Accès libre

The need to develop tailored tools for improving the quality of thematic bibliometric analyses: Evidence from papers published in Sustainability and Scientometrics

Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo

Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo

Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)Logroño, Spain
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Cabezas-Clavijo, Alvaro
, 
Yusnelkis Milanés-Guisado

Yusnelkis Milanés-Guisado

Universidad Pablo de OlavideSevilla, Spain
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis
, 
Ruben Alba-Ruiz

Ruben Alba-Ruiz

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las NievesGranada, Spain
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Alba-Ruiz, Ruben
 et 
Ángel M. Delgado-Vázquez

Ángel M. Delgado-Vázquez

Universidad Pablo de OlavideSevilla, Spain
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Delgado-Vázquez, Ángel M.
  
22 sept. 2023
The need to develop tailored tools for improving the quality of thematic bibliometric analyses: Evidence from papers published in Sustainability and Scientometrics's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Catégorie d'article: Research Paper
Publié en ligne: 22 sept. 2023
Pages: 10 - 35
Reçu: 20 juin 2023
Accepté: 01 sept. 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0021
Mots clés
© 2023 Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1.

Journals with the highest bibliometric production (2019-2021). Source: Own elaboration based on Web ofScience data (SCI and SSCI indexes). All languages are considered. Search equation: TS=(bibliometric* OR scientometric* OR webometric* OR altmetric* OR informetrics* OR “citation analysis” OR “citation study” OR “scholarly productivity” OR “publication analysis” OR “scholarly impact” OR “patent citation”) AND PY=(2019-2021) AND DT=(article OR review)①. Early Access articles were excluded. The highest quartile of the journal in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2021 is indicated.
Journals with the highest bibliometric production (2019-2021). Source: Own elaboration based on Web ofScience data (SCI and SSCI indexes). All languages are considered. Search equation: TS=(bibliometric* OR scientometric* OR webometric* OR altmetric* OR informetrics* OR “citation analysis” OR “citation study” OR “scholarly productivity” OR “publication analysis” OR “scholarly impact” OR “patent citation”) AND PY=(2019-2021) AND DT=(article OR review)①. Early Access articles were excluded. The highest quartile of the journal in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2021 is indicated.

Figure 2.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria used and determination of the final sample analysed.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria used and determination of the final sample analysed.

Figure 3.

Distribution of number of flaws by journal.
Distribution of number of flaws by journal.

Figure 4.

Comparison of shortcomings among journals for each of the parameters. SU= Sustainability; SC= Scientometrics.
Comparison of shortcomings among journals for each of the parameters. SU= Sustainability; SC= Scientometrics.

Figure 5.

Percentage of articles by number of shortcomings for each journal.
Percentage of articles by number of shortcomings for each journal.

Number and percentage of shortcomings_

Sustainability n= 391 (77%) Scientometrics n= 117 (23%) Total n= 508 (100 %) p*
Search string, n (%) 150 (38.4) 41 (35.0) 191 (37,6) 0.295
Sample, n (%) 114 (29.2) 24 (20.5) 138 (27.2) 0.039
Search date, n (%) 164 (41.9) 54 (46.2) 218 (42.9) 0.241
Period, n (%) 176 (45.0) 40 (34.9) 216 (42.5) 0.024
Sources, n (%) * 172 (65.6) 45 (57.0) 217 (63.6) 0.102
Doc_types, n (%) 63 (16.1) 38 (23.9) 91 (17.9) 0.039
Language, n (%) 161 (41.2) 72 (61.5) 233 (45.9) <0.001

Descriptive data relating to the parameters Sources, Document types and Languages_

Sustainability n= 391 (77%) Scientometrics n= 117 (23%) Total n= 508 (100%) p*
Sources, no. (%) 0.007
WoS only 181 (46.3%) 55 (47.0%) 236 (46.5%)
Scopus only 113 (28.9%) 23 (19.7%) 136 (26.8%)
WoS + Scopus only 52 (13.3%) 11 (9.4%) 63 (12.4%)
WoS or/and Scopus + other source(s) 34 (8.7%) 17 (14.5%) 51 (10.0%)
Other sources (not WoS nor Scopus) 10 (2.6%) 11 (9.4%) 21 (4.1%)
No data 1 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.2%)
Document type, no. (%) 0.036
Articles + Other doc types 126 (32.2%) 43 (36.8%) 169 (33.3%)
Articles only 122 (31.2%) 22 (18.8%) 144 (28.3%)
All 79 (20.2%) 23 (19.7%) 102 (20.1%)
Other doc types 1 (0.3%) 1 (0.9%) 2 (0.4%)
No data 63 (16.1%) 28 (23.9%) 91 (17.9%)
Language, no. <(%)
English only 150 (38.4%) 21 (17.9%) 171 (33.7%)
All 68 (17.4%) 21 (17.9%) 89 (17.5%)
English + others 11 (2.8%) 2 (1.7%) 13 (2.6%)
Not English 1 (0.3%) 1 (0.9%) 2 (0.4%)
No data 161 (41.2%) 72 (61.5%) 233 (45.9%)

Descriptive data relating to the parameters Sample, Period and Number of Sources_

Sustainability Scientometrics Total p*
N (%) 391 (77%) 117 (23%) 508 (100 %) 0.740
Sample analysed 678 [193-2206] 2,009 [607.5-8394.75] 846 [229.5-2932.5] 0.001
Period analysed (years) 22 [14-32] 25 [12-37] 23 [14-33.5] 0.426
Number of sources analysed 1 [1-1] 1 [1-2] 1 [1-1] 0.231
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Informatique, Informatique, Gestion de projet, Bases de données et exploration de données
RSS Feed de la revue