviews, 2/1: 1–6.Search in Google Scholar
Biocic, M., Fidahic, M., & Puljak, L. (2019). Reproducibility of search strategies of non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 122/6: e79–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.014BiocicM.FidahicM.PuljakL. (2019). Reproducibility of search strategies of non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 122/6: e79–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Smith, C. (2022). Raising the bar for bibliometric analysis’. STI 2022 Conference Proceedings. Presented at the 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, September 7, Granada. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6975632BoyackK. W.KlavansR.SmithC. (2022). Raising the bar for bibliometric analysis’. STI 2022 Conference Proceedings. Presented at the 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, September7, Granada. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6975632Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2021). Bibliometric reports for institutions: best practices in a responsible metrics scenario’. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6: 696470. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2021.696470Cabezas-ClavijoÁ.Torres-SalinasD. (2021). Bibliometric reports for institutions: best practices in a responsible metrics scenario’. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6: 696470. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2021.696470Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen, C. M., McCain, K., White, H., & Lin, X. (2002). Mapping Scientometrics (1981–2001). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39/1: 25–34.ChenC. M.McCainK.WhiteH.LinX. (2002). Mapping Scientometrics (1981–2001). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39/1: 25–34.Search in Google Scholar
Chou, R., Fu, R. W., Carson, S., Saha, S., & Helfand, M. (2007). Methodological shortcomings predicted lower harm estimates in one of two sets of studies of clinical interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60/1: 18–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.021ChouR.FuR. W.CarsonS.SahaS.HelfandM. (2007). Methodological shortcomings predicted lower harm estimates in one of two sets of studies of clinical interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60/1: 18–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Csomós, G., & Farkas, J. Z. (2022). Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04586-1CsomósG.FarkasJ. Z. (2022). Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04586-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Delgado López-Cózar, E., & Martín-Martín, A. (2022). Detectando patrones anómalos de publicación científica en España: Más sobre el impacto del sistema de evaluación científica’.Delgado López-CózarE.Martín-MartínA. (2022). Detectando patrones anómalos de publicación científica en España: Más sobre el impacto del sistema de evaluación científica’.Search in Google Scholar
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133: 285–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070DonthuN.KumarS.MukherjeeD.PandeyN.LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133: 285–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Early Warning Journal List. (2020). Retrieved 31 August 2023, from https://earlywarning. fenqubiao.com/#/en/Early Warning Journal List. (2020). Retrieved 31 August 2023, from https://earlywarning.fenqubiao.com/#/en/Search in Google Scholar
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105/3: 1809–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-zEllegaardO.WallinJ. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105/3: 1809–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Evans, C. (1997). The Use of Consensus Methods and Expert Panels in Pharmacoeconomic Studies. PharmacoEconomics, 12/2: 121–9. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00003EvansC. (1997). The Use of Consensus Methods and Expert Panels in Pharmacoeconomic Studies. PharmacoEconomics, 12/2: 121–9. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Committee for Public Information, Finnish Association for Scholarly Publishing, Universities Norway, & European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. (2019). Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication., pp. 621757-Bytes. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from <https://figshare.com/articles/Helsinki_Initiative_on_Multilingualism_in_Scholarly_ Communication/7887059>Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Committee for Public Information, Finnish Association for Scholarly Publishing, Universities Norway, & European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. (2019). Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication., pp. 621757–Bytes. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from <https://figshare.com/articles/Helsinki_Initiative_on_Multilingualism_in_Scholarly_ Communication/7887059>Search in Google Scholar
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016). Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 10/4: 933–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003FranceschiniF.MaisanoD.MastrogiacomoL. (2016). Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 10/4: 933–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Franco, J. V. A., Garrote, V. L., Escobar Liquitay, C. M., & Vietto, V. (2018). Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 9/3: 408–16. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1302FrancoJ. V. A.GarroteV. L.Escobar LiquitayC. M.ViettoV. (2018). Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 9/3: 408–16. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1302Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gao, H. C., & Wang, S. J. (2022). The Intellectual Structure of Research on Rural-to-Urban Migrants: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19/15: 9729. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159729GaoH. C.WangS. J. (2022). The Intellectual Structure of Research on Rural-to-Urban Migrants: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19/15: 9729. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159729Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W. (1996). The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology. Scientometrics, 35/2: 167–76. DOI: 10.1007/BF02018475GlänzelW. (1996). The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology. Scientometrics, 35/2: 167–76. DOI: 10.1007/BF02018475Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research’. Scientometrics, 53/2: 171–93.GlänzelW.MoedH. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research’. Scientometrics, 53/2: 171–93.Search in Google Scholar
González-Alcaide, G. (2021). Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?. Scientometrics, 126/8: 6837–70. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04061-3González-AlcaideG. (2021). Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?. Scientometrics, 126/8: 6837–70. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04061-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11/2: 181–217. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1378GusenbauerM.HaddawayN. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11/2: 181–217. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1378Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haddaway, N. R., Rethlefsen, M. L., Davies, M., Glanville, J., McGowan, B., Nyhan, K., & Young, S. (2022). A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18/4: e1288. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1288HaddawayN. R.RethlefsenM. L.DaviesM.GlanvilleJ.McGowanB.NyhanK.YoungS. (2022). A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18/4: e1288. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1288Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Harzing, A.-W. (2016). Why replication studies are essential: learning from failure and success. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23/4: 563–8. DOI: 10.1108/CCSM-07-2016-0133HarzingA.-W. (2016). Why replication studies are essential: learning from failure and success. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23/4: 563–8. DOI: 10.1108/CCSM-07-2016-0133Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jonkers, K., & Derrick, G. E. (2012). The bibliometric bandwagon: Characteristics of bibliometric articles outside the field literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63/4: 829–36.JonkersK.DerrickG. E. (2012). The bibliometric bandwagon: Characteristics of bibliometric articles outside the field literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63/4: 829–36.Search in Google Scholar
Koffel, J. B., & Rethlefsen, M. L. (2016). Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 11/9: e0163309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309KoffelJ. B.RethlefsenM. L. (2016). Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 11/9: e0163309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2014). Comparing samples—part II. Nature Methods, 11/4: 355–6. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2900KrzywinskiM.AltmanN. (2014). Comparing samples—part II. Nature Methods, 11/4: 355–6. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2900Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., Pandey, N., & Christopher Westland, J. (2021). 20 years of Electronic Commerce Research. Electronic Commerce Research, 21/1: 1–40. DOI: 10.1007/s10660-021-09464-1KumarS.LimW. M.PandeyN.Christopher WestlandJ. (2021). 20 years of Electronic Commerce Research. Electronic Commerce Research, 21/1: 1–40. DOI: 10.1007/s10660-021-09464-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lindner, M. D., Torralba, K. D., & Khan, N. A. (2018). Scientific productivity: An exploratory study of metrics and incentives. PLOS ONE, 13/4: e0195321. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0195321LindnerM. D.TorralbaK. D.KhanN. A. (2018). Scientific productivity: An exploratory study of metrics and incentives. PLOS ONE, 13/4: e0195321. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0195321Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu, F. (2022). Retrieval strategy and possible explanations for the abnormal growth of research publications: re-evaluating a bibliometric analysis of climate change. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04540-1LiuF. (2022). Retrieval strategy and possible explanations for the abnormal growth of research publications: re-evaluating a bibliometric analysis of climate change. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04540-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu, W. S. (2017). The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science’s three journal citation indexes. Learned Publishing, 30/2: 115–23. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1089LiuW. S. (2017). The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science’s three journal citation indexes. Learned Publishing, 30/2: 115–23. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu, W. S. (2019). The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough. Scientometrics, 121/3: 1815–24. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03238-1LiuW. S. (2019). The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough. Scientometrics, 121/3: 1815–24. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03238-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu, W. S. (2021). Caveats for the use of Web of Science Core Collection in old literature retrieval and historical bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172: 121023. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121023LiuW. S. (2021). Caveats for the use of Web of Science Core Collection in old literature retrieval and historical bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172: 121023. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lund, B. (2022). Bibliometrics Is Valuable Science. Why Do Some Journals Seem to Oppose It?. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7/3: 1–4. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2022-0012LundB. (2022). Bibliometrics Is Valuable Science. Why Do Some Journals Seem to Oppose It?. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7/3: 1–4. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2022-0012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maddi, A., & Baudoin, L. (2022). The quality of the web of science data: a longitudinal study on the completeness of authors-addresses links. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04525-0MaddiA.BaudoinL. (2022). The quality of the web of science data: a longitudinal study on the completeness of authors-addresses links. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04525-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts Are More Important Than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences. Educational Researcher,43/6:304–16. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X14545513MakelM. C.PluckerJ. A. (2014). Facts Are More Important Than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences. Educational Researcher, 43/6:304–16. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X14545513Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7/6: 537–42. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612460688MakelM. C.PluckerJ. A.HegartyB. (2012). Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7/6: 537–42. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612460688Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., Coriat, A.-M., et al. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology, 18/7: e3000737. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737MoherD.BouterL.KleinertS.GlasziouP.ShamM. H.BarbourV.CoriatA.-M. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology, 18/7: e3000737. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106: 213–28. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5MongeonP.Paul-HusA. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106: 213–28. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de la información, 29/1. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03Moral-MuñozJ. A.Herrera-ViedmaE.Santisteban-EspejoA.CoboM. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de la información, 29/1. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mueller-Langer, F., Fecher, B., Harhoff, D., & Wagner, G. G. (2019). Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?. Research Policy, 48/1: 62–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.019Mueller-LangerF.FecherB.HarhoffD.WagnerG. G. (2019). Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?. Research Policy, 48/1: 62–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ng, J. Y., Haustein, S., Ebrahimzadeh, S., Chen, C., Sabe, M., Solmi, M., & Moher, D. (2023). Guidance List for repOrting Bibliometric AnaLyses (GLOBAL): A Research Protocol.NgJ. Y.HausteinS.EbrahimzadehS.ChenC.SabeM.SolmiM.MoherD. (2023). Guidance List for repOrting Bibliometric AnaLyses (GLOBAL): A Research Protocol.Search in Google Scholar
Nicoll, L. H., Oermann, M. H., Carter-Templeton, H., Owens, J. K., & Edie, A. H. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of articles identified by editors as representing excellence in nursing publication: Replication and extension. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76/5: 1247–54. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14316NicollL. H.OermannM. H.Carter-TempletonH.OwensJ. K.EdieA. H. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of articles identified by editors as representing excellence in nursing publication: Replication and extension. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76/5: 1247–54. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14316Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
O’Donohoe, T. J., Bridson, T. L., Shafik, C. G., Wynne, D., Dhillon, R. S., & Tee, J. W. (2021). Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews. Neurosurgery, 88/5: 891–9. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa573O’DonohoeT. J.BridsonT. L.ShafikC. G.WynneD.DhillonR. S.TeeJ. W. (2021). Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews. Neurosurgery, 88/5: 891–9. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa573Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Oviedo-García, M. A. (2021). Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Research Evaluation, 30/3: 405–19.Oviedo-GarcíaM. A. (2021). Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Research Evaluation, 30/3: 405–19.Search in Google Scholar
Patil, I. (2021). Visualizations with statistical details: The “ggstatsplot” approach. Journal of Open Source Software, 6/61: 3167. DOI: 10.21105/joss.03167PatilI. (2021). Visualizations with statistical details: The “ggstatsplot” approach. Journal of Open Source Software, 6/61: 3167. DOI: 10.21105/joss.03167Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Perry, T., Morris, R., & Lea, R. (2022). A decade of replication study in education? A mapping review (2011–2020). Educational Research and Evaluation, 27/1–2: 12–34. DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2021.2022315PerryT.MorrisR.LeaR. (2022). A decade of replication study in education? A mapping review (2011–2020). Educational Research and Evaluation, 27/1–2: 12–34. DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2021.2022315Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Petrovich, E. (2022). Bibliometrics in Press. Representations and uses of bibliometric indicators in the Italian daily newspapers. Scientometrics, 127/5: 2195–233. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04341-6PetrovichE. (2022). Bibliometrics in Press. Representations and uses of bibliometric indicators in the Italian daily newspapers. Scientometrics, 127/5: 2195–233. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04341-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9/1: 12. DOI: 10.3390/publications9010012PranckutėR. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9/1: 12. DOI: 10.3390/publications9010012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Repiso, R., Merino-Arribas, A., & Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2021). El año que nos volvimos insostenibles: Análisis de la producción española en Sustainability (2020). El Profesional de la información, 30/4: e300409. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2021.jul.09RepisoR.Merino-ArribasA.Cabezas-ClavijoÁ. (2021). El año que nos volvimos insostenibles: Análisis de la producción española en Sustainability (2020). El Profesional de la información, 30/4: e300409. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2021.jul.09Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., & Koffel, J. B. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10/1: 39. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-zRethlefsenM. L.KirtleyS.WaffenschmidtS.AyalaA. P.MoherD.PageM. J.KoffelJ. B. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10/1: 39. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Romanelli, J. P., Pereira Gonçalves, M. C., de Abreu Pestana, L. F., Hitaka Soares, J. A., Stucchi Boschi, R., & Fernandes Andrade, D. (2021). Four challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28/43: 60448–58. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16420-xRomanelliJ. P.Pereira GonçalvesM. C.de Abreu PestanaL. F.Hitaka SoaresJ. A.Stucchi BoschiR.Fernandes AndradeD. (2021). Four challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28/43: 60448–58. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16420-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ryan, J. C., & A Tipu, S. A. (2022). Business and management research: Low instances of replication studies and a lack of author independence in replications. Research Policy, 51/1: 104408. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104408RyanJ. C.A TipuS. A. (2022). Business and management research: Low instances of replication studies and a lack of author independence in replications. Research Policy, 51/1: 104408. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104408Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sadeghi-Ghyassi, F., Zarea Gavgani, V., Fathifar, Z., Makani, N., Vaez, R., & Montazeri, M. (2022). Quality of reporting of literature search strategies in systematic reviews published on the role of telehealth during COVID-19. Journal of Information Science, 01655515221087649. DOI: 10.1177/01655515221087649Sadeghi-GhyassiF.Zarea GavganiV.FathifarZ.MakaniN.VaezR.MontazeriM. (2022). Quality of reporting of literature search strategies in systematic reviews published on the role of telehealth during COVID-19. Journal of Information Science, 01655515221087649. DOI: 10.1177/01655515221087649Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Saltelli, A., & Funtowicz, S. (2017). What is science’s crisis really about?. Futures, Post-Normal science in practice, 91: 5–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010SaltelliA.FuntowiczS. (2017). What is science’s crisis really about?. Futures, Post-Normal science in practice, 91: 5–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Salvador-Oliván, J. A., Marco-Cuenca, G., & Arquero-Avilés, R. (2018). Las revisiones sistemáticas en Biblioteconomía y Documentación: análisis y evaluación del proceso de búsqueda. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41/2: e207–e207. DOI: 10.3989/redc.2018.2.1491Salvador-OlivánJ. A.Marco-CuencaG.Arquero-AvilésR. (2018). Las revisiones sistemáticas en Biblioteconomía y Documentación: análisis y evaluación del proceso de búsqueda. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41/2: e207–e207. DOI: 10.3989/redc.2018.2.1491Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Salvador-Oliván, J. A., Marco-Cuenca, G., & Arquero-Avilés, R. (2019). Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 107/2: 210–21. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2019.567Salvador-OlivánJ. A.Marco-CuencaG.Arquero-AvilésR. (2019). Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 107/2: 210–21. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2019.567Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sandström, U., & Hällsten, M. (2008). Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics, 74/2: 175–89. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-0211-3SandströmU.HällstenM. (2008). Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics, 74/2: 175–89. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-0211-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Siler, K. (2020). Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71/11: 1386–401. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24339SilerK. (2020). Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71/11: 1386–401. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24339Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tamala, J. K., Maramag, E. I., Simeon, K. A., & Ignacio, J. J. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of sustainable oil and gas production research using VOSviewer. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 7: 100437. DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100437TamalaJ. K.MaramagE. I.SimeonK. A.IgnacioJ. J. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of sustainable oil and gas production research using VOSviewer. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 7: 100437. DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100437Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tipu, S. A. A., & Ryan, J. C. (2021). Are business and management journals anti-replication? An analysis of editorial policies. Management Research Review, 45/1: 101–17. DOI: 10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0050TipuS. A. A.RyanJ. C. (2021). Are business and management journals anti-replication? An analysis of editorial policies. Management Research Review, 45/1: 101–17. DOI: 10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0050Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vera-Baceta, M.-A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121/3: 1803–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03264-zVera-BacetaM.-A.ThelwallM.KoushaK. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121/3: 1803–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03264-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Visser, M., Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and MicrosoftAcademic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2/1: 20–41. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00112VisserM.Van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and MicrosoftAcademic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2/1: 20–41. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00112Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalisation of student’s problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34/1–2: 28–35. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28WelchB. L. (1947). The generalisation of student’s problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34/1–2: 28–35. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28Open DOISearch in Google Scholar